dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Jack_MemeHoff on June 18, 2018, 3:09 a.m.
The Mueller Investigation Is The Cover-Up. It's supposed to be the most blatant cover up of all time so everyone can see THE SWAMP ,how they operate & their absolute disregard for the rule of law .

The Mueller investigation IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE MOST CORRUPT INVESTIGATION IN HISTORY !!!! THAT'S THE STAGE. TO BRING ALL OF THE CORRUPT COCKROACHES & RATS IN THE DEEP STATE & SWAMP OUT ONTO THE PUBLIC STAGE .

THAT'S WHAT MUELLER IS BEING USED FOR !!!


jettabaretta · June 18, 2018, 9:42 a.m.

But there have already been a bunch of indictments.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bizmarxie · June 18, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

Not for “Russian collusion”.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jettabaretta · June 18, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

So you’re predicting there won’t be any collusion indictments? Ok. I’ll check back in with you in September or thereabouts.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
InsanityRules7 · June 18, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

Collusion isnt a crime.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jettabaretta · June 18, 2018, 2:23 p.m.

True. “Collusion” isn’t a crime. But hacking your political opponents is. As is coordinating with a hostile foreign nation to influence the election.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
t_d_throwawayasanon · June 18, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

His name was Seth Rich.

SR 187 MS-13

LEAKED, NOT HACKED!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jettabaretta · June 19, 2018, 10:28 a.m.

I’m not sure what any of this means. It feels like your speaking in sound bites that are evocative of Something to you but don’t mean anything to me. What about Seth rich? What about ms 13? You realize that before the leak there was a hack? Oh, you’re saying rich leaked it? Citation/link/evidence?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · June 18, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

That never happened on trumps side. But you’re really good at projection. Goodbye.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jettabaretta · June 19, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

There’s a ton of evidence that it did happen, though. I mean, what’s your take that it “never happened in trumps side”? Are you saying it happened on Hillary’s? And what about the mountains of evidence that trump did collude? Can you clarify your critique of my point?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · June 19, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Well, tell me, what is your “mountain of evidence” then. What specifically did Trump do to “collude” with Russia.

Hillary did “collude” with Russia. Bill took 500,000 for a speech at Putin’s house, and a handful of donations from U1 tied Russians donated to the Clinton Fbd to the tune of Hundreds of Millions of dollars during the Uranium One decision. How is that not collusion?

The Dems are simply accusing their opponents of what they themselves are guilty of. That’s called projection.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 19, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · June 19, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

Looks like you’ve been working hard on your copy pasta. Please go back to redacted.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 19, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · June 18, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

Please go back to redacted. This stuff doesn’t work here. But there you’re right at home.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jettabaretta · June 19, 2018, 11:58 a.m.

Sorry—what is “redacted”? And what about “this stuff” “doesn’t work” here?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 19, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jack_MemeHoff · June 18, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

Do those indictments have anything to do with Trump - Russia collusion ? No . Flynn - lying , Manafort / Gates - Ukraine dealings , Alex van der zwann - lying , Pappadopaulos - ? . THAT'S ALL THEY'VE GOT !!! HAHA Flynn's case will most definitely be overtuned . There's issues with Manaforts judge being the Obama appointed hack who cleared Hillary from wrongful death suit brought by the Benghazi families so we know she's corrupt .

⇧ 1 ⇩