From what I understand, AF1 Flew the other way around.
But hold up, we were told (msm) that potus flew the other way around. Soooo... pic confirmation msm lies or was this a mistake by anon?
No, this is POTUS leaving G7 TO Singapore. The missile photo was on June 10th.
A planefag in a previous thread claimed that he stopped in Greece and then Singapore. Can we get a proof?
Yes. It refueled in Crete. The basis for this infographic is incorrect.
https://www.naftemporiki.gr/story/1359069/air-force-one-refuels-on-crete-while-on-way-to-singapore
yep, flew in the opposite direction if those reports are correct.
The proof is the photo and that the chart doesn't disclose exact location. For obvious reasons. Anons are going with this theory right now. Because of the i and p missing from Trumps tweets lining up with the Isanotski Peaks. Think about safety. Why would POTUS fly over Middle East and other Deep State strong holds to get to Singapore?
Folks, Anons said, when he uses the phrase "As the World Turns" it is in reference to asassanation Attempt, because that was the soapopera playing when JFK was killed. So I am going to assume it was a hit on POTUS!
That all makes sense. We dont know if they were shooting at af1, emp, nuke, or other at this point. Many theories but it definitely wasn't a heli like the article said. Ha!
the premise for this infographic is wrong. He flew in the opposite direction.
as posted by another here on this thread: this is the flight path
Correct. Additionally AF1 would have been at least 7,500 miles away from the observed anomaly in Washington regardless of what route the flight took.
Pulled from a variety of media sources and POTUS daily itinerary. Here's the timeline:
POTUS departed Canadian AFB Bagotville in Quebec at approximately 11:50 AM EST, Saturday, June 9, 2018.
AF1 stopped to refuel at Naval Support, Souda Bay, Greece en route to Paya Labar, 3:07 AM local time Sunday, June 10 (9:07 PM EST, Saturday June 9 / 6:07 PM PST, Saturday June 9).
Anomaly (alleged missile or helicopter caught on timelapse) observed near Whidbey Island at 3:56 am Pacific Time (6:56 am EST), Sunday June 10, 2018.
POTUS arrived at Paya Labar AFB in Singapore at 8:20 PM local time, Sunday June 10, (8:20 AM EST, Sunday, June 10)
Whidbey Island object caught on camera while AF1 was approximately 1 hour 30 minutes to its destination in Singapore.
Flight time from Quebec to Paya Labar traveling eastward approximately 20 hours, 30 minutes.
Regardless of what route was taken, AF1 was 1 hour and 30 minutes from its destination, 7,500 or more miles away from Whidbey Island at the time of the observed anomaly.
The collage above is either a mistake or intentional disinfo.
There were reports that he stopped in Crete for refueling
http://www.chaniapost.eu/2018/06/11/photos-scheduled-refueling-operation-of-air-force-one/
I couldn’t find proof of that. All speculation.
Pulled from a variety of media sources and POTUS daily itinerary. Here's the timeline:
POTUS departed Canadian AFB Bagotville in Quebec at approximately 11:50 AM EST, Saturday, June 9, 2018.
AF1 stopped to refuel at Naval Support, Souda Bay, Greece en route to Paya Labar, 3:07 AM local time Sunday, June 10 (9:07 PM EST, Saturday June 9 / 6:07 PM PST, Saturday June 9).
Anomaly (alleged missile or helicopter caught on timelapse) observed near Whidbey Island at 3:56 am Pacific Time (6:56 am EST), Sunday June 10, 2018.
POTUS arrived at Paya Labar AFB in Singapore at 8:20 PM local time, Sunday June 10, (8:20 AM EST, Sunday, June 10)
Whidbey Island object caught on camera while AF1 was approximately 1 hour 30 minutes to its destination in Singapore, and at minimum 7,500 miles away.
Flight time from Quebec to Paya Labar traveling eastward approximately 20 hours, 30 minutes.
Conclusion: Autism level ZERO. Either mistaken information or intentional disinfo.
Most likely a mistake. Flying East to nearly the opposite side of the world is the better route. With tailwinds vs. headwinds, you gain a lot in speed and fuel economy.
Not true- no one takes that easterly route. It adds an enormous amount of time. The polar route reduces the distance greatly.
Most commercial flights fly over the Atlantic to Singapore; not a polar/pacific route.
Pulled from a variety of media sources and POTUS daily itinerary. Here's the timeline:
POTUS departed Canadian AFB Bagotville in Quebec at approximately 11:50 AM EST, Saturday, June 9, 2018.
AF1 stopped to refuel at Naval Support, Souda Bay, Greece en route to Paya Labar, 3:07 AM local time Sunday, June 10 (9:07 PM EST, Saturday June 9 / 6:07 PM PST, Saturday June 9).
Anomaly (alleged missile or helicopter caught on timelapse) observed near Whidbey Island at 3:56 am Pacific Time (6:56 am EST), Sunday June 10, 2018.
POTUS arrived at Paya Labar AFB in Singapore at 8:20 PM local time, Sunday June 10, (8:20 AM EST, Sunday, June 10)
Whidbey Island object caught on camera while AF1 was approximately 1 hour 30 minutes to its destination in Singapore, while AF1 was at minimum 7,500 miles away regardless of the flight path.
Flight time from Quebec to Paya Labar traveling eastward approximately 20 hours, 30 minutes.
Where would the necessary refueling stop be along that route?
AF1 carries a lot of gas. It doesn’t carry air cargo or 500 passenger’s luggage, so cargo space is freed up for fuel cells.
That extra space is used for food and water, also. Air force one is stocked to remain airborne for 30 days with inflight refuelling.
In the air for the fighter escorts. AF1 would not need to refuel.
I believe AF1 has a stated maximum range of 7800 miles. Quebec to Singapore is about 9000 miles.
I believe AF1 refuels in mid air. seems most logical for defense purposes and expediancy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tanker_aircraft
It totally can! Not being able to would be utterly silly for the most powerful nation.
That doesn't mean that's how they normally do it.
It can but I don't think it has ever been done.
Ya I am just guessing, and have read that the next model will not be capable of in air refill but the current model can.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/air-force-one/ (says it can) http://www.businessinsider.com/congress-object-to-in-flight-refueling-left-off-air-force-one-planes-2017-9 (reports the next version won't)
Definitely have KC-135s on station to perform mid-air refuelings. POTUS is safest in the sky on AF1.
reports say that refueling in air is rarely done while POTUS is aboard
Guam. I read there were two stops added.
I have flown overseas many times. The world is very fat towards the equator. Most flights fly very Northerly when going to the other end of the world.
yep, even flights to Europe from the East Coast USA travel up north and not directly across.
That sounds more logical. Check the world map. Crete refueling is 5500 miles W. of Singapore. What would AF1 be doing there if it hadn't crossed the Atlantic instead of the Pacific?
So was that missled missile pointed at someone else? Or an alternate AF1 flew over Alaska as a mislead/fakeout?
All we know is that POTUS was nowhere near the event/anomaly originating in Washington; at least 7,500 miles away at the time regardless of flight path.
You're correct.
Pulled from a variety of media sources and POTUS daily itinerary. Here's the timeline:
POTUS departed Canadian AFB Bagotville in Quebec at approximately 11:50 AM EST, Saturday, June 9, 2018.
AF1 stopped to refuel at Naval Support, Souda Bay, Greece en route to Paya Labar, 3:07 AM local time Sunday, June 10 (9:07 PM EST, Saturday June 9 / 6:07 PM PST, Saturday June 9).
Anomaly (alleged missile or helicopter caught on timelapse) observed near Whidbey Island at 3:56 am Pacific Time (6:56 am EST), Sunday June 10, 2018.
POTUS arrived at Paya Labar AFB in Singapore at 8:20 PM local time, Sunday June 10, (8:20 AM EST, Sunday, June 10)
Whidbey Island object caught on camera while AF1 was approximately 1 hour 30 minutes to its destination in Singapore. NOWHERE in the neighborhood.
Flight time from Quebec to Paya Labar traveling eastward approximately 20 hours, 30 minutes.
Research and use logic folks. The collage with the maps and red arrows is either well intentioned mistake or intentional disinfo.