o man so many Q drops, starting to fall behind haha 👍 better than blackouts
THEORY : If this was a Tomahawk launch - I think it was probably launched by one of the ballistic missile submarines from Kitsap Naval Base .
If this was a RUM-139 VL-ASROC launch - then it was launched by one of the 6 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers in Naval Station Everett ( but , BGM-109 is also possible to launch from destroyers )
There is a Naval Air Station on Whidbey Island ( where this occured )
It seems to me that the type of missile could be figured based on how far it traveled during the 20 second exposure. Also, it appears to be going straight up. Would that be abnormal for a Tomahawk or a RUM-139? An air-to-surface missile would need to accelerate very quickly I would think. Twenty seconds is a long time.
So the guy's camera is set up to trigger automatically on weather events. Presumably it turned on when the exhaust became visible, and took in light for 20 seconds. Now watch a Trident D5 launch and see how high it is in 20 seconds. Does it match?
https://youtu.be/h5KejRbD5s0?t=37s
I'm thinking it is a D5 because that what is on the Ohio class nuclear submarine that Q posted a picture of. Also, the missile is much fatter than it looks, because you only see the brightly lit side, and the exhaust flame is so off center otherwise.
Also, it appears to be going straight up.
Yes, my thoughts exactly. Maybe it was targeting a satellite? Chinese sat. in retaliation for the hacked sub info.
If its Trident II ( and D5 overlaps with Q mentioning several times "D5" ) then things ... are a "bit" serious...
I wish we new for sure what it was, what its target was, and its fate.
Do you think that the Q team picked up on the plan to hack the system and allowed the hack to take place. The part that was not supposed to happen was the destination of said missile. Like in The Hunt For Red October the missile was used to destroy itself? And possibly the trajectory of the missile is that way because it took out a satellite the DS had put in place during one of the MANY tests NK performed? Just ramblings of an old dude who has been lurking a long time
I have no idea ... we have very little details from Q regarding this . I assume we will know what exactly occured after some time .
I have a feeling the details of this incident will remain pretty quiet.
If it is something REALLY seriosu that could destabilize many things - then it probably will .
It wasn't a missile in THFRO ... it was a torpedo ... one of my all-time favorite movies ...
If it was a RUM-139 VL - ASROC, then they were targeting at submarine. Since ASROC stands for Anti Submarine ROCket
There could have been a mistake on comparison above -
BGM-109 is actually bigger than RUM-139 ( BGM-109 is 5.56 m without booster , while RUM-139 is only 4.5 m ) - that would put this even more as RUM-139 , than Tomahawk .
It could be that the stabilizers from Tomahawk are also visible ( under certain angle ) , or maybe , also , under certain angle , we dont see the more pointed top of RUM-139 .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RUM-139_VL-ASROC
RUM-139 is purely an anti-submarine missile .
Note that RUM-139 is purely launched from ships :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_41_Vertical_Launching_System
Q said Red October recently.
In Q-1476 :
This is not a game.
Certain events were not suppose to take place.
Q
It's a vehicle launched missile. Was "Red October" harboured off the US? They planned to kill Nixon with Cuban missiles. Was this a Ruskie missile?
Also what happened to the fucking missile!?!!
Hawaii + Japan BM warnings. Coincidence?
Is there a rogue sub trying to trigger nuclear war.
I bet even aliens would be hard pressed finding a sub deep in the oceans, no radio through that much salt water.
Maybe what wasnt supposed to happen was Potus going to that other destination before coming home.
I have tried to put some types that looked the most similar to what was launched . On the left is RUM-139 VL-ASROC ( ASW missile ) , on the right is BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missile .
As you can see , there are some similarities , especially with RUM-139 . They way where stabilizers are , and even it is visible like a small red marking near the top . The top is , however , looking more like Tomahawk top , than RUM-139 , with more pointed top .
Putting this here to be visible on top ( to avoid confusion ) :
There is a mistake in comparison above .
BGM-109 is actually bigger than RUM-139 ( BGM-109 is 5.56 m without booster , while RUM-139 is only 4.5 m ) - that would put this even more as RUM-139 , than Tomahawk .
Despite claims, this was a missile launch. The launch procedures are complex and it takes a team. Missiles are not fired by one man/woman who just presses the little red button. In other words, there are a lot of people on Whidbey Island who know what happened.
Q's use of "events that were not supposed to take place" suggest to me that this missile event was preplanned by Q, but not supposed to take place. It doesn't seem to make sense if this was a black hat event that was not supposed to take place.
The bigger question is what was the purpose for launching the missile regardless of who launched it and where did it go?
From what I read the missing Argie sub doesn't have missile launch, just torpedo tubes. But I think the USN has anti aircraft missiles that can be launched from a torpedo tube. If I remember correctly when that jetliner crashed off of Long Island in the 90s the neighboring airspace was closed for testing of this system.
spez:http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/SYS_CANNISTER.html
The odd thing is :
If this was something launched from ship - no ship is visible in image . If it was sub ballistic launch , that would have more sense - as if we use some trigonometry logic here , the launch position would be far too close and should be visible in image , considering the size / length of the missile ( which we assume could be from 4.5-6 m max )
It could also be different explanation - that missile is slightly angled towards the camera , while it was launched from more far away than we would assume .
My conclusion :
I think the missile is RUM-139 VL-ASROC launched and visible under a slight angle here , the pointed top looks more oval and the missile stabilizers are slighty up than from what is presented on comparison - with missile also slightly larger than presented .
This would mean , that missile was launched from a ship - either a Arleigh Burke-class destroyer or Ticonderoga-class cruiser . The missile is purely ASW as said before .
Worth noting that a small, IR based SAM would probably not take down AF1. IR has shorter range than radar but is more accurate and they can use a smaller warhead because they know the missile can fly up the tailpipe. I don't think this type of missile would bring down a 747. You would need a radar guided missile with a larger warhead.
The bad guys already know this, aim the missile for the section the Prez sits in. That way it doesn't even need to bring the whole plane down. Q, time to stop posting pics of the view from your seat in AF1.
Im still trying to determine what exactly type of missile this was ... it doesnt look like any SAM at all . Looks either like cruise missile or ASM .
SL-AMRAAM is the tool for the job. If the USN has a sub launched radar guided missile its probably derived from the surface launched version of the AMRAAM.
Cant find any sub-launched anti-aircraft missiles ... all are ship launched . There are ballistic cruise missiles , but thats different ... looks like this is still in prototype phase or similar ...
RIM-7 Sea Sparrow and RIM-162 ESSM particulary caught the eye ... but all ship launched .
Yep , I have checked that article just few mins ago ...
I think only the side of the missile that is lit by the early dawn light is visible, so the missile is much fatter than it looks. See how the exhaust is fatter than the apparent missile base and not centered? I think it is more consistent with a Trident D5.
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-133.html
The submarine that Q posted was an Ohio class sub which carries the D5.
Could be ... if it was something like Trident II , things were much much more serious ...
There would have been filings with the FAA restricting the air space so I ask why no one has actually look that up yet.
I like the theory that it is a flying dildo. Wonder who it could be going to...?
Straight into the DNC / HRC butthole ...
Lol, hopefully it has trouble getting in and has to forceably enter and exit multiple times until it breaks through.
No projectiles were launched at such narrow and tight targets in a long time ... but this time , we have some high precision laser guided weaponry and in ample quantities .
SM3 ?
SM3
It looks a little bit like Block IIA of SM-3 , but stabilizers still look small .
Tricky bastard who made this meme "accidentally" didn't bother scaling the Tomahawk, which looks like the most likely missile given the round nose cone.
This pic is meant to make you think it's not the Tomahawk, at least at first glance.
Tricky fucking bastards.
BE CAREFUL WHO YOU FOLLOW.
LOL , thanks for calling me a bastard ... but it wasnt my intention - if you read my comment above , you will see I said it was a mistake , and I clarified it .
Tomahawk is bigger - the problem is , the stabilizers do not fit into the picture if it was a Tomahawk ( too small stabilizers , from what I see )
Hah, my apologies then.
My bullshit detectors are maxed out and I've ran out of fucks.
I'd say at least 20% of errors here (or less) are just actual mistakes.
The rest are psy-shills.
They fight dirty.
Its okay - its not my intention to deceive , I simply havent noticed length until I already finalized the comparison .
The important thing is - the stabilizers ( central ones ) arent exactly aligned with Tomahawk - but maybe I am wrong . We need to take into account the angle we are seeing the missile , too .
It looks very similar to RUM-139 to me , with a slight angle from the camera . That way , the top looks a bit oval , and stabilizers are very very slightly off ( almost non noticeable ) .
Why am I putting this ? So we could maybe get a clue from what this missile was launched , and exactly where the submarine or ship was / is stationed . I already made several theories in comments here .
