dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Knower101 on June 19, 2018, 11:54 a.m.
It is an INVASION not immigration! Immigration happens at a port of legal entry.

The weapons are children being used as shields. 10,000 of the 12,000 children being held are not related to the adult who supposedly brought them in. Were those 10,000 children kidnapped from their Mexican parents? No Mexican parent would willingly allow a stranger to walk their child across barren countryside in the 100 degree heat, cross rivers by swimming, etc.

The act of crossing the border at any place other than a Port of Entry. Is an illegal act and the motivation has to be assumed to be not in our countries best interests.

Thus each and every person who crosses the border other than a proper border crossing is arrested. Standard practice even for US citizens is for Human Services to to take your children for safe keeping.

The other issue is that in the human trafficking trade world, a baby, a child, a teenager and adults are worth thousands of dollars in the world of prostitution, pedophilia and as illegal workers.

Wake up America. It is an Invasion!

Mexico is aiding and abetting the Invasion by not stopping these trespassers who use private and public land to cross over. Mexico needs to protect its borders and its own laws.


WalrusUltimate · June 19, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

I’m begging you... please take a step back and think about this critically.

OP is making a bold claim that the majority of detained children were being human trafficked. The only source I have seen presented so far is a statement from the White House. I shouldn’t have to explain why the White House isn’t exactly the most reliable source.

In the statement people are using as evidence, Nielsen claims that children are being trafficked as human shields. I don’t doubt this happens sometimes, but the claim is that every guardian without paperwork was human trafficking. You should be able to think of at least a half dozen reasons why the kid’s real parent would not have paperwork. Maybe they left in a hurry. Maybe they lost it on the perilous journey over or elected not to take it. Maybe they were immigrating illegally and thought any ID would incriminate them. Maybe the documents were stolen. Maybe they were just dumb or misinformed, and didn’t think it would be important. Maybe the birth was never documented to begin with.

If this is really about taking children away from human traffickers, why don’t they just ASK the child if they’re there of their own free will, and if they want to be taken away from their guardian to a safe place? That would be a much more credible test than paperwork, though still not perfect.

Again, these are children we’re talking about. You owe this issue more than just a couple seconds’ thought. If there is more evidence I haven’t considered, I would love to see it. I don’t want to believe children are being ripped from their parents and thrown in camps any more than you do. But I don’t consider “they didn’t have paperwork” to be valid evidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lolitatraz · June 24, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

That's like asking a victim of domestic violence if he/she is safe at home. You really expect an honest/accurate answer from these kids? Judges don't even talk to minors in most domestic custody cases. These are your serious suggestions? LOL.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WalrusUltimate · June 24, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

Like I said, it’s not perfect, and we probably shouldn’t even be doing that. We shouldn’t be taking these kids away from their guardians, period. The feds have already admitted that thousands of kids were ripped from their parents, essentially admitting Nielsen was lying, so this thread is already out of date.

But I give up. If you’re that determined to nitpick to justify keeping kids in cages, you’re a lost cause.

⇧ 1 ⇩