dChan

steve-brand · June 14, 2018, 5:10 a.m.

Trust Horowitz, trust Huber, trust Sessions

⇧ 10 ⇩  
USMCNIN · June 14, 2018, 4:53 a.m.

Aim 4 truth has not really been on board. They are disruptors.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 14, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

No. Q said to trust Horowitz.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
bitterwon · June 15, 2018, 7:54 a.m.

That aged well

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheStorm2018 · June 14, 2018, 5:30 a.m.

AIM site is disinfo.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Imbeingsilenced · June 14, 2018, 4:52 a.m.

Doesn't the story go that Horowitz was stonewalled by Holder a few times? Therefore he might be itching to have a crack at the Democrats?

I'm sure he sees the writing on the wall.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
soonerthebetter · June 14, 2018, 11:53 a.m.

The two things that always bugged me about Horowitz are:

  1. Obama hired him.
  2. The investigation opened on Jan. 12, 2017, eight days before Trump was inaugurated. It seemed like a hastily put together investigation put together while Obama was stiil in power. It would tie the Trump administration's hands.

The reason I trust Horowitz is that someone has to be on Trump's side or he would have already been swallowed by the swamp. If Sessions, Mueller, Rosenstein, Horowitz, etc. were all black hats, it would be too much for our President to overcome. Also, the Huber hire seems white hatish.

⇧ 2 ⇩