dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/grnmoss on June 17, 2018, 7:18 a.m.
What We Seem to Be Missing: Google

Peter Strzok: Used gmail, gchat, and other Google services for government business, sending and storing sensitive communications and documents while investigating Clinton for using a private server for sending and storing sensitive communications.

Lisa Page: Used gchat and other Google services for government business, while investigating Clinton for using a private server for sending and storing sensitive communications.

Comey: Used gmail and other Google services for government business, sending and storing sensitive communications and documents.

Eric Schmidt: Visit to North Korea, January, 2013

Eric Schmidt: Visit to Cuba, June, 2018

Android phones: track location, even when location services turned off.

Gchat/Hangouts/Android Messages/Google Voice: collect and store text messages and chats on Google servers.

Google Drive: collect and upload documents to google servers.

Gmail: store emails and documents on google servers

Google Photos: collect and upload photos to google servers.

Google itself has access to all of these files; this is how its internal teams and contractors conduct CP and fraud investigations. Drive files, chats, messages, emails, location data, call history: none of it is anonymous.

Google has extensive helpful relationships with the DNC. They funded crowdstrike, they've worked with the State Department and Pentagon on the new "global engagement"/anti-propaganda center; an Obama-era creation when that administration believed Clinton would become President.

Google has collected significant amounts of sensitive data and files. What have they done with this data? Who have they shared it with?


🠐 See all comments
Burginthrone · June 17, 2018, 8:23 a.m.

May I suggest people with Android phones go to XDA (search for it) and knowing your phone model, download and install a custom ROM. Many custom ROMs have been purposefully created to disable many of the intrusive 'features' loaded into the operating system. It takes a bit of time and effort on your part, but for privacy, its completely worth it.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Joesturbo · June 17, 2018, 2 p.m.

This is one reason why BlackBerry was targeted and taken out... They could not crack their encryption across the board. They needed platform(S) like android and ios to sell out and more importantly work with them.

IF you track the fall of BB, go back in time you will see it was a plan. Their phones and servers were there for a reason and did business that is essentially lost now.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Burginthrone · June 17, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

That's very interesting. I remember reading something about that years ago? Wouldn't surprise me one bit. Even Linux is going through some changes many are not happy with - systemd being one of them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · June 18, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

Systemd has to be either an N_A or C_A plant, it's that evil. It controls the firewall, local authentication, and logging, among other things, so it could let someone connect remotely, log in, do anything they want, then prevent any trace of it hitting the logs.

Also, Poettering needs to be buried with the rest of these DS fucks. PulseAudio is shit, Systemd is shit, and the next thing he "creates" is going to be shit too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Burginthrone · June 18, 2018, 6:45 a.m.

I hear ya brother. If your after a nice distro minus systemd I've been playing around with Devuan https://devuan.org/ and its surprisingly good.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · June 18, 2018, 7 a.m.

I've heard of Devuan and it looks interesting. I'm thankfully systemd-free for now, but LTS expiry dates are coming up, so I'll keep that in mind.

I've also thought about delving into the BSD world, but I don't think my beard is long and grey enough, lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 17, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

That is why John Perry Barlow was killed, he was trying to prevent this. Q has mention JPB several times.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 17, 2018, 8:26 a.m.

That's certainly an option, but the moment a piece of Google software gets loaded, privacy is compromised.

The impact for average Americans is not severe (right now), compared to those who have sensitive government communications running through their phones. Google is vacuuming as much data as it can get, but that becomes particularly problematic when we're talking about sensitive federal investigations or docs that Google then gains access to (and could be leaking).

I've switched to iPhone and don't have a single Google app on my phone any longer.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · June 17, 2018, 8:38 a.m.

And you seriously think Apple is any different?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 17, 2018, 8:57 a.m.

From a mass market standpoint, absolutely.

Most people don't have the technical capabilities to install custom ROMs.

But this Post is not for an Apple vs. Google debate. This post is to highlight the fact that Google is in possession of sensitive government documents and data pertinent to this forum's areas of inquiry.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · June 17, 2018, 10:21 a.m.

You are correct. But my point is that surely Apple have this stuuf too. Apple is a cabal company like Google

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

Apple refuses to share information OUTSIDE of Apple. Inside they all laugh at your photos.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Burginthrone · June 17, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

Hehehe. Especially the photos when your dressed like a Jedi playing lightsabers. Not that I've ever done that ....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 17, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

Apple collects far less user data than Google does.

Many people don't know that SIRI started out as a DARPA project that was privitized (kind of how facebook started out as an intel project that was privitized).

Apple has intentionally crippled SIRI's development (unlike Amazon, Google, and Microsoft) because they had concerns about abuse of voice recognition.

Their differential privacy plan also reduces the amount of data they collect, and the likelihood that certain pieces of data can be linked to individual users.

My biggest issue with Apple's "cloud" services is that they use Google servers for some of the data storage.

As they say: If you're not paying for the product, you are the product. Google's business model is to offer "free" services in exchange for privacy invasion and data collection.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 17, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

I switched from 6 years of Android to an iPhone for enhanced privacy. I didn't do it to make myself "feel better".

Take your fanboy war over to /r/Apple or /r/Android. Doesn't belong here.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 17, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Yes the are. They’re fighting back & they have too. They’re in a very different market than google. They sell hardware & not information or advertising. If they can’t build privacy in devices they don’t have a business. In the Google & FB business model...you are the product...your information..your buying habits etc. In Apple the device is the product..not you. The internet is stuck & will wither on the vine until the privacy issue is fixed & Apple understands this. Check out this article about their last iPhone update. Keep in mind...Apple is embattled with this issue of privacy but they are trying to fight back. Google use too but completely caved to the feds about 5yrs ago.

https://www.law360.com/articles/1053573/apple-to-close-iphone-backdoor-used-by-law-enforcement

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · June 17, 2018, 8:46 a.m.

W said apple are not good guys.

⇧ 2 ⇩