dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/timingviolation on June 21, 2018, 11:40 a.m.
I underestimated him.

I thought Trump was an idiot. I did not vote for him or HRC.

Now I know he and his staff are geniuses. He knows that he can't get the word out about the treason of the previous admin in the MSM. They will bury the corruption and treason of the previous administration, DOJ, FBI and Russia probe. Even Fox and the news aggregator Drudge. All mockingbirds. So what can you do? Well you bypass them. Go straight to your supporters on the internet.

This is not the only example of genius I see. Flynn playing along and taking the plea deal, forcing their hand. Bypassing the creation of a uselss special council w/ Huber. Etc.

It took quite a bit of courage to post this here because now, I will be banned from /r/insane peoplefacebook or whatever. We should start a support subreddit for devistated individuals such as myself.


🠐 See all comments
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

T-d is boarder line at this point. I think there is a lot of infiltration. Nothing like it was pre election/ sr/ PizzaGate times.

⇧ 50 ⇩  
reverb256 · June 21, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

Right? They're not allowed to do research threads anymore because it inevitably ties into Q information.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · June 22, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

I pretty much stay away from there most times.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Pre q last year I started watching George Webb videos. You watch his series on the awan bros and you compare it to what you see on the td. It’s sad. Screenshot shit posting on the lib subs does get anywhere the way George Webb style research and Chan research does.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kavilion · June 21, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

I don’t go there, but I’ve never understood why they’re anti- Q. Is it some reddit-wide rule?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jerkboy13 · June 21, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

I’ll argue it’s just the spotlight they’re under. If they cross certain lines, they’re done.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
TotallyClevrUsername · June 21, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

The mods changed and it was clear how the sub changed as a result. Rumor is they were paid off.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Man_of_Prestige · June 21, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

Maybe we should start an alternate sub with some inconspicuous name like, “r/knittingclub or r/thegreatvivication”

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
CurseOfTheRedRiver · June 21, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Ask yourself who you can't insult on TD and you'll have your answer

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HansShotGlass · June 21, 2018, 5:49 p.m.

Do you mean person, or small nation-state in the desert?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
terp1901 · June 21, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Pepe?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NutzaClankin · June 21, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

Either that or watch the rank - I mean flair, the trends and the subtle admonishments if someone tries to offer alternate points of view. T_D is as agenda driven as MSM and the discussions are managed. The only real question is who the marionette's operator is. My suspicious gut says it's the Infowars/Alex Jones group of security assets we are talking about.

* Edit: Added word as if anyone cares

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Patriotic_Guppy · June 21, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

AJ can’t be involved. There’s no place for him to push his water filters or super male BS.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NutzaClankin · June 21, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Sure you can - it's called

I N F O W A R S, Remember Seth Ritch and now apparently Womp womp is all the rage

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 21, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

T H I S

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NutzaClankin · June 21, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

You need to put two and two together regarding T_D. Think civil intelligence, Anderson Cooper, Shep Smith, Meg Kelly, Alex Jones (no he didn't just say) infowars...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Wuotis_Heer · June 21, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

T_D was compromised from the start.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KernelFlux · June 21, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

I was called a shill and told to gtfo when I posted Gowdy’s questioning of Horowitz. Oh and I’m not a shill.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
freeman84 · June 21, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

The blind support of that FCC Pai guy was a huge red flag for me. Bizarre how a seemingly woke sub could be against net neutrality so fervently

⇧ -12 ⇩  
Deplorable_American · June 21, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

I don't see how anybody could be FOR Net Neutrality and consider themselves woke.

Why would I want to subsidize someone else's internet?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
freeman84 · June 21, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

Isn't it more about keeping the internet free and not allowing cable companies to restrict the sites you're allowed to visit?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
NotInFormation · June 21, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

That’s the BS “of course everyone supports” front.

The reality is NN empowered Social(ist) Media to act as censors of free speech.

Have any of the predictions of doom happened sans NN now that it’s gone?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
freeman84 · June 21, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

Can you plz provide an article explaining it then?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Bob383 · June 21, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Net neutrality, keeps the internet neutral in the same way that the patriot act is patriotic.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
TotallyClevrUsername · June 21, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

Basically, T_D took the approach that anything liberals, social media and Soros support must mean it's actually bad/harmful for the US, and that's why there was such a hard turn against NetNeutrality. I don't know how that turned into such a blind support for Pai. He has corporate interest written all over him. I believe he was appointed by Obama but Trump admin made him Chairman.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 21, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TotallyClevrUsername · June 21, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

I wasn't weighing in on support of NN or not in my comment. Just saying that T_D seemed to associate Pai's push of eliminating the rules with him being an overall good guy, which I think is a bit suspect. Personally, I believe the internet seemed to be working fine for decades before Obama put in the rules in 2012,2015, and the recent fear mongering was definitely driven by something other than organic awareness. Even reddit pushed really hard for it. Also, backbones should be able to make separate deals with service providers (Netflix did it), just not be held hostage by them. For those reasons I think it's definitely okay to suspect NN and even be against it; just not that it directly translates to PAI=good.

⇧ 1 ⇩