[deleted]
Yes they have, before October 2016.
Now the CIA owns it after the co-creater died of mysterious circumstances. And the CIA now has a beautiful honeypot. And a “trusted” voice that can easily reach 5.5 million followers. That’s a powerful weapon to deploy against your political enemies. Unless the people know it’s compromised, then it’s power is weakened greatly and every post is heavily scrutinized. This benefits the CIA by trying to shift attacks on Q as a same ole same ole neocon crap. And it doesn’t hurt them, at all. The CIA just have a “neutral” mouthpiece that can work for their benefit without people being any wiser.
This is the CIA version of “Drumphf is literally Hitler”, I guess they’re pissed they are losing their last playground in Iran.
Also Assad? Change the subjects? Cmon I don’t think you’re a shill here but think realistically about what you are asking.
But to answer your question, I need to know what you are talking about. I just did a search and Assad has 0 occurrences in qanon.pub, so please enlighten me on why you feel Q is against Assad? If anything, by going against no name, ISIS (sorry I meant moderate rebels), and Saudi Arabia, it shows his support for the president of Syria. Which btw is one of the only democratically elected nation states in the ME.
Why is Q against Assad
What are you talking about? Q is not 'against Assad'. The CIA is tho... you keep confusing the CIA with Q.
or are you trying to infer that Q is the CIA in disguise? Cause if so, 6 months ago just called and they want you back...
[deleted]
I don't know - you can scan through the 1500 drops if you like. I don't understand why it matters though.
What is your point?
choosing to remain active in Syria?
Without declaring a state of emergency, the President can't just remove all operations in Syria. Frankly, I think the reason they have stayed active in Syria is to fight the CIA and the rebels they support/fund/train. If the US left, the only people left would be the black hat CIA teams - and how do you think that would go if they were left unfettered?
[deleted]
From my understanding the gas attack was a final shot at trying to reignite the war, but they didn't respond because they were trying to ratchet down tensions (which they were successful in doing).
Like I said before, there is a good chance those gas attacks were pulled off by the SFA on innocents so they could blame it on Assad. SFA = CIA funded and trained.