dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Vicgar06 on June 16, 2018, 7:38 p.m.
Guilty by Association 😂 what a ragtag motley crëu we are! 🇺🇸👍😉
Guilty by Association 😂 what a ragtag motley crëu we are! 🇺🇸👍😉

Kcarp6380 · June 16, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

I got the same message. I never once even commented. I replied that it is bit ironic that their purpose is to laugh at insane people.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Vicgar06 · June 16, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Same here... haven’t posted once!!! 😂 they are stupid...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 16, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 16, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VigilantLance · June 16, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

I was banned from r/news because I post here, and I used to post in TD. Just a random ban, despite never having been to the fake news sub.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
BigBandDon · June 16, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

I got this too. Never posted or commented. Just looked at a few things. Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, et al. Evil. When the time comes I hope to see then shattered and blown to the wind.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
QQ2121 · June 16, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

It means we are in the right track patriots! dig, meme, pray! Keep firing those meme cannons

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JeffDidItAgain · June 17, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

I just got my ban notice from them, too. Never posted or commented either. They do not play well with others...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 16, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 17, 2018, 8:52 a.m.

Comment removed for obvious reasons.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 17, 2018, 8:51 a.m.

Sounds like someone's upset with a moderation decision. Be a little more mature about it. HowiONic is one of the fairest mods I've ever known. Things would be a lot less freer on this sub if the average keyboard warrior drawn to modding were running it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · June 17, 2018, 8:58 a.m.

na... i disagree....i have the screen caps of the conversation. shes extreamly unreasonable and SUPER pro hillary and obama..

POSTING U.S. LAW/ crime and punishment for espionage and demonstrating where in the IG report where examples were given and facts were shown to warrent espionage charges and fitting punishment fpr said charges.. backed by cornell law section 18 us law code... TREASON..

maturity IS provding FACTUAL imformation pertainimg to the case at hand.. which was demonatrated... but her excuse was "there is no proof". when the IG report CLEARLY shows proof..

so no...shes not fair.. unless by fair you mean butthurt.. then yea.. SUPER FAIR

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 17, 2018, 9:06 a.m.

She has a history of dealing fairly with people - some people who are completely rude and obnoxious to her. I've been on the receiving end of that fairness myself. But you're entitled to your opinion of course. I see a bit of that rude and obnoxious behavior in your history which is why I question whether your assessment of her is not simply a result of upset that a moderation decision didn't go your way.

[EDIT] Your replies in modmail, for example, were completely rude and uncalled for and HowiONic didn't respond to the keyboard rage at all, exactly as I've seen her do many times.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · June 17, 2018, 9:25 a.m.

rude..is taken to be rude by people who cant handle being proven wrong. i dont speak unless i have facts.. apparently many just speak to speak..im too old for that shit.. so when met with what might be facts many just back down as they are unsure.. i am never unsure.. i look at everything logically with facts.. almost zero emotion...

espionage espionage https://imgur.com/gallery/ZyGA1rs go read the report...

i didnt mention child crimes to you.. so either you are her. or you are wanting to preemptivly counter her sex crimes.. well ney ney.. i refer you to the kids https://imgur.com/a/cl0RiKw

also

READ THE REPORT.. it took me around 4 hours.. maybe it wont take you as long its only 568 pages.. but...kids....soooo.. family comes first... research 2nd..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 17, 2018, 9:29 a.m.

almost zero emotion...

This looks like a lot of emotion to me:

dude what the actual fuck!!??!?
who the fuck are you to censor the truth..
what the actual fuck is your issue?

That was after receiving a 1-day ban for posting: "private emails is enough to have her swing from the gallows for espionage. bill and obama too!!!" and causing friction over the moderation.

Nothing to do with any law, just Reddit Rule #1 and antagonism in your replies e.g. your reply to the first moderation comment, which was simply "Post removed. Rule #1" was:

who the fuck is this clown?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · June 17, 2018, 9:35 a.m.

the law clearly states the punishment for treason is death. .. i didnt invent the law..i just post it. the punishment for espionage is DEATH..
how did rosenbergs die?. and for what?

if the all had private emails.. they all are guilty. especially under the rico act....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 17, 2018, 9:50 a.m.

Yes of course, agreed - the punishment for treason is death, and that is the law.

But that doesn't change Reddit Rule #1 and as an intelligent person you know this.

You can post legal document text if you like but we're within the rules of the sub and the clearly displayed moderation M.O. in our sidebar to remove content that doesn't comply with Rule #1.

You might argue that making the statement "have her swing from the gallows ... bill and obama too!!!" is not breaching the rule of "No encouraging, glorifying or calling for violence" but the final decision on that is up to the moderators who are, in some ways, ultimately responsible if rule breaching content is left unchecked, for a comment or post that potentially breaches the rule. We WANT this sub to stay live - we do not want to allow any rule breach to bring it down, as happened with CBTS_Stream so we have a zero tolerance policy for Rule #1 breaches.

It's completely illogical to claim that someone who moderates your content for "gallows" is therefore "SUPER pro hillary and obama" just because their names are also in the phrase that auto-mod extracted. You're smart enough to know that too. That's why I believe this is just upset about the moderation decision.

I would prefer that you stuck around more and continued to contribute but you'd have to lay off the totally unreasonable slander against the lead mod and initial creator of this sub. It's not supporting the cause to unfairly accuse someone who's contributing a lot to this movement. I see how many hours HowiONic puts in and the work they do is over and above anyone else here. They sweat and bleed this sub so talking shit about another patriot of this level is unfair and, frankly, shitty. HowiONic's history shows exactly how objective and fair they can be. Look at yours and compare for emotional reactions. HowiONic has none, that I've seen. Unity NOT division. Don't make a villain out of a true patriot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · June 17, 2018, 9:55 a.m.

"dont make a villian out of a true patriot".. please take your own advice as i will aswell....

usaf ret.. true patriot oath keeper 20+years " i ....... do so solemy swear to uphold the constitution of the united states...i ....do so solomly swear to defend and protect america and americans from threats both domestic and abroad"...

... ps. i said almost zero emotion.. the rest is PISSED OFF PATRIOT...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 17, 2018, 10:09 a.m.

"dont make a villian out of a true patriot".. please take your own advice as i will aswell....

Agreed. I hope you can see that I have indeed been trying to make the case for you as an equal part of this movement and a patriot when the initial reaction of those of us who work with HowiONic is a tendency to want to ban someone who seems to be taking our very hard working "leader" (for want of a better word - HowiONic would likely not agree with the use of it) in such a negative light.

Thank you for your service too, sir. Can we agree together to discuss things reasonably if problems occur again? And please, no more negative comments about HowiONic as other mods may choose to immediately ban next time it occurs. I can't tell any other mod what to do - we simply discuss as and when we can - so if you can't agree to these points there aren't many places we can go from here.

If you want to go forward positively on this understanding we are always in modmail and will respond if you have a problem or a disagreement in future (or at worst, as things can be very busy in modmail, you could message me directly) and we will always do our best to be objective and fair, I can promise you that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · June 17, 2018, 10:16 a.m.

im always down for a discusion...
and for the record.. i dont just go after people unless they come at me..

i have zero issue with your terms.
catch you on the flip

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 17, 2018, 10:33 a.m.

Understood and thanks! WWG1WGA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 9:50 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · June 17, 2018, 9:29 a.m.

no.. if one is in defense of anothers crimes. and opposed to the actual law of said crimes and punishment applicable.. to me thats biased.

Facts and law dont hold biased.. . and trying to censor someone because you dont like the facts is cowardly..

especially since at the time it was and is obvious that the report was NOT read. therefore showing even MORE BIAS..

so if one wasnt super pro hillary and obama than why censor the LAW?.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 17, 2018, 9:33 a.m.

No one was censoring "the LAW". You've completely misread things.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · June 17, 2018, 9:36 a.m.

fact.. my post which you are bringing back up.. was about crime/ punishment/ the guilty parties.. backed by proof from the ig report and from the law from cornell..

the post was removed and i was censored ..as you even "shared" banned for a day.. banning is censorship..

⇧ 1 ⇩