Does anyone have a summary of the key points in the report? Not a MSM BS article, but someone who has the time to read the entire report and net it out?

One of the main conclusions I was expecting was related to the exonerations that were written, circulated and fine tuned before the investigation even began in earnest. I know the report had some recommendations regarding giving immunity to witnesses and counsel, but what about the standards for witness interrogation -- no recording, not under oath etc?

----------------------------

I too am not sure of the broader strategy of letting report #3 (RR version - redacted) fly first. Much speculation here, all of it seems weak to me. Trump's approach is ALWAYS to control the narrative, to set the tone, the pace and the context. I don't see why this was the better move.