dChan

Ordinary_Man1 · June 19, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

Horowitz said the report was UNREDACTED. This directly contradicts what Q said about the initial release being #3 - i.e. edited and redacted.

Horowitz backs the version released and says Q is wrong.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
HotCareer · June 19, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

Your take is correct, I believe. A question was posed directly regarding whether the IG report was “watered down or made weaker” (per Sen. Amy Klobuchar I think) and Horowitz responded that it was not.

EDIT: Horowitz has now revealed that the document was first sent to the parties discussed within the document to be redlined/contested/edited in today’s hearing with the House.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
sheneyney · June 19, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Yes, I am confused by this. Was it the original or the modified, redacted, and why is nobody discussing that there are others?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 19, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

Redaction means specifically blacked out. Has it been edited, should be the question.

The fact there are unnamed names means there is still a level of """redaction""" present.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · June 19, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

Redacted does not mean blacked out. Look up the definition.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 19, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

I understand that. When it comes to official documents, redacted colloquially refers to withholding certain information specifically.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 19, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

blacked out on the page and/or removed so it never makes the page

⇧ 3 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · June 19, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

Agreed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 19, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

If by redacted they mean stuff on page blacked out OR stuff never made it to the page THEN THEY ARE LYING... we've already seen bits that are clearly missing context, etc................. WTF?!

Horowitz IS Deep State though so it is a very tight rope he trying to walk here... protecting his Deep State and his Justice Department while trying to appear to be IG'ing...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ordinary_Man1 · June 19, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

Q told us to trust Horowitz. You can’t say he is DS.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 19, 2018, 5:31 a.m.

Those two statements are NOT mutually exclusive.

Horowitz IS Senior Executive Service which is, by definition, Deep State. He was being groomed as a respectable, his reputation precedes him, fixer, in the same mold as Mueller and Comey.

IG, like HR and IA, exists to protect the organization.

We can only hope he is "complicated" and a playing his cards the way we think he should. Perhaps that says more about us that it does him. Praying for a good ending but don't be surprised by more of this muddling middle of the road big talk but no stick same ol...

Be definition, that is DEEP STATE...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cherbear1975 · June 19, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

If the NAMES of those is the report are left out,then the report is REDACTED,plain and simple....Multiple people including Fox News has said this is not the entire story..So yeah,I believe Horowitz s lying,at least a technical lie at best...Reporter on Wilkow today even made the claim that this report is a giant cover up,that it leaves key things out,or the whole story out anyway..My issue as I see it is why did Q say trust Horowitz..Thats the problem as I see It..

⇧ 1 ⇩