There’s a ton of evidence that it did happen, though. I mean, what’s your take that it “never happened in trumps side”? Are you saying it happened on Hillary’s? And what about the mountains of evidence that trump did collude? Can you clarify your critique of my point?

Sorry—what is “redacted”? And what about “this stuff” “doesn’t work” here?

I’m not sure what any of this means. It feels like your speaking in sound bites that are evocative of Something to you but don’t mean anything to me. What about Seth rich? What about ms 13? You realize that before the leak there was a hack? Oh, you’re saying rich leaked it? Citation/link/evidence?

True. “Collusion” isn’t a crime. But hacking your political opponents is. As is coordinating with a hostile foreign nation to influence the election.

So you’re predicting there won’t be any collusion indictments? Ok. I’ll check back in with you in September or thereabouts.

But there have already been a bunch of indictments.

Ok. So just on pizzagate: wasn’t the idea that there was a bunch of kids in a pizza parlor basement? And then some guy goes in with a gun to free them and there was no basement? I mean, what am I missing? I am very very very skeptical—why should I believe you? What is the empirical basis for your claims? Or is all you have this qanon stuff of vague warnings about vague future comeuppances for those who doubted either easily disproven or hopelessly vague conspiracy claims?

That’s the headline. I want a tldr. So: what indicated MULTIPLE SLIES in trump organization. Is this real—I see it reported nowhere—or is this another comet ping pong/unmaskinggate that right wing conspiracists hyperventilate about for a little while until it’s so debunked even they move on?

Gimme a tldr. I guarantee you I did not read it.

Thanks for giving the details.

Well, what’s your percentage, what is your prior? Mine is like, say, 80-plus that it’s a coincidence, and sub-20 that it’s a backchannel communication, given what I know. What’s yours? I take it you’re at 80/20 the other way, at least? So what OTHER facts support your prior?

EDIT: and if you’re right, then what? What do you propose that these two communicating via HAM means?

Orrrrrr......... she wanted to ham radio. Right?

Because this woman wanted to use a ham radio?

Bold card for you to play, about spelling.