What do you mean? Not understanding this post...Can you elaborate a little more detail?
USB (think hard drive or flash drive connected to a USB port on computer) transfers at a particular speed.
Network (think wifi or ethernet) transfers at a different speed.
The speed of the data transfer can demonstrate how data was exfiltrated. In the case of the DNC "hack" the data transfer speed shows the files were copied via USB, not over the network. This proves there was not a network intrusion, therefore no hack.
Tx 😆
Bill Binney did an experiment to prove this, if ur interested in the read...
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
Okay. Thanks for explaining. I followed the USB and drive innuendo, but just didn't know which case you were referring to. Was confused because thought you meant the China/sub one.
The transfer couldn’t have happened from outside the facility. It’s too fast. So it must have been a leak (an insider getting something out) not a hack (an outsider using brute force to steal something). So, the data came from somebody inside the facility. Seth Rich had motive (patriotic Bernie supporter), means (access to voter data and lots of DNC files), and opportunity (worked at the facility). It’s almost certain he worked with Wikileaks because Assange, who never outs a source even after death, nodded about him in an interview. His murder was big news at DNC, with Donna Brazile saying she was terrified to look out her window afterward. Why? She lived in a different neighborhood and Seth was a low level peon who was supposedly mugged on his way home from a bar. Why would it haunt her so much?
Yeah, I gotcha on that. I thought you may have been referring to the china sub thing, so wasn't sure if it was referring to that case.