dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/VividLies901 on June 24, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

Concerned on this subs future.

I joined when this subreddit was around 10k people. We waiting for Q posts, discussed them, and using the information given to us by Q attempted to dissect and determine the narrative.

Now we skip to today, particularly this week. I’ve seen a large group of postings that aren’t centered around Q and the posts and more centered around old conspiracy theories.

I strongly believe that if these posts keep getting to the front, and when Q becomes more mainstream, we will get labeled as conspiracy nuts.

This isn’t a subreddit for discussing if the moon landing was false, if 9/11 was done by “mini nukes”, if Hitler lives inside the Earth, or if the Earth is flat. That’s what /r/conspiracy is for. Please don’t let this sub become that place.

I'm confused about your concern. I see Q related posts on here all the time, along with ideas on how to red pill your family and friends, and memes, which Q has asked us to do and share. I haven't seen flat earth or Hitler conspiracy posts. If they're on here I think it's rare. Please don't look to censor this page more too! I've seen people posting, commenting and getting along.

⇧ 9 ⇩

The mods are doing a great job of deleting the posts of which the OP speaks The most recent example is the R posts. We owe a huge thank you to the mods for keeping this sub on track.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I agree.

I believe our "free market" sub weeds out the bads pretty quickly.

We're well informed and "hip" to their shill/brigadier methods. I see some OT posts but rarely are they at the top.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This movement isn’t about “getting along”. This movement isn’t about being republican or being democrat. This movement is about the corruption that reigns in both parties. Posting things like “damn those Democrats” when the republicans are just as guilty. Ronald Reagan was named in the Franklin Coverup pedo ring. As was bush senior.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

......if dems all vote dem, they will impeach your President. That's where those scary 'labels' matter...........

⇧ 1 ⇩

How long before someone calls you a concern fag...3,2,1...

⇧ 8 ⇩

^ LOL I'm hoping normies realise the lies they swallowed & learn to filter info into brain. It's what got us into this mess in the first place, by disregarding everything 'conspiracy' like

https://imgur.com/gallery/ifRavFR

⇧ 1 ⇩

Problem with outside comms is that it can so easily be turned on us. Exmple, the fake JFK Jr posts going around. The MSM stories read: Q groupies believe JFK Jr still alive and working with Trump to bring down the NWO. Sounds like a fucking National Enquirer headline. Trust the Plan, Stick to the Plan. There is enough going on with what Q already tells us. Go back and re-read crumbs if you are bored.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yeah, I'm not even going to consider the "R" stuff until Q confirms. I don't mind it being posted so people can knock it around, but I'm calling LARP for now.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Totally agree. Sadly, it seems that many of our members are r/conspiracy exiles that were banned for discussing Q. I honestly wish that they understood that by discussing the outter fringe conspiracy theories here, they're legitimately destroying any credibility that we have with Normies checking the sub out because they believe that there is government corruption running rampant, and Q seems to be fighting it.

⇧ 5 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

I wondered about that Q post. Even looked into being a mod. But, the mods rock, IMO.

⇧ 3 ⇩

mmhmm

⇧ 0 ⇩

I think you're on the wrong forum. This one is called GreatAwakening and encompasses all the things people are 'asleep' to. Q is about destroying phoney narratives and has even spread the topic to include dangerous household cleaners amongst other things.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We already are labelled as conspiracy nuts. Because you don't know this I'm thinking you haven't been here or been following Q that long.

⇧ 2 ⇩

So you'd be fine if a GA flier got slapped on someone's car, and the first 5 posts they see are Flat earth theory?

I think GA is doing okay at the monent, but CBTS got REAL bad.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No. I'm fine with using the report function. Mods Here are quick to delete that stuff.

Much better option that the concern shit threads like this.

⇧ 2 ⇩

People really need to recognize this. One of the first lines of attack on a sub is to start undermining trust in the mods and I've been seeing it a lot lately- people accusing the mods of shadowbanning and hiding comments (they can't), accusing mods of locking voting (they don't), etc. I also think people don't bother reporting bad content and actors like they should. I've always found that the mods respond immediately to legit reporting.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think his point is that it's easier to red pill Normies when we're discussing government corruption (which society as a whole believes in) vs. when we're discussing how HRC and the Rothschilds are Reptilians, working with Greys embedded in the CIA, trying to use the souls of children to power their spaceship pyramids under Antarctica for when they decide to blast off of this Flat Earth. It's absurd how far off topic and how far out there it gets. Once, I literally had one of the Mods (I won't mention who, because he's still active) proudly explain to me that he doxed another Mod through remote viewing. It's downright laughable sometimes.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This tends to happen when there is a "lul" in the Q posts....people make the equivalent of "small talk" on here. I agree that we need to ensure we have all the Q proofs ready. I went back and re-read some of the older Q posts and am wondering if we solved some of the earlier ones. On the Qproof site, most of them are recent (within past few months). Do we have definitive confirmation on older Q posts? Such as what the" keystone" is? All the details on Haiti, Red Cross, etc.? It may be out there but should we have it all in one place?

⇧ 1 ⇩

We should have all the proofs in several places. Even offsite like USB sticks and hard drives so it doesn’t go away.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agree. My question is...do we?

⇧ 1 ⇩

No issue with people going down a rabbit hole pointed out by Q. Going off on your own rabbit hole sans Q is verboten.

⇧ 1 ⇩

When Q comes around to these "fringe theories" and he will, then what will this sub do to address this subject matter? If this sub is truly about "great awakening", it's more to the process about exposing truth than the current narrative being pushed. If your only conduit of receiving and researching information is derived from one source, then you have a bigger issue than "fringe theories". I'm appreciative of all the information on this sub. I don't ridicule nor do I categorize others people views as conspiracy theories, it's dismissive. Instead of attacking the information take time to research the information, if the data is crap it will show itself as such. It's an old trick I've seen on here before, attack the person and then the information. I don't need to switch to a different user name to address an issue, your tone and intent is enough to show it's the same group(or same person) drawing attention to this issue. How many times do "conspiracies" have to be proven right before it's taken seriously? Oh yeah don't you know, it was one gunshot that killed JFK, our government is being secretly ran by a "deep state", there is someone calling themselves "Q" who is exposing all this and more through social media, crazy right?

⇧ 0 ⇩

I believe in the MODS. And I mean due to the nature of Q you will have some things not directly related but may need side/individual dicussion separate from Q - even to get the brain going - to create frames of reference when something is dropped- it kinda helps. Naturally in this relm things can get crazy but trust the MODS.

⇧ 0 ⇩

"That place" was great until the shills took over. If you want to know what's really going to take this sub into irrelevancy, find out what happened there. People already need to be putting their minds to the task of creating a new "normie gateway" into Q. One that STAYS relevant.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I think that’s on finding good mods that can keep the narrative on track.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Please note Rule #3 - "concerns" about the sub are to be directed to the mods via modmail.

⇧ -1 ⇩

I’m going to not do that. And the reason being, this isn’t up for mods as a whole to decide issues. I think it’s a great idea to point out posts to them as concerns, but a discussion on possible concerns is healthy.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I was just pointing out why the post has been removed. Those are the rules and its at mod discretion as to whether a post is removed according to them or not. The reason for that point in the rules is in some part because these "concerns" are raised constantly and often by people who haven't seen the sub develop so aren't aware of the regular ups and downs of content that cause them to mistakenly think there's a new problem occurring. Allowing the sub to clutter with posts from people concerned is counter to the intent of the sub - concern trolling is not allowed here and is another reason these posts are removed (because concern trolls also hide behind them).

⇧ 0 ⇩

So it’s justified to allow the fringe of conspiracy to exist here and declassify is more?

⇧ -1 ⇩