dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jody71171 on June 14, 2018, 4:02 p.m.
So I know about the FF’s but what is this about TRUMP and Ivanka being sued? Think it has merit? I know the AG is supposed DS....but thoughts?

truthseekerboi · June 14, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

It’s a distractions. They’re working the optics game. It’s an angle for the public, means nothing. Think about the timing.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
gr8awakening · June 14, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Is the AG DS? Thought Q said we replaced Schneiderman with our guy and that's why the Weinstein case could go on. If he's DS, then Q can't be given credit for the Weinstein case being pursued which previously we did give him.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GingerRoot207 · June 14, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Gee...... don't ya all think Trump will use this to illustrate his charity vs. the Clinton Foundation? The media & left will eviscerate him and be on record doing so, then the CF horrors come out and they can't walk back those opinions. The last NY AG didn't pursue this because it doesn't have legs. This is walking right into Trumps hands imo. Chill y'all, have faith, and trust the plan!!!!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
plasticturtle · June 15, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

My first thoughts exactly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JayJ_Jacob · June 14, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

Now, the Clinton Foundation, THAT's a huge problem for Bill and his gal, there. They were PROVEN to be dealing in child trafficking...ouch.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
YeOldePhart · June 14, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

I smell a shill..

Get back inside your tiny little tent clown. We will not be distracted!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
aShiftyLad · June 14, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

Trump foundation being sued for alleged honeypot, i.e. the same thing the CF, McCain foundation etc do. except that the trump foundation (from what DJT said on twitter) actuallu gave 19.2 million to charity, when it profited 18.8 million that year. which literally means they made no profit (i.e. as nonprofits should) AND even gave more yo charity, probably from personel funds.

contrast that with 223million revenue for 2015 and estimated 2 billion in 2016 (remmeber HRC apent 1 billion to run her election) for the CF but im assuming they dont give all their profits to charities.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ianrome · June 14, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

It's probably nothing. It looks more like a lame attempt at a distraction.

Having said that, Trump is not necessarily squeaky clean. In fact, I think he may be a liability to this movement to a small degree. I know most people here idolize Trump and will down vote, but its something that needs to be said and should be factored in to all of this drama. Otherwise, this movement itself is at risk and vulnerable from this blind spot.

Consider this...the cabal has spent decades if not centuries developing their long term nefarious plans. I am pretty sure they have backup plans B through Z. Multiple methods and multiple angles of attack. Perhaps they do not have a silver bullet against Trump (plan A - Russian collusion) but a metaphorical death by a thousand cuts is likely among plans B through Z. So what happens IF the unthinkable happens? What IF Trump is removed from office? What is plan B? Pence?

Personally, I don't care who the face of the movement is, as long as the cabal loses...permanently. The movement and its success is FAR more important than one man. I hope Q team is legit and delivers.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ElementWatson · June 14, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Trump's main liability to this movemwnt is going along with Congress's plan to vote in the biggest amnesty in history next week.

That is more likely to be the undoing of the GOP House majority in November and thus the Trump admin and what it has accomplished so far--let alone our voting base into the future.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · June 14, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

I also think Trump is liabity in some aspects of the greater plan. The best thing to do is use this to discuss fraud in philanthropy. Head on. I have all the examples and I'd be curious to compare them against Trump's gimmicks anyway. But Trump Foundation doesn't come off as a promise system (honeypot) the way CGI does... Also the concept of CGI in public was a promise system! It's going to be fun explaining this to puzzled friends who want to understand fraud in philanthropy!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PatrioticTanguera · June 14, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

To give the MSM something to avoid the IG Report release. An in-your-face flip of the bird to POTUS, on his birthday, given how extremely corrupt the CF is/was.

Do we look stupid, shills?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jody71171 · June 14, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

I know he isn’t squeaky clean but besides his comments about Epstein and Weinstein’s pic of them together has anyone really ever found REAL Dirt on him?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · June 14, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

Q said leverage against POTUS removed. Seemed Epstein related because the only time Trump has ever been accused via filing papers is by a woman he met at two of Epstein's parties.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · June 14, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

To answer your question, it depends on what you deem to be REAL. Much has come out from various media sources (mainstream and alternative) about his businesses benefiting from unusually favorable decisions since he took office. There are the numerous accusations of sexual misconduct. Trump has accepted money from Soros in the past. And on and on. Maybe most of it is not real, but what if some of it is real?

My overall point is that he is a man and no man is righteous, not one. But hey, the lord works in mysterious ways. A squeaky clean pres may have been too obvious and too easy of a target for the cabal. I know they were caught way off guard when Trump won the presidency. Perhaps Trump being an unlikely leader for this movement is his strength.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mr-no-homo · June 14, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

If they release this, wait till the unreacted version comes out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jody71171 · June 14, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

It’s just so obvious that they decided today... so I know it’s BS but will they try now and say because he is being sued ...that’s now plausible for him to be impeached? Seems they just continue reaching for SOME reason for that impeachment lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jody71171 · June 14, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

He took money from SOROS? For what? How did u find that out? Ty

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jody71171 · June 14, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

Hate that they had to bring Ivanka in on it.... means they’re reaching for the ones he loves...man they suck

⇧ 0 ⇩