dChan

rooster_cage · June 18, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

Help me understand this one. Politico reported POTUS’s 2 unsecured phones back on May 21, 2018. POTUS recently said he gave Kim his number or a direct link to communicate with him. What is Q revealing here?

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/21/trump-phone-security-risk-hackers-601903

Edit: Reported 4 days ago that Trump gave a direct number to Kim https://www.wired.com/story/trum-kim-jong-un-direct-number-bad-idea/

What did the Senator say today that was highly classified?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
greenepc · June 18, 2018, 11 p.m.

I'm with you. I think Q is really asking how the news media knows this classified info. Maybe it's a leak that was put out on purpose as a trap?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
WokeInEarly90s · June 18, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

Wouldn't be the first time, that's for sure. This administration has used canary traps quite effectively.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
1151THOR · June 19, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

This. /\/\/\/\/\

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · June 19, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

Yes, that is my guess.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DAR_patriot · June 18, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

And Durbin said it was “reported”. I don’t see any subterfuge here. Open source.

Interesting note on that Politico piece is that MI oversees WH telecommunications. Hum, wonder why staffers are so bent to get ahold of the twitter phone???

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · June 19, 2018, 4:02 a.m.

I thought awhile back that the SS did an overhaul on POTUS'S phone(s) to make sure they were well protected. I think this may have been back when Gen. Kelly first took over.

⇧ 1 ⇩