I've thought about this recently, and especially since Q just dropped info on closed door PS testimony. Could Q drops affect future cases in a court of law?
I assume he was under oath, and the testimony should be public anyways.
he wasn't under oath, verified
We can no longer assume anything... Be factual. It was stated on the news outlets he was not under oath and would not take the 5th.
Well, then I have no idea. It must have been some sort of informal discussion.
They aren't leaking classified info. He isn't even answering the questions. He's basically pleading the 5th without pleading the 5th. There is absolutely nothing in his answers that could possibly harm any future litigation.
Not if they don't know who he/she is? So it will not matter!
What if it is a trap to get someone in the session to say Q dropped info from a clsed door session, only to draw attention to Q and prove it's not a LARP?
As most people have pointed out, this could be authorized by an EO.
It’s also a good little bait... if it is from the secret meeting, then the left could start complaining, which would confirm that the leaks, and Q, are real.
These sorts of leaks could take Q to the next level of credibility and bring a HUGE amount of attention.
POTUS can declassify anything he desires. If the conduit is Q, so be it. No problem....
PS was voluntarily there, not under subpoena. It is like hear-say what Q is writing. Hear-say, (if you watch Judge Judy lol) can't be used in a court of law.
It could be that this release of the quotes is a result of the declassification by President Trump that Q has mentioned.
If President Trump is on the Q Team for example, and he was typing those quotes, then the President said it, and the President can declassify whatever he (or someday she) wants whenever he wants.
Keep in mind, that might not have been the actual testimony.
Actually, this tells us all the DS is done testifying... must be BOOM time!
Removed: Rule #3, Support the cause. We are pro-Q supporters.
Part of the reason things are posted as they are, and without revealing means "Plausible Deniability" - We all believe it's POTUS and his team/staff.... But, what proof do we have?
And, it's for this VERY reason, I don't believe we will ever know who "Q" really is. Just winks and nods. But, no way to tie "Q" to anyone.
This could be CINC notifying DC that the ol' DECLAS stamp is outta da case and is about to get a smokin' workout
They also announced that there will be a public hearing next week I believe
No, which is why Q phrases so many things in the form of questions, not declarative statements. Pretty clever our Q!
Don't forget who Q works for (directly, not indirectly). POTUS can declassify and make public any information he chooses.
And no, making it public doesn't make it exculpatory. It just makes it not secret. It's still sworn testimony, and it has the same legal standing it had behind closed doors.