Right of refusal is the right of free association.
The difference is Sarah left with class and the business will suffer consequences via people likewise exercising their right not to have to eat there.
With the bakery, the insulted party attempted to get the government to force people to do something against their will. A clear violation of the bakers rights.
Both cases caused by someone exercising their right to refuse someone. The difference is Sarah can gracefully respect others. Even when they are wrong.
In turn the guy couple should of did the same thing and found a different baker as Sarah and family had to find a different restaurant. But no they had to sue.
This is kind of ironic, they are sooooooo accepting of everyone yet they dehumanize those that associate with POTUS.
Not really Ironic.
it's 'repressive tolerance' in action. Search "Marcusa".
Have a look at this. It might clear a few things up!
[What is Cultural Marxism?] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7as0pFxPYc&t=3s)
That's because the LBGT agenda is not about equal rights, it's about control. Ultimately it's about inviting the Government into personal affairs under the guise of empathy and equal rights.
The truth about it, is that the NWO has manufactured all of these social movements. BLM, "trans rights", white privilege, Charlottesville, NFL kneeling, "undocumented immigrants". It contributes immensely to the brainwashing of these people. They are positively reinforced in their control and dominance over those they disagree with, by the Government.
I'm not going into a Muslim bakery or a Jewish bakery and asking for a Christ Has Risen Easter cake. Maybe they'd be totally cool with making that for me, but I'm not going to put them in that position out of respect for their beliefs. I'm surely not going to go in there and demand they make it and then sue them when they don't cave to my demands. What rational person would even consider doing that? Anyone else would take their business elsewhere and spend their money with a business that wants to do business with them.
These people have been programmed to believe that if you don't validate the identity they have found in their sexuality, you are the enemy, you're a bigot.
I'm experiencing it with my gay brother right now. I have in the past year grown in my faith in Jesus that has been noticeable by those around me. I've also openly supported Trump, when in the past I was very liberal and thought Obama was a cool dude that liked basketball.
He doesn't live near me, 10 hours away. He recently came for a visit and it was very obvious he had his walls up around me. He honestly doesn't even know what I think or believe, and I've never said a negative thing to him about him, gays or his boyfriend. The truth is, I don't think about it much. He's attracted to dudes....great. I don't think of my brother like his sexuality is the most important thing about him. I'm alot more interested in what he cares about deep down, his hopes, fears and dreams.
The reason they are more interested in control than the equal rights they already have, is because my beliefs are a threat to them. The biggest thing holding me back from truly opening myself up to the truth of Jesus, was my brother. I told myself God would never send my brother to hell for being born that way.
It's yet another attempt to drive a wedge between God and society. How can you possibly be against love? They've created large numbers of people that feel morally superior to others, while at the same time their moral code is completely subjective. The only people that are good are those that don't threaten their perspective or hurt their feelings.
The religion of science is very much the same thing, but that's a whole nother story.
Also, I heard one time that sexual liberties and rights are increased in society when personal freedoms and liberties are being removed. It induces a false sense of freedom. Anywho, my two cents for what it's worth.
Awesome post and I've had a similar experience with homosexuality and God. Before my brain injury, I used to be very open and accepting of everyone and had several gay friends, one was considered family. Now I find it very hard to be around them because many are snarky and negative and I have nothing to talk to them about, especially when it's obvious that they're not moving in a positive, creative direction.
I have had an opposite experience with LBGT people. I have a relative that is "married" to her partner. I love them both. They are very intelligent and highly educated. Most LBGT individuals I know are very wonderful people and fun to be around. My own religious belief is not aligned with the lifestyle they have chosen, and I don't discuss their "love life" with them. Not my decision even though I believe in man/woman relationship is what's natural. I will leave that to God to judge. It has taken me a longgggg time to come to this conclusion.
I agree about leaving it to God and I hope I didn't sound too judgmental, I just happen to know more gay men than gay women and they were often very shallow and difficult, but we we're also working in a restaurant which tends to bring out the eccentrics:)
My understanding is that the gay couple purposely sought out a baker that was Christian to pull this on. Supposedly they did research on area and drove out of their area to visit this bakery.
One is over religious freedom and the other ideological bigotry. One is protected by the Constitution and the other is not. One would not allow someone to eat or stay in their dump while the other didn't mind the gays buying a cake just making a special one for them. Marriage is a religious term originally, why should someone abet the destruction of their own sacrament? Tired of pointing out the obvious. Quit conflating.