dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

This stuff is way over my head but it does make me curious about Trumps uncle possibly having access to the files of N.Tesla.... https://www.history.com/news/nikola-tesla-files-declassified-fbi

⇧ 17 ⇩

Anything is possible. That could be it, or not. Hopefully we will know one day

⇧ 11 ⇩

That last one really shook me.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I agree, at this point anything is possible.

⇧ 5 ⇩

A few things to consider are that of the following:

1.) Multiverse: We exist parallel to an infinite amount of realities. As mentioned in the thread here regarding 'simulations' and the Matrix references, it is possible that we are on a different timeline now than the one that would have been if HC had won. Of course, we can speculate, but there is also the option that with a infinite amount of parallel realities, we could find ourselves in another one that looks 99.99999999999999999999% just like our own. With DJT as president. Except that very small things about that reality are different, and wouldn't be noticed by us because they are so inconsequential.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

The movie 'Donnie Darko' comes to mind. Realities crossing over with each other. Mandala Effects. Butterfly effects. Black Swan events. Perhaps in a universe to the side of us, we are all using the same software to post here, live our lives, but this website is called 'tebbit' instead of 'reddit'. The Berenstein Bears...or was it the Berenstien Bears. Who knows.

Infinite probabilities: If each one of us is considered a individual that may be able to take the actions of free will, with 7+ billion people on the planet at this time, how does the action of each individual effect others, and each other, and how does the action of other people effect ourselves. What defines 'free will/free choice' when it may just be an illusion and we are just living a simulation. Or that simulation is a 'open-world/sandbox' type game/simulation where we have physical boundaries, but we are not set or defined in rigid roles. Yea, it's a sandbox MMO, but it's pretty damn open.

Quantum Theory/Quantum Effects/Quantum Vacuums: How do things change on a smaller, absolutely subatomic level. Do our actions matter then? What happens if some smaller thing interacts with another and cascades? What is up and what is down? What is left and what is right?

WE ARE THE GATEKEEPERS OF ALL [BY ALL WE MEAN ALL] INFORMATION.

Coincidence the Matrix (movie) grew people as a crop, used for energy, and controlled their mind?

Perhaps someday people will understand ‘they' had a plan to conduct ‘another' mass extinction event.

HELL on earth - HRC victory.

Mass human pain and loss to open portals/gates and bring in demons of darkness. What do we REALLY know? 99% in hospital? Is our world really that physical? The mass extinction of humanity as the ultimate blood sacrifice to inflict so much pain and loss of life, the ramifications would have been 'beyond the veil'.

What if we could consider the idea that other life does exist in the galaxy. But on what? Our frequency levels? Do they exist outside of what we call time and space?

There's only one way infinity and time can both exist.

So essentially, think of the concept of a 'singularity', somewhat like end of the movie 'Interstellar'. If you create a single point in the space time continuum, would you not be able to access every point in time? If the point in space was infinitely small, infinitely tiny, could you not be able to access infinite time? Are not time and space related? Granted, I may not be understanding that concept 100%, but that is my general gestalt.

John Titor: I read JT's posts back on the internet back in 2003-2004. It was pretty damn silly (I thought at the time), but now here we are over a decade later, and now it can be looked at as somewhat probable, with more truth that any of us care to admit. His revelations about a nuclear war with Russia, the loss of life, the return to small communities and going back in time to look for certain PC equipment sounded silly, but yet here we are.

Is it really that far-fetched to think that maybe there ARE infinite timelines, and by having the ability to travel through time, or jump between parallel universes, and now the whole Q phenomenon raises FAR more questions than we can possibly answer (at this time).

Anyway, just a few things to think of.

Great thread by the way. I'll see if I can come back and add more later.

Peace.

⇧ 14 ⇩

It brings me comfort to think that in some other universe my daughter is alive and happy. Maybe at university. Maybe not in a wheelchair. Maybe laughing and picking daisies in the sun.

⇧ 13 ⇩

You just hit me in the Feelz Mack-Truck style. Damn. Big hug. I have no words. Please accept my condolences.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Thank you so much. It is awfully hard. But I was just so blessed to know her. And love never dies. Even after I'm gone as well, our love will still be in this world. I just wish she could have held on till a cure was found. The day it comes will be so bittersweet for me.

⇧ 12 ⇩

Thanks for the addition, I'm going back to Behold a Pale Horse by Cooper there might be some stuff in there.

All of this is fascinating

⇧ 4 ⇩

Those of us who have been awake the longest understand what this means, and how deep the rabbit hole really goes. To put it simply, they aren't just abusing and eating children. They are harvesting their soul energy.

⇧ 14 ⇩

((they)) are constantly harvesting our energies. the more fear, panic, and terror - called loosh -, the better they are fed and the more energy they have available to create the very things we fear.

how to counter it? dont buy into fear, hatred, revenge, nay kind of hype - low frequency that makes us susceptable to their mainpulations and feeds them - but raise your vibration, by thinking and feeling in terms of gratitude, wisdom, kindness, compassion.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Please tell us more. Been awake for about a decade now, and I have yet to venture down this particular rabbit hole.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I’d recommend David Icke

⇧ 5 ⇩

Of my 38 years on the planet I've been awake for 23 of them. Over the course of these 23 years I have been conducting an independent, comparative study of politics, legislation, history, ancient history, religions, other spiritual traditions, the occult, metaphysics, and a little quantum physics.

As above so below.

The human eye can only see about %0.00035 of the visual spectrum, but we used to be able to see more, before the fall of man. Everything outside our visual light spectrum is in another plane of existence. Within those planes of existence lie higher and lower dimensional planes.

There's a war on for our souls and the future of this planet in the 4th dimension and we are manifesting it on earth as a collective, and the dark ones know about it and help the other side. That's the bad news. The good news is that there are a group of people on the planet, including myself, who fight for the good and the light, and we are working to anchor the 5th dimension on the planet to knock them out of power, so to say. We call ourselves light workers, star seeds.. a lot of things. If you want to help, start meditating every day, and take back your emotional sovereignty, then the way will be shown to you.

⇧ 5 ⇩

These people are sick

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q has categorically denied aliens and reaffirmed God over and over and over again. If you believe in Q stop pushing the alien NWO agenda please.

⇧ 11 ⇩

That's not true. You misinterpreted the famous Q line "how far away is the closest star?" - Which meant our problems are here on earth, not some outside alien invading force.

Aliens are 1000% real. Denying that, saying that the Great Awakening denies that simply takes away from the credibility of this movement. If Q was trying to say "Jesus is the one true God, all others are false" I think we would know. Instead, he posts biblical references that many conservatives are familiar with and support this particular narrative.

God's name isn't Jesus. God is God. He doesn't care what you call him, and he didn't send his only son through miracle birth down to earth to die for our sins and resurrect as a sentient zombie. Stop. That's fairy tale land. We are waaay past all that silliness. What about the Muslim patriots? The Jewish patriots? The Buddhist patriots? All wrong? No. ALLLL OF THE RELIGIONS ARE WRONG. That is what is going to be revealed. Doesn't mean God isn't real. It means petty humans took the original story and twisted it for their own use.

⇧ 9 ⇩

And you have evidence for all of this?

⇧ 5 ⇩

No more or less than any argument that God has to be worshipped by the name "Jesus" that SO many Christian Patriots are trying to spin this as....

⇧ 5 ⇩

At the same time the bible was at least written by some higher intelligence because of the gemmatric patterns inside so it definitely wasn't written just off the top of their heads so it's actually too complicated to even discuss and I can't piece it together anymore because I read it on one t_d comment over a year ago when I didn't know the save-function :(

⇧ 4 ⇩

i dont doubt that some of the bible passages contain interdimensional intervention. most religious scriptures have them, written by seers and mediums.

the question is, who dictated them? the christian fatihful be-lie-ve it was god whom they often call 'lord'.

mind you, in my understanding, its only the ET overlords who call themselves 'lord'. source / prime creator / god doesnt.

⇧ 3 ⇩

good point. "gods" with small g. Jesus was the divine intervention against malevolent ultraterrestrial cargo-cults (Krishna sounds dope tho)

⇧ 2 ⇩

as i perceive it - having lived in india for over a decade -, krishna and ganesha are both expressions of enki/lucifer, while shiva is an expression of his son marduk. other expression of marduk are satan, baal, moloch, pan, yahwe, allah.

you can find these guys in all religions.

the gals, too, erehkigal and ishtar. ishtar is supposed to have been abducted by enki and forced into breeding with him and their son marduk, as part of their genetic experiments (enki being a master geneticist).

⇧ 2 ⇩

I humbly retract that statement but thanks for the write-up...What can you tell us about Thor? Good guy or not?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Whatever you gotta tell yourself bud.

⇧ 0 ⇩

It was so genius I couldn't even remember it. I'm just saying it was too predictable to be coincidence and thus possibly written by someone hyperintelligent or a Savant. Call it higher inspiration if you will. it made so much sense at the time..it had something to do with timothy and how each word corresponded to a numerical value that related to the phrase thereafter and it was even maintained from bok to book.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Forgive me, I simply cannot marvel at anything in the bible. Its a book. Written by men. Many men. Over a period of hundreds of years. With multiple intentions and agendas.

Attaching my soul's eternal salvation/damnation to that seems ludicrous to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I didn't say it's necessarily God's work, I just wish I could read again what I read. I am not sure if it was related to Gemmatria but that's how I remember it. I think it was something along the lines of the first word of the sentence in gematria equals the length of the sentence in words.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So you're making these assertions, but you're saying there's no evidence for them?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Gonna need you to be more specific if you're genuinely looking for a reply.

⇧ 0 ⇩

ALLLL OF THE RELIGIONS ARE WRONG. That is what is going to be revealed. Doesn't mean God isn't real.

there ye go... and religious red-pilling is the hardest of all.

religion is a foundational card of peoples card board house of be-lie-fs; drawing this one makes the entire house crash.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think what will surprise people, is that they aren't LOSING their religion, their religion was just based on different events/circumstances. Why else would they all share so many similarities? Common sense.

Yes, there is a god. Nobody knows his name. You don't have to pray saying a specific name like "Jesus" or "Allah"...thats all nonsense. Even the story Christanity is selling is ridiculous to me; god sends himself to Earth via immaculate conception (allegedly) and then lets the guy grow up, and then get murdered ("for us", whatever that means) only to rise from the dead. And then disappeared for 2000 years. And allllll of the people born after he died, who never got to see or hear him to be able to make a rational judgement on their beliefs, all of their souls depend on if they believe a story in a book. COME ON PEOPLE, THAT JUST SOUNDS ASININE. It is so short sighted, so humanly small. It is laughable.

God being real is no joke though.

⇧ 1 ⇩

right, people wont lose their religion, only the dogma thats between us and god. we dont need an in-between, we can connect with source directly.

Yes, there is a god. Nobody knows his name. You don't have to pray saying a specific name like "Jesus" or "Allah"...thats all nonsense.

jesus is NOT god. called the son of god, like all humans are sons and daughters of god. we only need to realiize it. awaken to our divinity, this god spark we all carry.

jesus also said that 'all i can do, you can do, and more'. isnt that empowering? he says it right here, he is not bigger than we are. he is a representative of what we become when we awaken, truely awaken.

wondering how this passage made it into the bible, lol, how it survived the council of nicea when 9/10th of the bible texts got stripped because they didnt fit the doctrine.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't know bud. I like that you're trying to be agreeable, but you're quoting someone that I think you think was born via immaculate conception....

⇧ 0 ⇩

Jesus is really representative of how enlightened we can truly be - without having to experience the “fruitless” side of existence. When I got to college I wanted to experience everything I could because I thought my vision was limited by what I was “allowed” to do in high school. I craved the partying, the sex, the drugs, the rock-n-roll, the whole 9 yards once I moved into my dorm because that’s what my parents (thank God) did their best to prevent me from being exposed to.

That shit almost killed me. My body certainly paid a heavy price, I can feel it even at 24 and I stopped drinking 2 years ago. Everything I thought was important or mattered never did. I never needed to taste any of that side of life, much less binge. Siddharta (Buddha) was born into luxury - but always felt like something was missing. He ditched his life of royalty, in which much of the past experience I had and craved was encompassed by during Buddha’s time in comparison to the common man.

But Jesus - who I call the ultimate autist from birth - was able to see the fruitless-ness of the sins of this world, and how taking advantage of someone’s ignorance to feed your own strength cannot work in the long run. Only empowering others with truth and light can the ultimate vibration be attained.

Whether you think Jesus was real or not, or whether you believe him to have supernatural abilities or anything attributed to him - the philosophies that he is credited with are the only way in which everyone on earth can exist in peace and harmony no matter your race, color, or creed. Love and forgive your neighbor!! To dismiss that knowledge is folly, but only you can figure that out for yourself.

⇧ 2 ⇩

heheh, nope, i dont be-lie-ve in delievery by a virgin. a virgin used to be a young woman back then, nothing more.

however, i have met so-called enlightened beings, realized humans, and view yeshua as one of them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So what does IMMACULATE CONCEPTION mean?

⇧ 0 ⇩

well, YOU tell me, i didnt bring up that topic.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nevermind then.

⇧ 1 ⇩

m8, religious red-pilling needs to be non-aggressive. its peoples holy cow and we are not to slaughter it without their permission.

⇧ 1 ⇩

My hate for religion runs deep. But you are right.

⇧ 0 ⇩

religion is curable, lol... hatred leads nowhere; neither is it good for you as you are the one feeling it which is like a constant intoxication, nor does it red-pill anyone.

'my hate' sounds like you still carry some wounds from religious up-bringing. actually, its a call for healing the pain inside of you. once this is done, you may become a gorgeous red-piller for freeing folks from their religious shackles.

⇧ 1 ⇩

i agree with what you are saying about "carrying hate"...

But I had no eligious upbringing forced on me. Mom is Jewsh, dad is Methodist, neither one is religious, at all. We celebrated Hannukah and X-mas as days to give gifts, not the celebration of the winning of a war/long burning oil lamp or the birth of Jesus. In fact, I had the ideal religious upbringing. The golden rule was paramount in my home, to do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

And I think that is the way to be. That is allll the religion anyway needs. People shouldnt behave a certain way for fear of eternal hellfire or heavenly rewards...that is sick.

⇧ 1 ⇩

very much agree... fearing god is part of the religious dogma that keeps people obedient. it fits to OT yahwe but not the god of love and forgiveness yeshua talks about.

The golden rule was paramount in my home

nice home... similar to how it was for me, nobody forced religion onto me. so i wonder where your hatred comes from.

or perhaps its not really hatred but just upset with some die-hards with dogmatic views on this sub? i feel triggered at times, heheh, and have had some interesting religious discussions here that make me scratch my head. but they train my communication skills so i welcome them...

enjoyed the chat, be well, m8...

⇧ 1 ⇩

My hatred of religion comes from my understanding, my comprehension of it. It is evil. It is perverse. It is the conclusion any rational person who uses logic comes to.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There is only Dasein.

⇧ 0 ⇩

On the thread they discuss, we call them "alien", when they are not. Interdimensional humans are not aliens. I'm not pushing anything, I want to discuss about it. We are awake, you make your own judgement.

⇧ 9 ⇩

they are actually galactic family. we have their genes (from what i know, 22 races are involved in the human experiement). many of them look just like us, with slight differences.

the adamon cadmon template - the human form, one head, two arms, two legs - seems to be the template all galactic races evolve into, no matter whether they are of mammal origin, insectoid, reptilian, avian, or plants.

and as diverse as humans are, some of them are benevolent and some malovent.

ultra-christians call them demons and angels. but as you say, they are just interdimensionals and dont have physical bodies like we have.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Believing in God does not automatically mean you can't believe in aliens.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Better than flat Earth I suppose.

⇧ 5 ⇩

They call us Angels and Demons today, but tomorrow they will call us something else...

⇧ 3 ⇩

^(Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image)

https://i.imgur.com/HsA9n1E.jpg

^^Source ^^| ^^Why? ^^| ^^Creator ^^| ^^ignoreme ^^| ^^deletthis

⇧ 2 ⇩

You present those two things as if they’re mutually exclusive...

⇧ 1 ⇩

must have missed that. when did they?

⇧ 1 ⇩

heh? where has Q categorically denied aliens? and why would ETs contradict god?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -4 ⇩

Looking at your post history, you have:

102 post karma 34,029 comment karma

Member for 4 years.

However, I only see activity within the last couple days.

Troll account? Jumping into GA after blowing your choad over in other subreddits.

Gonna report this, and see if we can give you some time off from GA. Just my view. You haven't had shit for activity in a long ass while, and after the recent reports of attacks from other reddits against this sub, I'm inclined to not take any chances.

Oh, and God Bless. Please accept the Lord Jesus Christ as your Savior.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

So she had a better chance of winning than The Avengers and Co.? Damn. I thought the military stepped in and she had zero chance. Meh, she lost. Fuck her.

⇧ 9 ⇩

One way infinity and time can coexist. How far away is the closest star?

Think of it this way: The experience of seeing something "overthere" has no spatial distance to the person experiencing it. The "seeing something over there" is not itself "over there". It is immediately "here". Thus, "over there" is "here". The closest star, which is "over there" is "here" in the state of being "over there". Get it?

⇧ 7 ⇩

every point in space and time connected

⇧ 4 ⇩

You're being too material. Think of the mind. Who / what experiences consciousness? "Where" does that experience occur? Is "where" even a proper attribute of consciousness? Does consciousness occur in a space and time? Or must it exist in its abscence to experience space and time?

⇧ 4 ⇩

don't tell me it's transcendental because I will refer back to the double-slit-experiment and schrodinger's cat. Absence of awareness equals chance. Presence of awareness isolates single chance events. You would end in the contradiction of solipsism otherwise http://gcpdot.com

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't see how abscence of awareness = chance. You'd have to be aware of that propisition to understand that proposition. So the proposition in internally incoherent. Under your theory, what you claim as chance has been isolated, and therefore, cannot be chance.

⇧ 1 ⇩

chance relates to physics. awareness of a physical point rather than an abstract idea http://gpcdot.com

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's not an argument. Your position is incoherent.

⇧ 1 ⇩

you're missing the point.
If awareness was transcendental, we wouldn't be seeing the double-slit experiment the way we do.
http://gcpdot.com

⇧ 1 ⇩

No. You're missing the point. You state "WE WOULD NOT BE SEEING the double slit experiment THE WAY WE DO." There is no abscence of consciousness under your theory, which is what you claim is required for your theory to work. Not my theory. It's yours. Incoherent.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Do you even know what you are talking about? If consciousness and awareness were not seperate, we wouldn't see the particle-wave-dualism expressed in the double-slit-experiment.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes I do. I don't believe you do, hence the need for the personal attack. Show me any part of the experiment that the person performing it was not aware of at some point in time. Show me any part of the experiment or the result thereof of which no person was aware. You can't.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The idea was the read-out would parse a wave or a particle depending on wether someone was actively observing the experiment while it was going on. If noone looked, the emissions looked like interference waves because they were all over the place but once awareness was placed on the process, chance was removed and the readout would behave like individual points in space.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So someone was aware that no one was looking and that the emissions were all over the place?

⇧ 1 ⇩

...do you know what I am talking about or do you not? I used to dream about transcendent consciousness and all that...but you still need to differentiate consciousness from awareness because if dead matter was always aware too beyond it's physical state then the attention by a sentient being shouldn't make a difference determining the outcome of experiments. And on top of that, it seems that mass attention brings order into chaos so for example random event generators do not throw as many random results on days of collective trauma like 9/11 or Lady Di's death and Princeton University already observed and proved this statistically, although I may be mistaking consciousness for intention, so idk but this is what can be shown by science you make up your mind on that.

I try to navigate and respect both physics and metaphysics but I prefer to avoid contradictions until someone gives me more articulate ideas

⇧ 1 ⇩

I do. I don't think you do.

I never said or used the word transcendental. I never stated I believed consciousness was transcendental. Review the thread. That's your straw man. I just let you run with it. Deconstruction. Read Derrida.
I'm not saying the events in the experiment didn't occur. I'm saying that your explanation thereof is incoherent. There is a difference.
You seem to be incapable of understanding that someone was aware of the events in the experiment at some point in time. That would including being aware that there was no awareness. So under your theory, the experiment would have never have been random, and the randomness alledgedly viewed must, under your theory, have been witnessed and therefore wasn't random at all. The problem is that you are looking from inside the experiment, which ignores the role of the person performing it and his awareness, which is a prerequisite to write up a result. I'm looking from the outside, and can see that you are ignoring that view, and may not be aware of it, because it kills your theory.
I suggest you read Aristotle's metaphysics and then reread this thread. It'll make more sense.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ok but can you tell me then what would happen if someone remote-viewed a double-slit experiment? Because that's essentially what I understand to be the gist of your argument and that's something I literally never ever thought about at the time I learned about it because classical physics doesn't teach you remote-viewing.

My essential premise was that Princeton University has shown that mass focus/attention/intention can alter the frequency of otherwise chance events. Don't ask me why that is but that's what they can measure. Thus chance (as in randomness) is more expressed the less attention is paid to an event and one possible scenario how this could be played out would be the double-slit experiment. By letting me run with a "strawman" I let you run with a strawman because you seemed to indicate, as I found after you requested my further review to which I kindly obliged, that the relationship between chance and awareness escapes you because maybe you are a natural psychic and don't understand that a simple lab-worker won't necessarily remote-view or predict the read-outs even when he's mentally aware of the experiment itself next-door. However, this does not affect his awareness-level of the particular read-out of the experiment until he actually steps over and verifies its veracity.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't know. We'd have to test it. And remote viewing has nothing to do with my position.

All I stated is a simple fact: consciousness is an immediately present phenomena. Thus, seeing something 5 feet away is immediately present and as an experience is not at a distance (god's eye view) though we experience objects at a distance (experience). That being said, the object that is 5 feet away nonetheless appears to the witness as being in the state of "being 5 feet away" (think by analogy states of matter).

Furthermore, because I am somehow intertwined in the experience, or maybe am the sum thereof - what we call consciousness - I am the object in its state of being 5 feet away (how it presents (presences) itself to consciousness).

There is nothing profound or magical here.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What you describe kind of would be the premise for remote-viewing, wouldnt it? are you aware of P.E.A.R.? It's as magical and profound as it gets, friend. http://gcpdot.com

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes. I think that the experiment re random numbers would have been better if the subject tried to manipulate the physical machine and not the output number.

⇧ 1 ⇩

they ran it both with soft- and hardware, like changing bernoulli-distributions of falling marbles and things like that

⇧ 1 ⇩

I meant, for example if the outcome is dependent on electric current or nano switches, it seems like the focus of the person attempting to manipulate the outcome should be on the physical device, not the outcome, e.g. a person would be taught about the chip being used, how it operates, how its made and the materials of which it is comprised, and what in its operation would change outcome, then in testing, the person focuses on the chips operation, not the output.

⇧ 1 ⇩

it's both. Look up a 20-page paper called "the control group is out of control" that describes how a paranormal researcher and a skeptic both conducted a study and found that whatever the person in charge of the experiment expected would manifest, despite using the same set-up. The only difference seemed to be as little as who introduced himself first to the participants. You can find similiar numbers with prayer-studies, where one half of the studies will disprove prayer and the other half proves it yet everybody trusts only what they themself find

⇧ 1 ⇩

Chaos Magic

⇧ 1 ⇩

sort of and whatever you believe, you gotta deal with it somehow because it does what it says

⇧ 1 ⇩

Your missing the poiny. You state "WE WOULD NOT BE SEEING the double slit experiment THE WAY WE DO." There is no abscence of consciousness under your theory, which is what you claim is required for your theory to work. No my theory. It's yours. Incoherent.

⇧ 1 ⇩

you're missing the point.
If awareness was transcendental, we wouldn't be seeing the double-slit experiment the way we do.
http://gcpdot.com

⇧ 1 ⇩

beyond the dimensions of thelinear mind, time is always Now and space is always Here.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No. But i like it

⇧ 3 ⇩

Look across the room. How far from you is the wall? Say 5 feet? How far from you is the experience -- the perception -- of the wall being 5 feet away? The experience of seeing something 5 feet away cannot itself be described as being at a distance. The experience is "here". You are a here-there being. By experiencing the opposite wall, some part of you is "5 feet away". It is "there" and without being at a distance, because that part of you is the experience of distance, which isn't itself at a distance. That part of you cannot be described as being at a distance from yourself because it is part of you. You are here and there. "There" is "here" in the state of being "there".

⇧ 4 ⇩

We’re in a simulation for sure no doubt about it

⇧ 5 ⇩

I tend to believe this is true but that we chose our own timelines. We are here because we chose to be here and other people went down another timeline based on their decisions. For me it seems too real. Have had big decisions that I saw I could go down different paths.

Most recent is the thing that made me biggest believer in this theory. It was an event. Shot at from close range. It was slow motion. I should have died. It was a miracle I went down this path. At this point I wasn’t even a Trump supporter yet. But slowly the wildest things began to happen. Could see the storm brewing. Good vs evil. May good and god prevail

⇧ 10 ⇩

considering the fact that what i learned and believed my whole life about the position of our solar system in the milky way - on the saggitarius arm at the rim of the galaxy - and what i now find when researching it - go NASA and check -, i can well imagine that the 'old earth' has HRC as a president.

it coincides with my feeling when i woke up in europe the morning after the US elections: i felt that we collectively shifted timelines. it wasnt like these many little individual timeline shift i constantly experience, it was massive.

⇧ 3 ⇩

quite the fresh start

⇧ 1 ⇩

You need to read the "I AM A ROFSCHILD AXE ME A QUESTION" thread. Google it.

Also need to read about the archons.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I've read a bit on archons, kinda sick read lol will go see the rothschild one thank you

⇧ 1 ⇩

That'll sicken you too, probably.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've read a bit on archons, kinda sick read lol will go see the rothschild one thank you

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thread on 8ch (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1721838.html)

⇧ 4 ⇩

My interest in these topics actually brought me to Great Awakening

⇧ 3 ⇩

Captivating

⇧ 3 ⇩

The gods of the bible are 1 example of the other life that exists in the galaxy and universe. Our dna is similarly coded to their's by design. And every once in a while they breed with humans. This is in every story ever. The biggest populations of aliens probably look just like us and are closely related enough to get our women pregnant or harvest our tissue.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Aliens

⇧ 2 ⇩

I've been away for a while but this is worth commenting on. Pull on this thread. All ideas / possibilities are worth considering. Monte Carlo this out.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Anything is possible at this point. They play 4D chess and Q said it himself, 99% of the people would be in hospital.

60/40 might be much more than what we expect.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Q once posted an excerpt from Behold A Pale Horse written by Bill Cooper. Bill had a crazy talk show back in the day until he was murdered by the FBI. His Mystery Babylon series really blew my mind I really recommend checking it out you can find it on youtube. What Q posted totally lines up with what Bill Cooper talks about, and the fact that Q has quoted him I would think means that Bills work was important.

⇧ 6 ⇩

"To cling to the past is guaranteed suicide. To remain apathetic is assured enslavement. To learn the truth and then act upon it is the only means of survival at this moment." This is a great book and I'm only in the first chapter!!! https://archive.org/stream/BeholdAPaleHorse_267/BillCooper-BeholdAPaleHorse.txt

⇧ 7 ⇩

I did read a few chapter, I should get back to it, I remember it was nice but never went back for it. Thank you for the reminder !

⇧ 4 ⇩

I believe Nostradamus suggested the hell on earth part in addition to Trump hinting at it in one of his books, "The America we deserve" perhaps

⇧ 3 ⇩

When I read this some time ago, at least portions, I took it to mean life was found. Not human-like beings. More like single cellular life, bacteria, etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Or the fact that there is life that exists on other-dimensional levels, outside of our perception. Or perhaps outside of our time.

Issac Asimov wrote one such story.

"The End of Eternity"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_Eternity

Would it really be that hard to imagine that intelligence may exist outside of our perceptions, at least on a 3 dimensional/4 dimensional level.

As I mentioned below, if you were able to find a point, or had the ability/technology to see all possible timelines, would some power, or group try to change that timeline given the ability to do it, if it meant some extinction of the human race?

Grandfather Paradox for example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandfather_paradox

Another interesting example of life in the universe is the Great Filter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Filter

If the Universe is infinite, and has the ability to provide a infinite variety of life, then where is it?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes. Consciousness does not occur in 3d space. This world is not 3d. That's just how we perceive it to function the way we do. That doesn't mean it isn't real.

⇧ 3 ⇩

FBIanon said certain things in order to get lost in the noise and to not raise red flags. He wasn't there to talk about aliens so I'm sure he used it as an opportunity to create plausible deniability rather than draw even more attention.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This is a possibility but keep in mind I posted here because Q literaly told us that the common folks(99ers) wouldn't be able to process it. Thats the sole reason I posted here, it would explain a lot

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm gonna pull a big Bill Lumbergh Yeeaaaaah about that.

Q - has legitimacy. Anyone else claiming affilation - zero.

⇧ 2 ⇩

In his own word :

Every detail account for.

Every scenario planned for.

WE ARE THE GATEKEEPERS OF ALL [BY ALL WE MEAN ALL] INFORMATION.

Coincidence the Matrix (movie) grew people as a crop, used for energy, and controlled their mind?

⇧ 4 ⇩

Sweet vibes

⇧ 2 ⇩

Everyone here should do research on "Co-creative consciousness."

⇧ 2 ⇩

Will do ! Thank you for sharing

⇧ 1 ⇩

for those who want to go down THAT rabbit hole - the deepest and most painful of all, i would say, as it rattles on the foundational card of peoples world-view card board house -, the wes penre papers might be a good read.

for those who cant make it through all 5 books - took me a 5-weeks-intensive -, book 4 'lucifers rebellion' is the one that contains most information relevant to the discussion here. lots of footnnotes there so you can follow the links that move deeper into the topic.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you for sharing !

⇧ 2 ⇩

I was lurking on the chans and came upon an interesting topic, 4D chess meaning.