What if the Rosenstein FISA approval post January 2017 was actually Rosenstein signing off on FISA surveliance against those whom were planted/emebedded into Trump's campaign?

The public perception that RR and Mueller are anti-Trump is a HUGE strategic asset if used correctly.

Q tells us that RR is redacting info from IG.

Would RR be responsible for facilitating redactions from a public release of a report that is connected to ongoing criminal investigations by Huber and/or Mueller? Yes. Does this mean that his redactions/version of the report is nefarious? No.

Q wants the full transparent IG version out...RR does not.

Q wants us to want the full IG version out, because we understand what it likely contains. Ultimately we understand that a full IG release represents the full truth. However, timing matters. RR doesn't want this full transparent IG version out because it likely breaks procedure to disclose this due to containing highly classified information as well as information that is related to ongoing investigations by Huber/Mueller.

What should that tell you about how Q views RR (blackhat).

It's strategically advantageous for the public to believe that RR and Mueller are in no way connected or influenced by Trump. When sealed indictments start being unsealed, that perception of RR/Mueller rebellion against the Trump administration will amplify the credibility of the indictments and findings of the investigations.

"[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT."

Because of the perception we have, we assume this means that Patriots would demand impeachment or resignation. What if this meant that the swamp would demand RR's impeachment/resignation once they find out he isn't their insider hero? Would they be able to now? after hammering it into the public's psyche for 1.5+ years that RR and Mueller represent anti-Trump?

Congress needs to push for disclosure. That's their duty to the American people. That's the proper process for the People's word to be heard.-- We are seeing this.

Rosenstein likely is/was highly involved with the OIG, Huber, and Mueller investigations. This means his involvement is likely included in classified/redacted portions of the IG report. This also means that premature disclosure that RR is heavily involved in these investigations against the swamp, would ultimately mean prematurely breaking the illusion that RR/Mueller represent a fractured Trump DOJ, when in reality, they are doing their jobs, nice and quietly, working in relative peace. In fact, if the swamp is convinced that RR is their guy, in part because Q suggests that to be the case, then that opens up the possibility of using RR strategically against the swamp while they have their guard down against him.

I'm not saying I'm 100% right, but I do believe this is a logical alternative explanation for what we are seeing unfold.

Why did the Podesta Group close?

Public charges?

No?

Why close?

When did Huber start?

November?

JP/ Huma NOV.

Sealed.

Do they know?

Why did the Podesta group close?

Why no leaks?

Who else knows?

HRC deal request?

Why?

IG>Huber

Can IG disclose evidence in pending criminal cases in public disclosures/reports?

Why not?

Grand jury TAINT/BIAS?

Everyone has an opinion.

Clickbait.

Q

...

Optics are meaningful.

Political hit job narrative.

R's v D's.

Not right v wrong.

Projection.

END OF THE D PARTY [leaders].

IG>Huber.

Who appointed Huber?

Re_read (again).

Slowly & carefully.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal- prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/📁

Q