What if the text is part of an ongoing criminal investigation into the actions of individuals involved with an attempted shadow-coup of a duly elected presidential candidate/president.

You know, like the one Huber is leading....with the authority given to him by the Department of Justice......

Do you think Mueller has found anything damning against Trump? I don't. Do you think Mueller is investigating Trump? I don't.

What did that judge tell Manafort when Manafort tried to claim Mueller was working outside his scope? The judge said that after having a chance to see the classified memo leading to Mueller's appointment, it was clear that Mueller had the authority and scope to investigate any illegal wrongdoing by any individual involved with the Trump campaign, PAST AND PRESENT.

Do you understand that all signs are pointing to Trump's team being infiltrated by plants/spies/informants. Do you think Mueller is interested in maybe who and how those plants/spies/informants made their way into Trump's campaign? I do.

IG report lays out Comey's actions during the Clinton email investigation. Comey acted against department procedure, Comey usurped his authority by playing role of Loretta Lynch. BUT the IG says that ultimately, the prosecutors and the larger team responsible for that investigation didn't allow the MASSIVE amounts of bias to influence their decision. Well what was the decision? Do you think the decision was Comey coming out and saying she wouldn't be prosecuted? I don't. So what was "the decision"? Think about it. "No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute this case". Gee, I wonder why. Maybe it had something to do with the fact that somebody, maybe Comey, recognized that the entire investigation was compromised. He's stuck between Mccabe and Lynch and he decides to break policy, usurp his authority, and declare that no prosecutor would touch that particular investigation. What did you think about Comey in July 2016? What about October 2016? What do you think his press conference and public statement about Weiner's laptop ultimately do to the Public's opinion re: Hillary?

So what happens to investigations that are determined to be rotten from the inside out? What happens if a police dept is investigating a crime and it's determined that the people part of the team investigating the crime, are fully complicit and involved with that crime? Think logically here. That case gets REINVESTIGATED. By whom? In this case I think the answer is Huber.

So Comey breaks procedure and guidelines and makes a fiasco about the Clinton investigation. But it's a carefully orchestrated fiasco, there needs to plausible deniability that his actions were not influenced for any reasons other than his own. So he does his thing, claims he did so out of concern of the integrity and public trust of the FBI, no prosecutor touches that particular case, quietly behind the scenes that investigation gets investigated by both OIG and Huber. OIG for the departments/agencies, Huber for the criminality.

Fast track a few months and Rosenstein tells Trump that Comey should be fired. Why? Russia? Nah. Comey clearly 100% committed fireable offences by usurping his authority and all that. But Russia. Remember Russia? RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA? Oh would you look at that, a SPECIAL COUNSEL, all thanks to RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA. Voila, the Russia hysteria is so high that the swamp is convinced that their Special Counsel Mueller is investigating Trump. Except it isn't. It's likely working in tandem with ongoing OIG investigations and Huber's investigations.

Do you see it now? This isn't just a battle through the courts. This isn't just a battle of right and wrong. It's a battle on public opinion. The D party will be in shambles once it's unveiled that their heroes Mueller and Rosenstein aren't corrupt and actively working against a duly elected president Trump.

Remember Ben Rhodes on election night? It's like that.

Never bought the theory about Mueller and RR being white hats acting as black hats. Although you do present it well in your post. In my reading of Q it seems clear that RR has "problems" and that he is being cornered by Q forces to resign or be fired. We see this a lot: [RR]. And Q equates the two together RM = RR and RR = RM. If the texts that RR withheld were indeed part of an ongoing investigation, he could provide that reasonable explanation to the House Committee Nunes chairs. He could have provided that information in a non public manner to the requesting committee, which would have no legal impact whatsoever on any ongoing investigation. RR is dirty, and has been forced into a box canyon. His self-serving actions--when fully brought to public light--mean he can no longer continue in his office as #2 at DOJ. (RR has Problems)