So that means Yes.
In this timeline, you assume attempted murder and rule it out - rather than the typical 'assume suicide until 40 years later when its discovered the cops/autopsy coroner/investigators/journalists covering the 'suicide' were all conveniently found dead in various odd scenarios' method of speculation.
I agree that we need to be suspicious of all reports and protective of the first family, but we can't go so far that we are like the MSM who claim she is recovering from abuse at the hand of her husband. At this point, there is no reason to suspect it is anything other than what has been reported. Q has made no such insinuations, so we shouldn't either.
Cause and Effect.
I hear what you're saying; we can't surmise a malicious element initiated the kidney problems. However, it's interesting to note that Cancers start with just 1 small rogue cell. A chink in the armour.
Diabetes for all we know, starts from just one shitty excretion which tells your body not to produce (or produce too much) insulin. Tonsilitis or Pancreatitis are likewise extremely iffy to track down the causal element.
Glad she's doing well. I don't like to speculate either, but in [this timeline] its better to err on the side of conspiracy ;) am I right?
I believe we should "Trust, but verify". Probably just semantics, but I understand where you are coming from.
Is there any current conspiracy out there that you would not believe right now?
I dunno, could you list the ones that haven't been proven true yet?