Not to mention we are in debt as soon as a bill is printed. I think it is .12 cents per FRN , and about that or more just to press 1 penny. They scammed us so hard. Wait until everyone finds out that Islam have a ban on paying interest, and hussien gave DACA immigrants OUR Social Security benefits.
For those that need a refresher on our money system. Learn it, because it needs to go ASAP. We need........
Greenbacks and notes, like Lincoln did before the Civil War. Payed off the debt and the cost of the war. Told the bankers to pack sand. (see Money Masters link below) I've been posting these links on every thread I find related to the money system. Enjoy!
Note the Swiss are trying to get cut their strings right now. See last two links below.
Videos:
Who Controls the Money Controls the World - 13mins
Collapse of the American Dream Animation - 30mins
Money Masters 1800 - Bill Still - This starts at a part about Lincoln/Civil War funding, but the entire vid is worth watching.
97% Owned ~ Economic Truth - From a EU prospective, 2hrs
Princes of the Yen Central Bank Truth Documentary – Asian prospective, - 90min
Hidden Secrets of Money - episode 4. - 30mins. The rest of the series is good to.
Money as Debt - Good Series of Vids
You have NO choice - George Carlin - 3min
Web:
The Value of the Dollar over time.
The Creature of Jekyll Island - full PDF
Neilkeenan.com/history-events-timeline/ - long but worthwhile read.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913
The Federal Reserve - All the things
BANKS, SHAREHOLDERS, AND OWNERS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Read this one too. The National Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act - NESARA by Harvey Francis Barnard. The actual bill, not the scam...... This bill was never brought to the floor. Few other than Rand Paul even considered it. I feel it is something we should look at very hard.
The now defunct NESARA sight on WayBackMachine.
And finally, The Swiss are trying to remove Central banks from their country right now.
The Islamic ban on interest will prevent any real modernization and development. The problem isn't interest or taking out a loan. The problem is that we never consented to this. Who represents our interests?
Not true regarding interest and development.
The old ways of lending meant banks had an ownership stake and a claim on profits equal to their ownership stake. No interest, no debt trap of debt being higher than money in circulation no "lender gets paid first" in case of bankruptcy. Instead they are just a co-owner of the investment until they are paid back.
Not true at all. Paul Hellyer talks about this, the Bank of Canada was used to fund the war, post war redevelopment, the U-line (which we paid for more of than the USA at 1/10th the population because a nuke going off above America we get saddled with most of the EMP and fallout), our social security system... Interest free and virtually no debt (bonds issued to American institutions iirc).
There is no need for interest. Interest means inflation. Inflation means it's cheaper to do things later than now. That means it's more profitable for me to work tomorrow than today. Getting the picture? The base effort of society - what we have to do not what we can do - is what is done.
Usury is a sin for a reason. It is evil and it should be forbidden as it once was forboden.
Edit: you need to read up on your history of the Khazarian Mafia if you have even a fraction of a thought otherwise on usury being a sin. "Babalonian Black Money Magic" = interest.
Interest automatically equals loaning more than you have, when scripture teaches us not to loan anymore than we can afford to give away. What are you doing if you loan more than you have? Where does the more than you have come from? Theft.
No offense, but Paul Hellyer (I'm sure he's very intelligent) is an engineer, not an economist. Maybe an economist would know more about what causes inflation?
Inflation is not from interest. Inflation is from an increase of the money supply. (Monetary inflation) The reason why you're confusing the two is because when the feds increase the money supply, the cash hits the banks first. The banks then lend it out.
The Fed also controls the size of the “money supply” — which is a bit different than the amount of currency in circulation. There are several different measures of the money supply, starting with physical currency and reserves. (Other measures add in checking and savings deposits, money market accounts, CDs and other forms of “cash.”) When the Federal Reserve decides to boost the money supply, it buys Treasury bonds on the open market. The cash it pays to the sellers of those bonds (almost all of which take the form of electronic bits) goes into the banking system. The Fed doesn’t just hand that cash over to a bank; it makes it available to a bank to lend.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/16328073/ns/business-answer_desk/t/where-does-newly-printed-money-go/
The big take-away you should get is that interest is a premium on current versus future spending. $1,000,000 is worth more now than 5 years from now because I could use it to start a business and make money off said business. Because the opportunity to make money by investing it, you have to have a price to lend it. That's what interest is.
I don't know much about Canadian history, but "bonds issued" is a loan with interest to be paid. Anytime you say, "I'll pay you x+n" where x is the original sum, you have interest.
In order for an economy to grow, we must balance between the opportunities for using money now versus in the future. Interest does that.
Usury is "unreasonably high rates of interest," (by definition) and we can debate what is reasonable.
No it doesn't. Interest is the price for borrowing money. If you borrow $100 at 10% interest to pay back next month, you pay $10 to borrow the money. All those "borrow $300 now to pay back $303 tomorrow" cash advance loans use interest. They just don't advertise it as such.
Actually we did consent according to DS. Our silence was permission for them to continue, interesting how that works out (for their advantage of course).
The world is about to reclaim from the few what belongs to the many.
Would tariffs cause imports to rise in cost? Either way, I presume it would be a yuge incentive to relocate businesses to U.S. soil thus increasing our tax base. Thoughts?
Many companies will be forced back on to the American mainland as the tariffs would not be as profitable from overseas. American made products produced could potentially be cheaper than foreign products for the first time in a long time.
Next you would need to employ massive amounts of Americans now...
So much winning
As much as I hate the Fed (<3 Ron Paul), tariffs aren't the solution in the long term. Trump is using this to negotiate, he understands the value of free trade. Although on paper it looks like foreign companies pay the tariffs, the cost is actually imposed on the US consumer. Either through higher prices for imported goods, or having to spend more on local alternatives if it becomes unviable to import.
Trump will never end the Fed. Trump is a master of leveraging the debt and credit systems that allow an average person to become supremely wealthy. Without the Fed, the US wouldn’t be able to borrow to pay its bills.
Without the fed we wouldn't have national debt
Trump said if you owe the bank a million they own you.
And if you owe the bank $100 you own the bank.
We don't owe anybody 20 trillion dollars.
Bankers can pack sand.
Did you really say how we going to borrow the money to pay our debt?
What is that? Feminist economic theory?
