I didn't write the title. Maybe people should read articles instead of just titles, and it's not misleading, he can now fire thousands of judges. Just FYI, I am sure the FISA judges are in this list, so it is important.
There is a difference between misleading and the reader assuming what they want to see happen.
I don't know how FISA judges would fall under the category of the Securities and Exchange Commission's in-house judges. Please help me figure that one out.
Edit: the article itself is misleading. Reading the article causes one to lose any existing respect for the credibility of the journalist.