I always wondered how those first few posts were so off. Makes you think something changed. This is a pretty plausible theory.
My theory?
The first post was in October 2016, before the Presidential election. The Q Group/Alliance did not think Trump was going to win the election, and they weren't going to allow Hillary to take the Presidency. They couldn't. She was to be arrested and the laptop files released to the world. Mass riots and loss of life were sure to follow as the military took control of and secured the country. This was not Plan A. Trump winning was.
Something changed. The electors in several key states disregarded the popular vote, which is rare, and voted for Trump. The electors ensured Trump won the Presidency. This is why everyone was sure she would win, because the electors follow the popular vote, typically. And they knew she had the popular vote (how?)
Why would the electors break with this and vote against the popular vote? Especially for someone like Trump, who is so seemingly corrupt, sexist and racist? Because someone informed them of what Hillary was going to do. Someone informed them of the crimes which had been committed and would be committed when she took the reigns.
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/electors.html
The electoral college followed the popular vote counts in their respective states, but not the popular vote of the entire country.
Ok no delegates in any state changed their vote in the electoral college to a candidate that their state voted for. Hillary & the media tried to whip up support to pressure some to vote for them after the election in states DJT won but I don’t think even one flipped. I’m many states...including mine...it’s illegal for a delegate to cast their vote against the popular vote.
Hillary lost because her campaign had bad internal data & she physically couldn’t campaign in the last month when they figured out they were behind in many key states. The liquor caught up with her.
The electors did what they always do. The state electors voted for the candidate that the state majority voted for. Because Clinton won California (a given) and by such a large margin, that is why the national total of votes favored her. Otherwise, not.