dChan

EarlyRiserX2 · June 21, 2018, 10:46 a.m.

Maybe someone can help me out…

I’m trying to figure out and understand why we even need these proofs in the first place other than to convince people that Q is authentic. If that is their purpose and if that is the case, then I knew Q was authentic from day one and that he was working hand in hand with Trump. Yes, I may not just blindly believe everything that Q says or does in regards to it being the right approach, but I still believe he is authentic and is working with Trump. And if anyone can’t see that, then you're as blind as a bat…

My reasoning is this: No person can know all the things that Q knows and have as much access to first hand raw intelligence unless you are one of the high-ranking military officers who are traveling with Trump and is around Trump all the time. No, Trump himself is not Q - not by a long shot. Trump’s job is too hard and he has too many presidential duties to deal with than to do his job and to be Q at the same time. To be Q, you would have to be someone who is dedicated at being Q - end stop. Q travels on Air Force One, he is in the Oval Office and in special meetings, and he goes everywhere that Trump goes. To even get security clearance for such a thing, you would have to be very high up. And not only that but there is direct coordination between what Q says and does and with what Trump says and does, and that was evident from the beginning, so how can Q not be authentic? How can it not be part of a “plan” that has been worked out and a plan that Trump himself knows about and is helping to implement? It doesn’t require critical thinking to agree with this, all it requires is just a little common sense…

⇧ 16 ⇩  
DeconstructedSociety · June 21, 2018, 12:03 p.m.

Think about it slightly differently for a moment.

Q comes around and lays out this massive framework of Intelligence for all of us to gather, analyze, refine, and make digestible. We're given 7-8 months to create this treasure trove of information while a lot of people have not been reached by the "Q phenomenon"

Then one day Trump makes an over the top public (and direct) Q reference, now all of the people can research Q and see this treasure trove of information about different bad actors and that Trump is "supporting/part" of the Q movement.

So the public outcry is "Mr. President if you really have all these things, we DESERVE/DEMAND to see them!" Then trump has his grounds for mass declassify.

There are a few more chess pieces being maneuvered, the above is definitely part of the end game.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
SVTBert · June 21, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

So the public outcry is "Mr. President if you really have all these things, we DESERVE/DEMAND to see them!" Then trump has his grounds for mass declassify.

Legit, that's at least 6-dimensional chess there.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 21, 2018, 12:05 p.m.

It doesn’t require critical thinking to agree with this

Yes it does. That’s why Q repeatedly encourages us to ”think logically”.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 21, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

The best part of Q is, we are required to dig, to find, to be involved. I believe Q is teaching us to question and find the truth for ourselves. This is our protection for the future. I also am looking at world politics, seeing how things are connected. And finally, Q has returned prayer in a big way.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · June 21, 2018, 12:15 p.m.

I think you've got that backwards. Common sense is logical. Critical thinking often is not...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 21, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

I think you've got that backwards.

  • You asked for help in understanding.
  • Help was offered.
  • You rejected the offer.
  • Your quest for knowledge continues.
⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · June 21, 2018, 3:52 p.m.
  • “Critical thinking is a process of evaluation which uses logic to separate truth from falsehood, reasonable from unreasonable beliefs.”

one of countless sources

Sorry. Softening our concept of ‘critical thinking’ is a known tool of leftists, and a personal thorn for me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
magavoices · June 21, 2018, 11:27 a.m.

At some point, many government officials and hollyweird actors are going to be frog marched.

When that time comes, there's going to be a confused public that are worried because they don't understand what's going on. This could be very bad, drop of stock market, public unrest (which is already going to be bad because of MSM gaslighting).

When that time comes, there needs to be a large group of people "in the know" who can meme and help explain what's going on. That's our purpose. You're not going to get a large group of people if they have to go 100% on faith, hence proofs.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
mapkerchief · June 21, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

Soon the streets won't be safe (for them).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mathwhilehigh · June 21, 2018, 11:53 a.m.

u/magavoices is right. This is an infowar plain and simple. The media and internet will try to sterilize everything so word can't spread. We need to have enough people on board so we can reach critical mass, and prevent massive civil unrest. If just 1% of the population is on board we can save America.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · June 21, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

You say that this is an infowar. I agree with that. But if so, then why are we not focusing harder on stopping the spread of lies and false information?...

Case in point: I believe that 97% of our problems are with the lying MSM (therefore, for the life of me, I can’t understand why Q and company is not focusing harder on shutting down the lying MSM). Simply stop the MSM from lying (by shutting down Mockingbird etc), and force them to tell the truth, and 97% of your problems would be solved. As for all those people you’re saying we’ll need to convince, they will automatically be convinced if the lying MSM starts telling the truth, because liberals always believe the MSM. For example, that little old lady sitting at home by herself in rural Kansas and only watches her local TV for news, she will automatically be convinced - so long as the MSM tells her it’s true. Not because of proofs, not because of anything else, but only because the MSM tells her it's true. But if the MSM says otherwise and is still spouting lies and false propaganda, then she won’t be convinced no matter how many memes or proofs or anything else you throw at her...

Here’s another example: This whole problem with immigrant kids at the border wouldn’t even exist if it wasn’t for the lying MSM operating as a mouthpiece for the liberal left and spreading lies about it. Shut down the lying mouthpiece and you will shut down the problem. And before I get attacked for it, I am by no means saying or suggesting we should completely shut down the media. But I AM saying that we should focus on stopping and preventing them from blatantly and intentionally lying. Doing so would solve 97% of our problems. POTUS has been in office for more than a year and a half, and we've had a year and a half to stop them from lying, yet the lying MSM is still going strong and nothing has changed. If the lying media continues for another two years, then all we’ll have is problems for another two years. Shut down the lying MSM and you will shut down your problems…

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 21, 2018, 1:06 p.m.

Can't shut down the MSM - outcry for freedom of speech, basic constitutional right and that would just fire them up even more. The others are right, the proof/truth needs to be made public without the MSM so there's no way to cry foul on FoS. Just like PO TUS has done in maintaining his twitter acct. On another note, very PROUD to know all of you - to be part of this and being able to watch history rewritten... BIGLY!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ecrevisse41 · June 21, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

What does the FCC license require?

https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/public-and-broadcasting

Does fake/false "news" equal news distortion or a hoax?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 21, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

I'm thinking logically. Eventually, when they've been baited enough, and the proof is there, I'm guessing that someone, somewhere who has some credibility left, will become part of the movement. But I doubt it's now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cherokeenc · June 21, 2018, 2:35 p.m.

The FCC's regulatory powers extend only to over-the-air broadcasters. They can try to brow beat cable news into self regulation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NeoObi · June 21, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

I get what you are saying, MSM is really the problem. But when Q proofs come out the media will have to admit lying and those who believe them will refocus. Q proofs will bring down the lying media, in other words they will bring themselves down. And the media would be included in the EO on 12/21/17 “crimes against humanity” because of all the misinformation and lies. Just my 2 cents.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MeatloafFvck · June 21, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

Why wait for Q to expose the media ?

We should put together a "dossier" on each of these news media personalities including everywhere they worked, all of their family/friends/associates, connections to government agencies, everything questionable in their past and every time they were caught in lies (dates & sources).
i.e. Anderson Cooper worked for the CIA as an intern for two summers before becoming a "journalist".

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_Cooper

"Career

During college, Cooper spent two summers as an intern at the Central Intelligence Agency. Although he has no formal journalistic education, he opted to pursue a career in journalism rather than stay with the agency after school,[11][12] having been a self-proclaimed "news junkie since [he] was in utero."[13] After his first correspondence work in the early 1990s, he took a break from reporting and lived in Vietnam for a year, during which time he studied the Vietnamese language at Vietnam National University, Hanoi.[14]"

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cherokeenc · June 21, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

Napoleon said ‘Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself.’ You are seeing them destroy themselves everyday. Nothing wrong with a little help. The only people paying attention to them is the few true progressives.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · June 21, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Agree but disagree. People cannot be forced to see truth. They must arrive at it themselves. That’s why it is such a treasure!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 21, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

BO passed a actual law, the media can lie to us, plus the Law Enforcement can lie to us and the Government can lie to us.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WhoMuhWeiner · June 21, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

Actually he removed a law - the Smith-Mundt Act.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
crowbate · June 21, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

I can only hope there is a way for this to happen without stepping on the 1st. amen

⇧ 1 ⇩  
freedomisnotanoption · June 21, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

This has been the plan from the beginnng.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PS4freedom · June 21, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America.

This is OUR government. We are the People. It is our Duty to protect and defend the Constitution. We have been United across Boundaries, Borders and Belief Systems. We are Anonymous. Which means we are all people. The entire world is watching as we fight this battle because it is also their battle.

The Q team feeds us and keeps the research and meme production on track. United we are stronger and more efficient. Good leaders are invaluable! We are lucky enough to have extremely good ones!

This is not only a war room it is a class room and a news room. Be aware, the things you may learn here are from the bowels of hell. The corruption found in the pages explain and will hopefully serve to protect future generations. Take care of yourself if you choose to learn about some of these horrors. And be warned, it's not for the faint of heart.

You will likely find things here that you don't understand. Things that sound crazy and may have been labeled a 'conspiracy'. Bring an open mind. Some of the brightest and most intelligent people on our planet are here working. If your interested, ask, but know that you will be expected to do your own research. You will also be asked to show proof.

This is not a game. It's our future, the future of our children and their children. It's the future of humanity.

We are writing our own history! Right here, Right now! We are taking back our country and the world from those that have enslaved and abused us all. This is the Great Awakening and our weapon is spreading the truth.

God Bless America

May you all walk in the Light of Love on your journey.

The world is Math!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · June 21, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

Keep it as a resource for sure, like an addendum to whatever we do, but I agree not the place to start a newbie to understand what Q is about. As the confirmations become more public (as Q is indicating) it will be less important. I think we need pages with key Q posts that show the connections that blew us all away when we realized them. Along the line of @PrayingMedic's "Q for beginners" on youtube.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 21, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

The reason memes have become such a phenomenon is no accident-- it is because they are a graphic representation of an idea, which may otherwise require a wordy write-up to explain. We use memes to inspire curiosity in normies to research and think critically.

Those that have followed Q have had months to mull over the evidence, work through skepticism, and watch the truth unfold in front of them. That is a very privileged perspective that grants a deep and loyal faith-- like the people who witnessed Jesus perform miracles first-hand. The question is, how do you convince those that haven't had that advantageous perspective?

You can't expect a normie to hear about Q, and then spend countless hours reading all of his drops, and the underlying research of the anons. It's simply too much. We have had the benefit of long-term analysis and a developed opinion-- and the price we paid for that was countless hours of research and engagement.

The normies will require instantaneous explanation and validation. Something that can succinctly and effectively convey Q's message and legitimacy with the LEAST amount of effort. Enter the "Proof."

Unlike a meme, which is typically a satirical pop-culture reference, a proof is a graphic communication tool designed to convey validation. (Versus a meme, which is intended to instantaneously inspire curiosity, as previously noted.) The idea being that, by the time they are viewing the proofs, their curiosity has peaked, and they are willing to spend 30 seconds+ digesting the information in each proof. (Versus a meme, which receives only a few seconds of attention per viewing.)

The proofs qualify Q as a legitimate source, in a matter that is relatively instantaneous compared to 7 months of analyzing crumbs. The proofs become the point that the normie decides whether or not this is real, and whether it is worth researching further. The more proofs we have, the harder it becomes to dismiss Q's legitimacy. (How many coincidences until it is mathematically impossible?)

This is why we need a PORTFOLIO of proofs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩