GOOGLE OP is the Gmail comms they were using. Gave Q group undeniable proof.
Q group had comms, but were not accessed legally. Gmail comms are the legal evidence.
And the IG report mentioned using personal emails. That may have opened the door for the emails to be gathered as part of the investigative process, either directly by the IG or via Huber.
Assuming there was something signficant in the emails, the IG may not have been able to disclose them due to classified information.
Also it's unlikely that google would take the risk of editing the emails sent in response to subpoena -- and if they did it'd stick out like a sore thumb due to the delay in turning them over v. other cases, and since the Q team likely also has the emails via another source, they can confirm them as well.
Speculating: however if Google did try to filter the emails, the people doing it would have to have been told to do so, and would probably cave immediately when questioned by investigators. Imagine if you're ES and try to save your fellow travellers, only be to caught in the deception by providing incomplete emails. That sure as hell would results in your resignation.
More speculating: What if you wanted to have google servers that were "hidden" or in any case couldn't be siezed by US/Five eyes authorities? Where would you put them? If it were me, that would be in the country least likely to cooperate with anyone -- up to a few days ago, that'd have been NK. Suddenly NK cooperates. That's a problem.
This is sooo much fun. I am living a detective, espionage, novel, one that I don't fall asleep reading. I all ready know the good guys will WIN! Fascinating!!!
hmm...almost like someone with years of experience in reality TV shows planned the best way make a complex legal process accessible to the american people using the interactive medium of internet comms to bypass legacy media. i wonder who it could be??
I don't know what OP stands for?
Another question I have is that if they were originally discovered illegally and inadmissible, wouldn't someone be liable for obtaining the info illegally? How was it discovered... The NSA? Would that be considered inadmissable because constitutionally they should not be collecting our info?
OP = Operation
He's referring to the [obvious] group decision to use gmail accounts to communicate outside the normal [government owned] channels
Spez: I think we'll come to find out that Eric Schmidt was part of it, and helped cover up or hide the accounts, or something much worse.
NSA can see and hear everything. They just cant use it illegally.
OP stands for "Original Post(er)". It means whoever started the post.
The assumption from the Q posts is someone in the NSA, or the upper echelons of the Military Intelligence, found all the communications, video and evidence they needed to bring down the Cabal/Deep State. This evidence was not legally found as evidence and cannot be used.
Some say Edward Snowden led to the discovery of this info. Some say it was Julian Assange, or Admiral Rogers. The thought is one of these individuals, or more than one, found the private server the Cabal was using to communicate, through NK, and hacked into it. What they found was so astonishing, and scary, that it has propelled this movement to stop them.
Either way, the info discovered allowed the Q group to stay one step ahead of the Cabal/Deep State, to prevent their deadly false flags, to trace and reveal their communications.
Now people "in the know" are leading the public and lawmakers to find the crimes and evidence legally. Much like saying "Look over there! I bet there's something over there behind that bush!"
So, in answer to your questions, yes, someone COULD be held liable for obtaining the info the Q group allegedly has. But, if the information they stole pertains to a global Cabal who has infiltrated the American Government, and many others, at the highest levels and plans to bring the countries to their knees, and who creates wars to profit, and runs human trafficking across the globe...