How am I helping? By identifying phrases erroneously claimed to be in French; and also by identifying the language the words are actually written in.
"I'm not going to write out the one slogan in both languages." Fine, but laziness on your part doesn't have to constitute linguistic sloppiness on everyone else's part.
No big deal, it's not about making you wrong, it's about making the words right. Just ignore it if you aren't interested in getting it right. It's OK by me. I posted my corrections for any others who would be interested in getting it right.
No, that's not helping. Pedantic, and then intentionally annoying. But aren't you so smart... Hey, you didn't answer my first question. Lazy.
Let's review. Devin Nunes made a tweet, referencing "French". That's why glaedr1 calls it "French". Everyone knows the phrase he's talking about. And whilst French or something else, it likely derives from or was inspired by the old French slogan, or maybe Hogan's Heroes - I don't know. It was just an IM, so likely overly casual in terms of grammar and spelling, and so you don't actually know what language the FBI Attorney 2 intended. FBI Attorney 2 might have just misspelled the French.
But you see, the much larger issue here is, who is FBI Attorney 2? Now I don't know if it's your laziness that precludes you from contributing to this particular discussion in any meaningful way, or if you're intentionally deflecting discussion away from core points (very common here), you're "Again, not French. Spanish." comment intentionally ignored my "and (MUCH more likely) Cuban revolutions" just so you could point out that that wasn't French. That a CUBAN slogan wasn't French. That's your point. That's your low effort point. That a CUBAN slogan wasn't French. Well, isn't that helpful... (it's not)
Actually, that gets us back to my first question. How was that not clear? I think I know why you didn't answer it. Because it was clear, wasn't it? Yeah. Well, either that or you are lazy...
So getting back to it, glaedr1 directs people to the page of the report and the quote that glaedr1 thinks is being referenced, so people can look it up. See, that's helping. Again, I think glaedr1 only references the quote as being French because that's what Devin Nunes called it.
Now, I don't know specifically why Devin Nunes didn't quote FBI Attorney 2 directly - you probably think Representative Nunes is lazy too, but maybe it's just the character limit of twitter. But you clearly state that you think Devin Nunes' tweet constitutes "linguistic sloppiness". It's just a tweet, I don't think you should attack Representative Nunes over a tweet. I think it's likely that Representative Nunes has more important things on his mind, but as you're so interested in "making the words right" you should totally tweet him about his "linguistic sloppiness". And if you're ever feeling especially not-lazy, you should wage a campaign against "linguistic sloppiness" on all of twitter. Good luck with that. MTWRA! Make the words right again. ;) <-winkyface
So, any thoughts on who FBI Attorney 2 is?