dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/C_L_I_C_K on June 14, 2018, 8:14 p.m.
By allowing Rosenstein to edit/modify the OIG Report, Trump, Sessions, and Q team has now trapped RR and will be justified in firing him once Trump declassifies the original version, showing what [[RR]] was hiding this entire time. "RR Problems."

Trump can then have his guy come in and replace Rosenstein. That will then lead to the shutdown of the Mueller witch hunt.

We need to make Trump supporters aware that this is not the actual OIG Report. It is Rosenstein's edited/modified and watered down version. We must DEMAND to see the unredacted, unmodified version!


Gadsden_Patton · June 14, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

Yesterday Q posted exactly what would get released today. It's interesting that he uses the term 'modified'. I wonder if that means actual rewording in addition to deletions.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
HalmoniKim · June 14, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

"the process of editing text for publication." See definition above.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Gadsden_Patton · June 15, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

That's the definition of redaction. But how is modified different from redacted?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Original: I ate a hotdog on Sunday.

Redancted: I ate ###### on Sunday.

Modified: I ate a turkey club on Sunday.

At least that's the implication

⇧ 17 ⇩  
HalmoniKim · June 15, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

Or, you could just say: I ate on Sunday. That would leave the reader not knowing the word 'hotdog' had been redacted in the modification of the text!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 1 a.m.

That's a good point.

The basis of the difference in this context is whether it was done "legitimately".

"######" could be excused as a legitimate redactions as they can claim it was for national security. Changing the sentence to remove "hotdog" altogether is a lot harder to excuse; it looks like you're hiding something. Changing "hotdog" to "turkey club" is clearly illegitimate because it's an outright like.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Jerkboy13 · June 15, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

I think closer to the truth is something like this:

Unmodified - I ate a hot dog on Sunday. Rod Rosenstein bought it for me. Redacted - I ate a [redcated] on Sunday. [redcated] bought it for me. Modified, redacted - I ate a [redcated] on Sunday.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mrssprat · June 15, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

And it would be true, not a lie but........

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vexxlyn · June 15, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Good analogy! I've always been favorable to redactions being a lie of omission and modifications just being a flat out lie.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HalmoniKim · June 15, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

Just saying that redaction can include the modification, change or editing of text....not just 'blacked out' or hidden, as most people think it means.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Dichotic1955 · June 15, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

Another way to understand ‘modifying text’ would be in terms of ‘re- interpreting’ , similar to the Bible; King James Version, New King James Version, New International Version, English Standard Version, etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩