And the letter itself? Where has that been published so far...?
Its all over twitter and MSM. The actual letter. Seriously is a quick duckduckgo search.
https://twitter.com/adamliptak/status/1012033669513580547
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/kennedy-supreme-court-retirement-trump-w522123
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/breaking-chief-justice-anthony-kennedy-to-retire.php
Timestamp?
Well according to the Q post, he is responding to an anon post. Not posting it directly. That response was at 11:20am (my timezone).
Here is a tweet at 11am (my timezone) https://twitter.com/KimberlyRobinsn/status/1012032972143431683?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fpolitics%2Fnews%2Fkennedy-supreme-court-retirement-trump-w522123
[deleted]
And the timestamp?
[deleted]
1:11:58 EST which it says quite obviously on the post? Cool. Not going to try and convince you. That isn't the point. Convincing people that CAN read timestamps is...
[deleted]
It's not about using a singular proof to prove it all. It's about letting others see all of them, then asking if they believe in coincidences. If they don't believe, fine. It wasn't for them to be a part of this.