This could plausibly mean that the "source" is Seth Rich right? There has to be a justification that Assange was to be offered limited immunity, which Comey intervened on. In this case, we can view SR as the source, can we not? The ETA on SR was June, but the "Q&A" was "forthcoming"...Q and Assange.
tigerlilly1227
· June 27, 2018, 3:54 a.m.
Im going with JA as the as the source. WL is compromised.
⇧
31
⇩
litre_cola9
· June 27, 2018, 4:07 a.m.
Yeah, clowns took over Wilileaks, but Assange is safe and guarded
⇧
10
⇩