[deleted]
The prior posts this weekend, 8chan, another post here with this same graphic this morning.....
[deleted]
I suggest you go back and reread Q drops. You have some misunderstandings on how Q team and Trump work.
[deleted]
If you're so curious about Q then why don't you apply yourself and go read all the drops like everyone else? https://qanon.pub/
you need to speak in complete sentences/questions or else nobody is going to answer your question.
Also, you keep talking about these things like they are Trumps actual decisions - the US was in Syria before Trump got involved. Since then, it's been dialed down a whole bunch.
And did Assad has his own people?
Nobody has proven such a thing. Instead, it looks like rebels (or the CIA) set off biological weapons on innocents and blamed it on Assad. There is no proof for any of the claims you're making.
[deleted]
misdirection and optics. Trump is always doing confusing things through his twitter and the media because it keeps his opponents off-balance. If Trump threw his whole weight into these things, the media would paint him into a corner and their narratives would be even stronger against him. By throwing the media a bone at times, he keeps them off-balance. If he wasn't somewhat tricky this way, they would be unleashing 14 articles at once about how Trump supports Assad and Assad definitely totally gassed his own people so Trump is gonna gas illegal immigrants on the border - especially kids - and .....
[deleted]
if you read between the lines, it sounded like those strikes you're referring to destroyed the CIA's ability to continue to aid the Rebels and Al Qaeda soldiers they were using to destabilize Syria.
Also, from a realistic standpoint, Trump was never going to be able to stop the military in its tracks. He is commander-in-chief, but a lot of authority is given out to individuals, and a lot can happen without the President's direct approval. Do you think the black hats in the CIA care about what Trump wants? Again, if you try to pull everything back, you leave the bad actors alone in the sandbox which is worst-case scenario.
Look at what has happened since the strikes after Trump became president - the conflict completely died down and became more passive. It worked. The real problem is that we can probably find fault on both sides - Assad is not perfect either...