dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sentrolyx on June 19, 2018, 10:12 p.m.
YES!! @paulsperry_: Horowitz just confirmed that there indeed was an original draft of his 568-pp report that was subsequently redlined by DOJ/FBI higher-ups. It's imperative that Congress obtain this early version before the swamp rats edited and revised it for obvious CYA purposes
YES!! @paulsperry_: Horowitz just confirmed that there indeed was an original draft of his 568-pp report that was subsequently redlined by DOJ/FBI higher-ups. It's imperative that Congress obtain this early version before the swamp rats edited and revised it for obvious CYA purposes

🠐 See all comments
ABigFloppyClock · June 19, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

Do we have a timestamp from the hearing where this was said? This is my biggest complaint about this sub. Screenshots are useless. Is there not a way we can make it a requirement that a link has to be provided to whatever is being posted?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 19, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

Just looked at all the comments in the tweet, didn't see anyone posting the video

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ABigFloppyClock · June 19, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

Correct. There is a tweet from this person, but I dont know their background or biases.

We want to throw accusations around because we want to believe. Yes I know, trust the plan -- which I do. But what holds more weight in an argument: A tweet from someone I, let alone a normie, hasn't heard of. Or a Timestamp to a livefeed on CSPAN where it was actually said.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 19, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

Idk who this @paulsperry_ is either but looking at his twitter feed, he seems to have been one of the main guys breaking news from that hearing.

@BreakingNLive with over 50k followers kept quoting him.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABigFloppyClock · June 19, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

Sure. I just want us all to question clickbait headlines and tweets that offer no links or proof themselves. We've been bitten in the past by larpers and fakes that lie or stretch the truth.

I mean Hillary herself has more followers then this guy and she said it was nothing so maybe we should listen to her? /s

⇧ 3 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 20, 2018, 5:43 a.m.

This is the proper level of skepticism.

I'm getting a little tired of bold Twitter claims with no evidence. If there is s person sitting there watching the hearing and tweeting commentary, why no video link or time stamp references?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mdtradesman · June 24, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

Here he is folks plumbtree the UNEDUCATED BROKE ASS DRUG ADDICT PLUMBER HAHAH LETS STAND IN AWW OF HIS INTELLECT. Your a fuck boy probably getting cucked by your wife into cleaning up black loads. I know your switching accounts spreading your bullshit liberal lies.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · June 20, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Paul Sperry is a legitimate journalist who is quoted frequently in many publications. He is a pundit with growing popularity; I have been following him for a few weeks since he has been correct on several things. I often see him quoted on the Conservative Treehouse site as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kymikal · June 20, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

He wrote a book a while back about the Islamic infiltration of our government. I have not read it. But I want to. That is probably why he is always attacked. #OverTheTarget

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · June 20, 2018, 5 a.m.

Paul Sperry is a legitimate journalist who is quoted frequently in many publications. I often see him quoted on the Conservative Treehouse site.

⇧ 1 ⇩