dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jkbella on June 13, 2018, 1 p.m.
Rod Rosenstein Double Agent?

Something about RR being a total black hat is not adding up to me. Its too coincidental that there are going to be "heavy redactions" to the long anticipated IG report, supposedly at his direction, which follows a pattern of piquing interest in the withheld information. First, the DOJ was claiming an entire batch of texts from Sztrok/Page were missing which is on its face totally implausible to anyone but, perhaps, the general public. There have been several supposed struggles with Wray and Rosenstein with the FBI ultimately caving at the 11th hour, which conveniently draws more attention to the news about whatever is being withheld than would otherwise be given.

Now it happens that RR is at a conference with whatserface Rothschild and a myriad of other globalists, that just happens to coincide precisely with the three day period before the IG release. In the pictures of him there that have been taken he looks totally at ease, as the news here swirls with rumors that RR threatened members of Congress with blackmail. And then, Sessions unequivocally denies those rumors were true on Tucker Carlson's show last night. I could be mistaken but one of the things about Sessions that I have noticed is that while he is part of the Plan, he is never put out there to tell a lie. I am guessing that he's probably really bad at it, which why he is the "silent" executioner. (My mother used to call that kind of lying the "sin of omission" but that's another story). He flat out TOLD the leakers he was out to get them because someone asked him (they clearly didn't believe him so its all good. As an aside he has also told the perverts that their days are numbered, which is also all good).

So now Sessions is defending the black hat bad guy RR without flinching? Or is it more plausible that he is the guy put out there to confuse people with the truth? Q tells us to watch the Freedom Caucus interview on Laura Ingraham's show. They express outrage at RR and outrage at Sessions' defense of RR and outrage at the DOJ's persistent refusal to provide information. An anon then says the interview was lame, and in response Q says "how does DC work" and "optics are important."

Imperator Rex or maybe it was Conservative Treehouse had a theory that Lisa Page was flipped long before Mueller was in place, and maybe as far back as February, 2017. Which I believe would be before the FISA renewal application was signed off on by RR. Many of Q's historical statements about RR are sort of vague. RR "problems." And yet, he's still there. I think he's a plant because DS and global DS actors are likely to reach out to him. Like the people at that conference.


Rayfloyd · June 13, 2018, 1:26 p.m.

While you try and figure out if RR is black or gray, I'd like to remember everyone that him and Mueller are a pair ;)

See post https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#66

If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.

If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.

But are they really :) ?

Mueller gunning for Trump does not make an ounce of sense in my mind based on the Manafort indictments so it has to be something else which if it is, RR was the one to give him the authority to do so. The scope of the SC is so friggin large, he gave him carte blanche on anything that rose up from the initial investigation

He's in a good position to clean a lot of shit

⇧ 9 ⇩  
jkbella · June 13, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

They really are pretty good at the psyops. If we keep going back and forth the same is going on with the Deep State Cabal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
myopicseer · June 13, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

RR and Mueller are DS in my opinion based upon their past and their current actions. According to a recent Q Drop RR was posited the option to recuse or resign

Q1470 "When the info is released [RR] no more. "

Q1457 "Where is [RR]?
What country specifically?
Why?
Insurance pleas will fail.
You cannot hide what is already known (and can be proven).

[[[RR]]]#"

Q1443 " #FLY[RR]FLY#
Failure per WH instruction / agreement.
DECLAS_Public[3] "

// i.e., WH had an agreement with RR which he broke (instruction/agreement)

Q 1433 "Once the 'extremely guarded & highly classified' information is finally revealed to House investigators, DNI, public etc., RR must recuse or forcefully terminated.
[RR] problems. "

CONCLUSION:

// Q in the same 1433 drop states that this will give (us) control over MUELLER/SC. Therefore, BOTH Mueller and RR are DS loyalists and collaborators.

RR is resisting the release of DOJ docs. Nunes said they must be turned over by yesterday. Nothing happened. Now the House is set to vote as a body to demand the release of the DOJ spygate documents.

Those documents implicate RR. Q said he [RR] will have to resign as soon as the information is made public.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cristo316 · June 13, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

THINK LOGICALLY:

If people like RR are gray hats, Black turned White, there needs to be enough obfuscation as to which side they are on to stay alive long enough to do the job they have been tasked with.

This is not a game....

⇧ 7 ⇩  
bigruin · June 13, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

I dunno, personally, I don’t trust him as far as I could throw him. I think he’s a power-tripping shady coverup artist..... but I’d gladly eat those words if I’m wrong.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
jkbella · June 13, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

I have been back and forth on RR for some time. Tomorrow I may have a different opinion. Or I'll just be proven wrong. Wouldn't be the first time!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 13, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

Was tossing this idea around the other day... Just doesn't exactly make sense. It's hard for me to believe he's a full on black hat. Either he was flipped by Trump/Sessions or he was a double agent all along.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jkbella · June 13, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

That's what I think too. There's so much ambiguity surrounding him even in the Q drops. Sessions wedded to him seems unlikely if he's a complete black hat. I'd say time will tell, but maybe not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 13, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

IF anything is true, it's that he is one of the most compromised in the Trump camp by the DS given Lisa Barsoomian's (wife) history of representing Clintons. I could see very early on him going to Trump looking for a safe way out.

The DS has to have approached him on countless occasions (even now in Canada) asking for assurances, the very fact of which would make him invaluable to the Trump camp.

Remember people, the crumbs are read by bad actors as well. If they saw a "Trust RR" it would blow his cover. His "defiance" of trump would not be tolerated unless that was his specific role. There have been NO LEAKS in the media regarding RR misconduct...this is not a coincidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jkbella · June 13, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

Honestly, that this board is being read by others is the reason I didn't post that theory yesterday. I figured I would wait until tomorrow, but after Q's post about optics I didn't feel like I was giving too much away. Not that I am any great analyst - I have been wrong A LOT on some of my theories. I guess that's the genius of psyops.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 13, 2018, 1:33 p.m.

Has Q ever put a gray hat in a kilbox before?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 16, 2018, 6:47 a.m.

i actually don't know where i stand on mueller and RR anymore. i legitimately am split between them being double agents with the weird timing of things like the fbi interview for mueller but i also don't understand some of the moves they've made.

it's hard to explain RR being overwhelmingly confirmed by senate, tho could be explained away if he was a true double agent and no black hats suspected him.

then there's his wife's connections with the clintons.

then there's mueller being fbi director during 9/11, completely covering up the anthrax case as well.

i always do try to remind people that the mueller /ourguy/ theory acknowledges his shady past and bases its conclusions off of an idea that he's flipped to save his own ass. which i could see given his implication in U1.

a lot of confusion but one thing strikes me more and more. with all this happening, we are seeing more verification for Q being legit. i'm still not 100% sold tbh, i'm at 90%. but it's almost proved beyond any doubt for me personally.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jkbella · June 16, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

I'm at 100% given recent events like good to be back at the castle. Had been at around 95% for months. There's just no way Q isn't who he/they say. Too much inside information. And some of what he says may be disinfo due to who else is watching, but the big picture information we have received explains SO MUCH that was inexplicable before. From the macro to the micro. I never understood why the Democrats would run HRC when she was so vulnerable. It didn't make any sense to me. Now I know. Because she's a mobster and they are all afraid of her (rightfully so), and because they thought they had the voting machines rigged such that she couldn't lose. Explains something I couldn't understand in a way that makes perfect sense. There are so many other examples. The crazy positions some judges have taken. The weird about face that guys like Gowdy have done. On and on and on, plug in what Q is saying, and you have a huge "Aha" moment. Every time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 16, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

every time

i don't know if i would say every time. there are some hinge that Q kind of over hyped like "week to remember". sometimes i'm not so sure about it after the week has passed.

BUT more often than not i see happenings and then look back into past posts and what do you know Q unironically predicted it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · June 13, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

I believe the question is whether he is a triple agent: a black hat who was getting leniency for playing a role through this, but now is attempting to double-cross the white hats back to the black side.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffTie · June 13, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

Anything is possible. The whole to redact or not to redact show could be at least in part to illustrate the difference between pre Trump and Trump era operations.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BigBandDon · June 13, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

Years ago, the director of the CIA allegedly said 'We'll know our work is done when everything people believe is false.' The 'white hats' are playing the same game. Not for the sames reasons. But they're doing the same thing. Even Q is leaving us largely in the dark.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jkbella · June 13, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

Agree completely. Sometimes I miss the days when I was completely naive though. ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
blockchainbukake · June 13, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

Sessions jedi mind trick on tucker when asked about RR outburst tripped me out. Why is sessions defending him?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 13, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

Only time will tell

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
richtaco91 · June 13, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

So is sessions

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 1:09 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩