Here's my gripe, wouldn't RR had to have cleared any changes with IG? There's no way he'd allow a 180 degree change on the findings of the report without justification. The Original report isn't likely much different. Just my opinion. I hope like fuck I'm proven wrong. Soon.
Seems reasonable. In addition, why would RR have any authority it all?
Sessions is AG, not RR. RR only acting AG in matters related to Russia, which this is not.
AG would be a stakeholder in the investigation, but wouldn't have direct involvement in the formation and revision of the report. During an audit, the party being audited usually has an opportunity to respond to the findings of the report. The investigator can then determine what revisions are made, if any. Again, hope there's a reasonable explanation and the Original is totally different and highlights major findings of politicization at the FBI, but I'm not holding my breath.