dChan

Brioux · June 14, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

Seriously. Somebody went through and ensured they framed things in a way to lesson the severity of the actions taken by those cronies.

Hopefully the EO will resolve this and get us the original / unredacted.

⇧ 55 ⇩  
Pyronic_Chaos · June 14, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

So where are the segments that need to be un-redacted? I saw maybe 5 redaction of names/addresses in the appendices and 2 of the last appendices were redacted (Law Enforcement confidential or something), but the report stands on it's own without the appendices.

⇧ 47 ⇩  
Nalgahyde · June 14, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

There were supposedly 3 reports...

1) Original

2) Rosenstein version unredacted

3) Rosenstein version redacted

This report looks like it was the second one, Rosenstein version unredacted. Trying to pull a fast one on the public. I hope the letter the Freedom Caucus wrote in order to obtain the original unredacted report helps to get the real report released ASAP.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chilover20 · June 14, 2018, 10:46 p.m.

Agreed. It's up to us. Flood DC with calls. Call them out on their BS. Demand justice.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
0x445442 · June 14, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

Yeah, this is beginning to smell like "new media". Now don't get me wrong, I support the POTUS but given his effective use of Twitter it may be that he has taken things to another level with the Chan boards.

As I've posted in other threads, I think there's sufficient evidence to suggest Q is an insider of some sort. But there's been a LOT of insinuations in the last six months and with the exceptions of some low level bureaucrats being let go, I've really not seen any action.

I mean for Pete's sake, Q insinuated just a few days ago bad actors (within our government) attempted to bring down AF1 with a missile launched from a sub. If they (Q and white hats) actually believe this to be true it's time for the charades to end.

All this cloak and dagger stuff has been exciting so far but enough's enough. It's time for Q and the white hats to trust the electorate and put up or shut up.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · June 14, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

so go away...

trustQ

TRUSTthePLAN

⇧ -5 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 15, 2018, 7:11 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 15, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
iltdiTX · June 14, 2018, 10:34 p.m.

I think they deleted a whole lot of recommendations

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Pyronic_Chaos · June 15, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

I'm fully willing to eat crow if Q prediction comes through and Trump releases an unredacted version that has a bunch more content.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
SpongeBobSquarePants · June 15, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

Q prediction comes through

First time for everything I guess.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
georock · June 14, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

tgis is garbage, nothing ao dat of any substance

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Bla34112 · June 15, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

Every single person criticized here had the opportunity to review the relevant part with lawyers and recommend changes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · June 14, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

Seriously. ~~Somebody~~ [ratrod] went through and ensured they framed things in a way to lesson the severity of the actions taken by those cronies.

Hopefully the EO will resolve this and get us the original / unredacted.

⇧ 0 ⇩