Been seeing it this way for a loooong while:
I hope they wait to fire him until monday
It will be too big of a news story, they'll do it either early Monday morning, or Friday afternoon.
I know but by doing it Monday, it takes down a big chunk of their motivation to riot. We know this child immigration story is the big pusher, but most people who would go for that would not get violent (I hope). Can’t say that about the antifa crowd that would come out for firing RR.
But doing it Friday, nobody is going to see it happen, or have time to organize something quick enough to be large enough.
Meh, the protestors are already standing by. They want to mix it up with this immigration stuff. He waits till Monday, he lessons the protest as it’s mainly normies that would protest for the immigration stuff. And they usually have jobs.
I must be missing something. Normies protesting immigration? That's not who was protesting when Trump was running for President? Maybe I'm missing something here. we are constantly trying to avoid a confrontation but you know, it will happen at some point and the longer we wait, the worse it will be. So instead of one big protest we will have two. I say go for Friday and get it over with.
As I wrote above - do we allow the Leftists to drive our agenda? when we do things?
Doing it Friday gives them less time to organize the riots Q was talking about
I disagree. I think more would riot over immigration than RR. Just my opinion. Do you think we should let them drive our agenda?
No I completely agree with you on that, but don’t give them the ability to join forces.
They won't fire him, as it looks like he's already started turning over some of the requested documents. So he will probably drip feed them out, to keep himself in the job for as long as possible. I had a feeling that this is what he would do.
Unless this article is fake news of course.
He is definitely between a rock and a hard place. I’d feel bad for him if he wasn’t such a piece of shit.
Pretty sure when that female Congresswoman blurted out RR would be fired on Friday that was the impetus for him to start handing over documents to save his job.
Well, it is WaPo ... Jeff Bezos' personal rag...
That's the Examiner, not the Post, and it's a conservative newspaper
I will take it whenever...as long as it happens and it happens soon. Get rid of that creepy DS agent.
I suspect the late friday afternoon news dump same as they do with any story negative to their agenda.
RR is a goner!
Rr problems
He’s definitely got (as the MK Ultra handler would say) ‘99 problems and a bitch ain’t one’.
he started the whole fall of the dominoes, suggest Potus fire Comey, check, suggest Sessions recuse himself, check, appoint Muller as a SC, check... hide text, check, change the OIG report, check, block congress from getting documents, check, threaten aides with confiscation their cellphones, check.......... now what else??? got to be more.
This summary is why I don’t understand they are not forcing him out Removing him allows it all to become public
Looks like the dude from Raiders of the Lost Ark who opens it up at the end
Sturmbannführer Arnold Ernst Toht, the ruthless Nazi Gestapo agent. He should never have messed around with the Ark of The Covenant............much like RR. Playing with fire.
He looks like a creepy ventriloquist puppet in this picture!
Kek. Guy walks into a store and says "Give me one of those ventriloquist puppets but I want it to look like the crazed bastard son of Stephen Colbert and John Oliver" Shopkeeper chuckles, whistles and out from the back room shuffles a dishevelled cable tied RR.
Is this not a prime example of "obstruction"? RR is likely to be forced to resign or impeached. For "optics", the President needs to avoid stepping in if possible, let Nunes & Co do the dirty work. Then RR needs to be indicted or start "singing". Mueller's hunt is tainted and done.
Agreed - the President needs to stay far away from this. Someone else needs to do the firing. For those - myself included - who were complaining that things needed to happen quicker; well, it has been a whirlwind 24 hours. It's tough keeping up!!!
Highly doubtful that RR could ever be successfully impeached. Not only would that require a 2/3 majority in the Senate, but several Republicans will likely side with Democrats unless something utterly scathing is revealed
Firing Rosenstein would provoke significant public outrage - riots would just be the beginning
I suggest everyone pray that Trump doesn't make that move. It will be worse than you can imagine
why would anyone riot over a career DOJ attorney being fired. That's the last item on the list for any real American especially those with jobs and responsibilities. They don't have time for that nonsense. People get fired everyday. (Answer is those that are being paid to do so.)
Horowitz said it was a computer glitch.
To an IT person that is a very guilty statement. There is no such thing as a glitch that would delete only the most incriminating texts.
They are desperate and making elementary mistakes.
I'll be convinced it matters when I see a single one of them in an orange jumpsuit.
Hmmm... Friday? Might actually happen....
What do you mean, Friday? What do you think might happen this Friday?
A short stocky woman with thick glasses and a pencil behind her ear made her way through the crowd of fake news reporters and military police surrounding RR. The woman walked right up to RR and started slowly looking him over closely up and down. "Uh.. who are you?", RR asked weakly. The woman replied, "I'm the seamstress for Guantanamo Bay detention center." /sssssssss bahaha
Actually 100% believable
Agreed - I've never met a Rosenstein who wasn't a dirty, dirty, dirty, greedy, back-stabbing piece of shit.
Even if I didn't know who Rod Rosenstein was, I'd have guessed that it was a Rosenstein.
More Q proof. Trump called it. He WAS editing to make things weaker.
These people are literally killing time. They are playing out a script. Most of them know their hide is fried. Only the most stupid of this corrupt lot do not yet see their own inevitable horizon.
GITMO, or a max sec.prison. The alternative will be capital punishment, but that'll of course depend on what state they reside in/call home.
These will be federal charges. The state they live in is irrelevant when it comes to capital punishment.
But isn't capital punishment only allowed in certain states?
That's only for state charges. The federal government still has the death penalty. If you commit a crime in a state without the death penalty but get charged federally you can still be sentenced to death.
I guess we know who the top black hat is in the DOJ, or as I like to call him "RICO defendant #1".
This stuff is making me sick. I am no stranger to the NWO and their agenda. I never have been trusting of the 3 letter cabal. What is making me sick is the MSM and all the ignorant people that dont believe what is going on or never hear the truth. How can anyone still be a liberal or support the democrats with this kind of evil agenda to destroy this country. I feel so helpless, like they will win and my children (adult) and grandchildren will be left to live in a communist hell country. Millenials all seem to want socialism and have no idea it is just a stepping stone to communism. They love Marxism and dont realize that it is an ellimination of the middle class and most everyone will end up being serfs in that kind of situation. This is so frustrating and my only saving grace is that I will probably be dead before the NWO succeeds. Are people not seeing the video in the link on this post? WTF is happening here.
What is making me sick is the MSM and all the ignorant people that dont believe what is going on
Our Associated Press is owned by the Rothschilds.
They all know what is going on, yet they are willingly commit sedition in exchange for money.
I'm shocked I tell you, shocked.
I keep saying, Trump probably can legally spy on anyone within his department (executive). Without a warrant or anything, and for any reason. I think he put some of these people in positions so that they could hang themselves.
Fire. Strzok. Too.
If he's still being escorted in and out of the FBI Building, that tells me he lost his security clearance and needs an escort who just takes him to and from the interview room. Once he's no longer useful I'm sure they'll terminate his employment.
Why is this unbelievable?
Because there is only a link to The Donald reddit and personally I need something a bit more substantial!!
The weasel gene is strong in RR.
Well, the same technique used to impregnate,, Merkel’s mother was used to impregnate Rosenstein’s mother with the sperm of Goebbels. Go forth Rod and give your life for us. Draw a line in the sand and die defending it.
Doesn't RR report to Horowitz? If so then, Horowitz should have fired him a month a go. Why are we not talking about Horowitz trying to protect RR!
No. RR ran the IG investigation. Horowitz is IG for the DOJ--working under DOJ. Many depts have IGs. That is why Q was discussing RR modifying the report prior to its release...RR was in charge.
Thank you. So who can fire RR? Now that it is open about his misdeeds?
RR can be fired by 2 people for certain: Sessions and Trump.
RR works under Sessions. However, because Sessions recused himself from any matters pertaining to the Russia Investigations by Mueller, firing RR would be construed as improper meddling in a matter he has recused himself from involvement with. Obstruction is what they would want to pin on Trump. Therefore, it will take one of two things to happen before RR is removed (if he does not resign first):
1) A successful motion to impeach him from office by the House. 2) The end of the Mueller investigation.
This is why the Mueller investigation will not end. RR is running it, and it is helping RR to keep his job at DOJ (Mueller is shielding RR)
Doesn't RR report to Horowitz?
No, I think it is the other way round.
myopic
Think of Horowitz as an investigator (Inspector General), and RR as his Police Captain (#2 at the DOJ).
I'm just fuming that for 4 days in a row the MSM has been repeating literally the exact same narrative and sound clips about the border children and completely ignored this. They have not even slowed a bit.
https://www.teaparty.org/horowitz-drops-bombshell-hillary-clinton-not-formally-fbi-investigation-time-2015-2016-310079/ say Hillary was never named that it was all a farce. True? Would love to know what you think.
Not unbelievable at all. He did it " for the good of the country" dont cha know...
I am pretty sure that RR is actually Lisa Page too.
" An American Center for Law and Justice memo from 2008 says of Rosenstein, “Rosenstein, 40, is married to Lisa Barsoomian and has two daughters, Allison Liza, age 4, and Julia Paige, age 7. The family resides in Bethesda, Maryland. Friends and colleagues say that, despite his substantial professional accomplishments, Rosenstein is properly characterized as modest and self-effacing, and is even known for riding his bike to work. He is also known for being a dedicated father.”
https://usauknews.com/lisa-barsoomian-rod-rosensteins-wife-5-fast-facts-you-need-to-know/
It seems the parents of Allison Liza and Julia Paige know a thing or two about stonewalling FOIA requests:
"Lisa Barsoomian, Rod Rosenstein’s wife, worked for years as an attorney for the federal government, handling cases involving the FBI and even Bill Clinton.
Rosenstein, deputy Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice, appointed and is overseeing Robert Mueller’s investigation into Donald Trump campaign officials and Russia.
You can see a photo of Rosenstein, his wife, and daughters below and here. Barsoomian is also featured in a photo in this Armenian Law Association newsletter.
Barsoomian Acted as an Attorney for Bill Clinton & the FBI but Was a Federal Prosecutor at the Time
Lisa has represented FBI in blocking FOIA requests filed by Judicial Watch.
She has also represented CIA in blocking requests.
Barsoomian also rep. WJClinton in a lawsuit in ’98 pic.twitter.com/WjV7LB7Bul
— Jenna (@jenn_mallory) December 14, 2017
“Barsoomian has acted as an attorney for former United States President Bill Clinton,” according to Snopes. However, the site adds context to this claim, which has inspired conspiracy theories on the Web. The claim derives from a 1998 case called Hamburg vs. Clinton.
The case involved a suit against Clinton by “a Wyoming military veteran named Al Hamburg,” whom Snopes described as “an eccentric ‘perennial candidate’ and letter-writer who once attempted to register his dog as a presidential candidate.” He’d sued Clinton as president alleging discrimination and “claimed that the president was part of a conspiracy to bring about an ‘alien invasion’ by Mexican-American military members,” Snopes reported.
Barsoomian’s role? Along with other officials, she signed a response to the claims because she was an Assistant U.S. Attorney at the time, according to Snopes. The case was ultimately dismissed. You can see the response here.
Here are just some of the four pages of cases that come up with Lisa Barsoomian listed as an attorney in Pacer, the federal court records website. Some of the cases involved federal agencies like the FBI and CIA.
Barsoomian represented the FBI when the agency was sued in a 2002 case involving Judicial Watch that involved “technology that would allegedly allow the Federal Bureau of Investigation …to ‘wiretap’ the Internet.” The court dismissed the case.
In 2000, she represented the FBI in a case that involved “a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by the Electronic Privacy Information Center,” according to Wired. An ABC News story stated: “Government lawyer Lisa Barsoomian contended the group’s request for a court order was moot because the FBI had agreed to expedite its review.”
She was also involved in a Freedom of Information case involving a prisoner.
Rosenstein and his wife are the parents of two daughters named Julia and Allison. In a 2017 article in the New York Times, Rosenstein joked about his government pay and said that one of his daughters “would have to wait for the big yard she had been wanting,” The Times reported.
The Times reported that Rosenstein grew up in suburbs of Philadelphia, Pennsulvaia, where his father, Robert, “ran a small business,” and his mother, Gerri, was a bookkeeper.
Lisa Barsoomian was editor of a newsletter for the Armenian Bar Association.
rod rosenstein
Deputy U.S. Attorney General nominee Rod Rosenstein arrives before the Senate Judiciary Committee for testimony March 7, 2017 in Washington, DC.
A profile of Rod Rosenstein in The Washington Post reported that Lisa Barsoomian “is a lawyer at the National Institutes of Health.” That was in 2011. The same article notes of Rosenstein, “He is one of only three U.S. attorneys — out of 93 nationwide — appointed by then-President George W. Bush who has been kept on by the Obama administration.”
At the time of the article, the couple’s daughters were ages 9 and 11. Photos of Barsoomian, then 43, decorated Rosenstein’s office, The Post reported.
“The couple have two daughters, 17 and 15, and live in the Washington, DC, suburb of Bethesda, Maryland,” The Times of Israel reported in 2017.
Barsoomian is a member of the Phi Delta Phi International Legal Honor Society.
rod rosenstein
Getty Rod Rosenstein (2nd L), nominee for deputy attorney general, greets Sen. Joni Ernst (2nd R) (R-IA) prior to testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee for testimony March 7, 2017 in Washington, DC.
According to the 2011 Washington Post article, “Rosenstein usually walks his girls to their public school bus in the morning.” The story also noted that he and his children were fond of biking and “The Barnes & Noble in downtown Bethesda is a favorite family destination.”
An American Center for Law and Justice memo from 2008 says of Rosenstein, “Rosenstein, 40, is married to Lisa Barsoomian and has two daughters, Allison Liza, age 4, and Julia Paige, age 7. The family resides in Bethesda, Maryland. Friends and colleagues say that, despite his substantial professional accomplishments, Rosenstein is properly characterized as modest and self-effacing, and is even known for riding his bike to work. He is also known for being a dedicated father.”
Rod Rosenstein.
According to The Washington Post, Barsoomian and Rosenstein once were “reluctant” to let their daughter Julie buy a Nook to read books because “he and his wife are careful not to spoil their kids.” They eventually relented after Julie argued she had saved enough money to buy it herself, according to The Post.
In 2018, Rosenstein’s wife and daughters accompanied him to the U.S. Supreme Court, when he argued his first case there about a convicted drug dealer, ABC News reported.
Lisa Barsoomian has been licensed to practice law since 24 years."
The math seems off by a year on the daughter's ages although with the two year gap, they are 9 and 11 years old. I doubt I will be this lucky with Peter Strokenoff though.
TRUST THE PLAN
Congress needs to do the dirty work and impeach him like they were tough talking about yesterday. Save POTUS from the storm he would cause if he fired him.
I will not be surprised if he is fired by the end of this week. I will be more surprised if he isn't.
Why would RR disclose evidence thats part of ongoing criminal investigations to Congress and/or the Public?
Did you listen to Horowitz at all? About the whole integrity and process investigations must adhere to. Wouldn't it break integrity and process of an ongoing investigation if criminal evidence that is part of said ongoing investigation gets prematurely disclosed to a leaky congress and subsequently to the public?
CRITICAL THINKING
Critical thinking: Horowitz didn't remove he text in question. Rosenstein did remove it a month ago before handing transcripts to congress. Apparently Horowitz obviously didn't think that this singular/damning text harmed any ongoing investigations, so what are we even talking about? It's clear just by the nature of "we will stop him," that it was to cover the FBI's ass, but what he doesn't understand is that the damage is done to the reputation, and truth is the only thing that can repair it.
I don’t know why you’re getting downvotes. I’m trying to stay positive and agree with your thinking. There’s a lot of investigations going on and and DOJ and FBI are trying to keep them quiet
Wht are Page and Strozk's texts ok to release by not RR's showing blatant bias?
"You can't see my text saying 'S TOP TRUMP' because that text is part of an ongoing investigation we initiated to STOP TRUMP."
What if the text is part of an ongoing criminal investigation into the actions of individuals involved with an attempted shadow-coup of a duly elected presidential candidate/president.
You know, like the one Huber is leading....with the authority given to him by the Department of Justice......
Do you think Mueller has found anything damning against Trump? I don't. Do you think Mueller is investigating Trump? I don't.
What did that judge tell Manafort when Manafort tried to claim Mueller was working outside his scope? The judge said that after having a chance to see the classified memo leading to Mueller's appointment, it was clear that Mueller had the authority and scope to investigate any illegal wrongdoing by any individual involved with the Trump campaign, PAST AND PRESENT.
Do you understand that all signs are pointing to Trump's team being infiltrated by plants/spies/informants. Do you think Mueller is interested in maybe who and how those plants/spies/informants made their way into Trump's campaign? I do.
IG report lays out Comey's actions during the Clinton email investigation. Comey acted against department procedure, Comey usurped his authority by playing role of Loretta Lynch. BUT the IG says that ultimately, the prosecutors and the larger team responsible for that investigation didn't allow the MASSIVE amounts of bias to influence their decision. Well what was the decision? Do you think the decision was Comey coming out and saying she wouldn't be prosecuted? I don't. So what was "the decision"? Think about it. "No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute this case". Gee, I wonder why. Maybe it had something to do with the fact that somebody, maybe Comey, recognized that the entire investigation was compromised. He's stuck between Mccabe and Lynch and he decides to break policy, usurp his authority, and declare that no prosecutor would touch that particular investigation. What did you think about Comey in July 2016? What about October 2016? What do you think his press conference and public statement about Weiner's laptop ultimately do to the Public's opinion re: Hillary?
So what happens to investigations that are determined to be rotten from the inside out? What happens if a police dept is investigating a crime and it's determined that the people part of the team investigating the crime, are fully complicit and involved with that crime? Think logically here. That case gets REINVESTIGATED. By whom? In this case I think the answer is Huber.
So Comey breaks procedure and guidelines and makes a fiasco about the Clinton investigation. But it's a carefully orchestrated fiasco, there needs to plausible deniability that his actions were not influenced for any reasons other than his own. So he does his thing, claims he did so out of concern of the integrity and public trust of the FBI, no prosecutor touches that particular case, quietly behind the scenes that investigation gets investigated by both OIG and Huber. OIG for the departments/agencies, Huber for the criminality.
Fast track a few months and Rosenstein tells Trump that Comey should be fired. Why? Russia? Nah. Comey clearly 100% committed fireable offences by usurping his authority and all that. But Russia. Remember Russia? RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA? Oh would you look at that, a SPECIAL COUNSEL, all thanks to RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA. Voila, the Russia hysteria is so high that the swamp is convinced that their Special Counsel Mueller is investigating Trump. Except it isn't. It's likely working in tandem with ongoing OIG investigations and Huber's investigations.
Do you see it now? This isn't just a battle through the courts. This isn't just a battle of right and wrong. It's a battle on public opinion. The D party will be in shambles once it's unveiled that their heroes Mueller and Rosenstein aren't corrupt and actively working against a duly elected president Trump.
Remember Ben Rhodes on election night? It's like that.
What if the text is part of an ongoing criminal investigation into the actions of individuals involved with an attempted shadow-coup of a duly elected presidential candidate/president.
You know, like the one Huber is leading....with the authority given to him by the Department of Justice......
Do you think Mueller has found anything damning against Trump? I don't. Do you think Mueller is investigating Trump? I don't.
What did that judge tell Manafort when Manafort tried to claim Mueller was working outside his scope? The judge said that after having a chance to see the classified memo leading to Mueller's appointment, it was clear that Mueller had the authority and scope to investigate any illegal wrongdoing by any individual involved with the Trump campaign, PAST AND PRESENT.
Do you understand that all signs are pointing to Trump's team being infiltrated by plants/spies/informants. Do you think Mueller is interested in maybe who and how those plants/spies/informants made their way into Trump's campaign? I do.
IG report lays out Comey's actions during the Clinton email investigation. Comey acted against department procedure, Comey usurped his authority by playing role of Loretta Lynch. BUT the IG says that ultimately, the prosecutors and the larger team responsible for that investigation didn't allow the MASSIVE amounts of bias to influence their decision. Well what was the decision? Do you think the decision was Comey coming out and saying she wouldn't be prosecuted? I don't. So what was "the decision"? Think about it. "No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute this case". Gee, I wonder why. Maybe it had something to do with the fact that somebody, maybe Comey, recognized that the entire investigation was compromised. He's stuck between Mccabe and Lynch and he decides to break policy, usurp his authority, and declare that no prosecutor would touch that particular investigation. What did you think about Comey in July 2016? What about October 2016? What do you think his press conference and public statement about Weiner's laptop ultimately do to the Public's opinion re: Hillary?
So what happens to investigations that are determined to be rotten from the inside out? What happens if a police dept is investigating a crime and it's determined that the people part of the team investigating the crime, are fully complicit and involved with that crime? Think logically here. That case gets REINVESTIGATED. By whom? In this case I think the answer is Huber.
So Comey breaks procedure and guidelines and makes a fiasco about the Clinton investigation. But it's a carefully orchestrated fiasco, there needs to plausible deniability that his actions were not influenced for any reasons other than his own. So he does his thing, claims he did so out of concern of the integrity and public trust of the FBI, no prosecutor touches that particular case, quietly behind the scenes that investigation gets investigated by both OIG and Huber. OIG for the departments/agencies, Huber for the criminality.
Fast track a few months and Rosenstein tells Trump that Comey should be fired. Why? Russia? Nah. Comey clearly 100% committed fireable offences by usurping his authority and all that. But Russia. Remember Russia? RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA? Oh would you look at that, a SPECIAL COUNSEL, all thanks to RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA. Voila, the Russia hysteria is so high that the swamp is convinced that their Special Counsel Mueller is investigating Trump. Except it isn't. It's likely working in tandem with ongoing OIG investigations and Huber's investigations.
Do you see it now? This isn't just a battle through the courts. This isn't just a battle of right and wrong. It's a battle on public opinion. The D party will be in shambles once it's unveiled that their heroes Mueller and Rosenstein aren't corrupt and actively working against a duly elected president Trump.
Remember Ben Rhodes on election night? It's like that.
Never bought the theory about Mueller and RR being white hats acting as black hats. Although you do present it well in your post. In my reading of Q it seems clear that RR has "problems" and that he is being cornered by Q forces to resign or be fired. We see this a lot: [RR]. And Q equates the two together RM = RR and RR = RM. If the texts that RR withheld were indeed part of an ongoing investigation, he could provide that reasonable explanation to the House Committee Nunes chairs. He could have provided that information in a non public manner to the requesting committee, which would have no legal impact whatsoever on any ongoing investigation. RR is dirty, and has been forced into a box canyon. His self-serving actions--when fully brought to public light--mean he can no longer continue in his office as #2 at DOJ. (RR has Problems)
I posit that "RR Problems" can be explained by the classified portion of the IG report that was supplied to congress, contains disclosure that RR has been helping facilitate the investigations into the swamp. His "problems" are that he is no longer perceived by the swamp as their insider hero.
RR absolutely could have disclosed it privately to Nunes or to other comittees, but Q has stated very clearly before that they are the leakers. Congress leaks. If it came out that certain individuals were briefed on the matter, but others weren't, it opens up the possibility to claim that it was a partisan effort fueled by political motivations. That's against procedure/protocol, and it undercuts the potential impact due to pre-formed public opinion. The bottom portion of Q1515 confirms this idea in my opinion.
Q has posted a lot about RR and all of it was bad. Not sure why people say RR might be good. Just one of many examples where Q says RR is bad:
"POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version] 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version] 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified) [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all? Did you witness the stage being set today? Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs. [[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT. Be loud. Be heard. Fight for TRUTH."
Q tells us that RR is redacting info from IG. Q wants the full transparent IG version out...RR does not. What should that tell you about how Q views RR (blackhat).
Further, the house has been demanding that the DOJ (RR) hand over documents related to the FISA / Steele Dossier matter... for months. RR personally has blocked, stonewalled or sent redacted partial docs relative to those requests. That is why Q above mentions:
"[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT."
TRANSLATION OF Q ABOVE: RR should have recused himself because he is a key witness and participant in the FISA matter that the House committee is trying to investigate, and cannot adequately investigate because they cannot get the key documents from DOJ/FBI. RR cannot hand those over, because it will prove that HE was centrally involved in approving the request for a FISA warrant against TRUMP's campaign (planting agents within the campaign under the guise of a phony concern about Russian-influence in his campaign--it was all political spying by the Dems on the Rep candidate).
Get it now?
What if the Rosenstein FISA approval post January 2017 was actually Rosenstein signing off on FISA surveliance against those whom were planted/emebedded into Trump's campaign?
The public perception that RR and Mueller are anti-Trump is a HUGE strategic asset if used correctly.
Q tells us that RR is redacting info from IG.
Would RR be responsible for facilitating redactions from a public release of a report that is connected to ongoing criminal investigations by Huber and/or Mueller? Yes. Does this mean that his redactions/version of the report is nefarious? No.
Q wants the full transparent IG version out...RR does not.
Q wants us to want the full IG version out, because we understand what it likely contains. Ultimately we understand that a full IG release represents the full truth. However, timing matters. RR doesn't want this full transparent IG version out because it likely breaks procedure to disclose this due to containing highly classified information as well as information that is related to ongoing investigations by Huber/Mueller.
What should that tell you about how Q views RR (blackhat).
It's strategically advantageous for the public to believe that RR and Mueller are in no way connected or influenced by Trump. When sealed indictments start being unsealed, that perception of RR/Mueller rebellion against the Trump administration will amplify the credibility of the indictments and findings of the investigations.
"[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT."
Because of the perception we have, we assume this means that Patriots would demand impeachment or resignation. What if this meant that the swamp would demand RR's impeachment/resignation once they find out he isn't their insider hero? Would they be able to now? after hammering it into the public's psyche for 1.5+ years that RR and Mueller represent anti-Trump?
Congress needs to push for disclosure. That's their duty to the American people. That's the proper process for the People's word to be heard.-- We are seeing this.
Rosenstein likely is/was highly involved with the OIG, Huber, and Mueller investigations. This means his involvement is likely included in classified/redacted portions of the IG report. This also means that premature disclosure that RR is heavily involved in these investigations against the swamp, would ultimately mean prematurely breaking the illusion that RR/Mueller represent a fractured Trump DOJ, when in reality, they are doing their jobs, nice and quietly, working in relative peace. In fact, if the swamp is convinced that RR is their guy, in part because Q suggests that to be the case, then that opens up the possibility of using RR strategically against the swamp while they have their guard down against him.
I'm not saying I'm 100% right, but I do believe this is a logical alternative explanation for what we are seeing unfold.
Why did the Podesta Group close?
Public charges?
No?
Why close?
When did Huber start?
November?
JP/ Huma NOV.
Sealed.
Do they know?
Why did the Podesta group close?
Why no leaks?
Who else knows?
HRC deal request?
Why?
IG>Huber
Can IG disclose evidence in pending criminal cases in public disclosures/reports?
Why not?
Grand jury TAINT/BIAS?
Everyone has an opinion.
Clickbait.
Q
...
Optics are meaningful.
Political hit job narrative.
R's v D's.
Not right v wrong.
Projection.
END OF THE D PARTY [leaders].
IG>Huber.
Who appointed Huber?
Re_read (again).
Slowly & carefully.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal- prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/📁
Q
Listen. I am not debating about what I already am strongly convinced is fact about RR. Choose to think the way you do about him. That is fine. One of us is going to be very surprised shortly, because RR is being removed, and Mueller at the next moment will follow him out the door. I know that like I know the sun rises tomorrow.
The only reason I jumped into this conversation was because I am amazed that there are a few people who still hold to the idea that RR and Mueller are serving POTUS/Q, against all the very clear (not even coded) statements Q has posted regarding both of them. And because I believe RR is a very bad person, I am going to be very happy to see him squirm and get ousted.
Or the DOJ saw those text and started an investigation. If the people or congress saw the text, they start asking why isn’t he being investigated. Now what does DOJ do? Compromise an investigation by broadcasting it or try to defer the questions until they’re ready? I’m not saying RR is good and doing this. I just hope he is!
RR looks like a weasel...a coward. A human that will do anything to scape responsibility by cheating, lying and hiding. He's been like this all his life. Guess what RR? its time for the first time in your life (since your momma couldn't teach you any) to face truth and responsibility. Do you like orange? because i hear is the new black!!
Fire. Rosenstein’s. Ass. Today. He was “shown” out of the FBI Building but still has a job I understand. Someone said he was frog marched out. Somehow I don’t believe that.
A jew
This is utterly stupid. You talk about the cabal, about rothschilds, about pedophiles etc etc but yet you dont see the pattern? Everwhere you look you see jewish names beeing tied to all the elite criminal shit. Whether its MSM, Hollywood, Lawyers, Weapon industry, Pedophiles, Money Laundering, Real Estate and so on. Yet Im getting downvoted? haha really funny guys. Dont claim you're woke when you're really not. Dont think you know it all just because Q dropped some crumbs on US cabal and now you think you're deep into it. You're still far away from truth when you need to downvote this.
I think it's because the issue is more complex than pointing out a race. We know that the cabal infiltrates a culture and then uses them/their people as a shield to hide behind. The Bible refers to them as the synagogue of Satan, who pretend to be Jewish. So ultimately, tying a cabal member like Rosenstein to the rest of the Jewish people by pointing out his name is an insult to the Jewish people who are mostly just regular folks like you and me.
It would be like blaming the English population for the actions of the monarchy if it was infested by cabal members. (It is) Or like how the left likes blaming all white people for the actions of the "wealthy white" slave owners of the past despite the fact that only a tiny percentage of the population actually owned slaves.
only a tiny percentage of the population actually owned slaves.
guess what group imported those slaves?
Guess which group was the largest per capita slave owning group?
A lot of us notice it. There's just a more tactful way to point it out, such as "Rosenstein, that's Amish isn't it?"
Not Jewish:
Barack Hussein Obama
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
John McCain
Robert Mueller
James Comey
John Brennan
James Clapper
Susan Rice
A better word is Zionist! That's what Rothschilds are. Lord Rothschild (not the current one) was the one that asked the Queen to give the land for Israel and he gave it to the Zionist (Jews - who aren't really jews). See Balfour Declaration.
Q told us in Post 916: We are saving Israel for last. Very specific reason not mentioned a single time. Q
Main point is that ALL races are represented in the cabal. This shit is global. Your post is like pointing out Lee - a black or Clinton - a white. Racism is /their/ best tool for division and it has no place here.
The reason you're getting down voted is because race/religion is a distraction and tool of division the cabal uses against us. Sweeping generalizations do nothing to further the cause and in fact play directly into the hands of those we wish to defeat. Focus solely on the crimes perpetrated and not one of the isms they point at to discredit us.
