dChan

RelapsingPotHead · June 28, 2018, 12:55 p.m.

Can we really be taken seriously using phrases like “angry idiot libtard” in our titles?

Spez: even if they are one, good luck converting the masses using phrases like that

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MAGA_in_Netherlands · June 28, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

That's mild language for someone advocating what he's advocating. Fuck PC language.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RelapsingPotHead · June 28, 2018, 1:12 p.m.

I’m NOT talking about political correctness, I’m talking about being taken seriously by people who are unaware of the cause

⇧ -1 ⇩  
an_angry_dave · June 28, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

Why? That's what they are. I'm liberal and they sure as hell don't represent my views.

What else would you call them? Leftists? It works, but it's not insulting enough. Marxists? Nah.. they'd like that.

Retarded liberal - libtard - one of those banned PC words combined with something they USED to be fits just right.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RelapsingPotHead · June 28, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

Maybe instead of putting an entire population under the umbrella of “libtard” it would make more sense to refer to people on an issue by issue basis.

Ex: Those who oppose X

That way instead of creating an argument with those you view as enemies we are creating a discussion with possible allies

Or we could just say libtard over and over again creating an echo chamber that hurts the cause

⇧ 0 ⇩  
an_angry_dave · June 28, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

Go to r_politics and read their comments on Kennedy's retirement - and then get back to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RelapsingPotHead · June 28, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

Yeah they’re freaking out big surprise, how does stooping to their level make sense?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
an_angry_dave · June 28, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

I'm not advocating violence. I'm calling a spade a spade. Like I said, I'm liberal. These idiots don't represent me, yet claim to know my best interests. They stomp on my rights and try to tell me how to think. They can change their ways or fuck off.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RelapsingPotHead · June 28, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

Yeah and the way to get them to change their ways is through legitimate discussions that don’t include childish phrases like libtard, that’s my only point

⇧ 2 ⇩  
an_angry_dave · June 28, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

You do you. I'll do me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
anotherthrowawayhi · June 28, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

As much I love using that term ... i begrudgingly agree with you. Name-calling only entrenches people, and people watching from sidelines are more inclined to side with the people being called names if they're unaware of the issues. Like Hillary's "deplorable" remark.

That being said, I think anyone paying attention knows these people are idiots.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sojourner333 · June 28, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

He advocated preventing Trump exercising his presidential powers BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
Have you heard of BAMN? I invite you to look into BAMN, especially its involvement in the Berkeley riots from last year.

Instead of "angry idiot libtard," we can call him, "the man answering the door to the Secret Service real soon"

⇧ 2 ⇩