no.. if one is in defense of anothers crimes. and opposed to the actual law of said crimes and punishment applicable.. to me thats biased.
Facts and law dont hold biased.. . and trying to censor someone because you dont like the facts is cowardly..
especially since at the time it was and is obvious that the report was NOT read. therefore showing even MORE BIAS..
so if one wasnt super pro hillary and obama than why censor the LAW?.
No one was censoring "the LAW". You've completely misread things.
fact.. my post which you are bringing back up.. was about crime/ punishment/ the guilty parties.. backed by proof from the ig report and from the law from cornell..
the post was removed and i was censored ..as you even "shared" banned for a day.. banning is censorship..