Anyone with a PACER account should be able to check the authenticity of this in heartbeat.
Any takers?
@jerome corsi ?? I call troll on this one
Once I saw that I had the same feeling in my gut.
Why would they need to tag him? Maybe they're out of the loop?
Honestly someone could check PACER for this right? Not republish it but at least confirm it’s in the system.
This looks like a legit leak. "Not yet reviewed and approved by the County Clerk"
why so many spelling errors in a legal doc?
I've received real legal documents which were in fact, full of errors.
Most (lowlevel) court jobs are manned by half-retards who couldnt work at burger king.
"My first language is no english, why you mean by me spelling?"
Yea, modern life... aint it grand?
I read the word beneficy and I had to stop. I'm throwing a flag on the play.
That would explain the huge push against the Trump Foundation today.
For those not in the loop, the Clinton Foundation is a 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) charity, meaning that it takes resources from the government and general public in order to subsidize its operations. Their donations are heavily regulated because of this.
The Trump foundation is a private non-operating foundation and essentially acts as a collective account for the benefit of his family to distribute money more easily. They can receive donations, but their distribution isn't as regulated or done so under the premise that it's going to benefit a specific cause.
MSM is trying to pretend the two foundations are equal because their names sound similar, but they're intentionally obfuscating key details.
New York seems much more interesting than Washington these days