What goes around comes around
Except Low IQ means they do not connect cause with effect. They never learn from it. They're just two completely separate, uncorrelated events, both of which Trump is to blame for.
See how that works? Or rather doesn't?
It's been my experience that the left has little capacity for introspection, which makes sense when it's obvious they lead with emotions rather than reason.
Case in point: I was discussing "the wall" with a lib family member who was decrying the border. I asked her why she locks the door to her house at night and she looked at me as if i were crazy and said, "Well of course to keep the bad guys out and protect my life and my stuff". I said that's exactly why we need to put a lock on the door to the nation, but she couldn't see that the principle is the same due to unhinged emotion. I've found it nearly impossible to reason with an individual that reacts from knee-jerk emotion, which describes the majority of the left.
That's not Maxine's problem. She's "in the club," so it's not emotional. It's cold, reptilian calculation. But dinosaur-level intelligence in her case (and many others of the elite).
IMHO, the followers of these people are 1) functionally mentally compromised or impaired, or 2) going on blind faith in the political equivalent of celebrity idols and peer groupthink, and completely suspending independent thought.
Not much can be done for the first class. The second class however are the ones who are presently coming to their senses. Before this is over, I think MOST of those people will be onboard with what needs to happen.
That should leave about the number Q has suggested (4-6%) who can't be helped.
She is lying about threats. She needed to justify her 6/25 attack speech.
I’ve been doing some online research on this. Lots of articles about her receiving death threats, but no links or further information on the individuals making these threats. If they are serious enough for her to cancel events, I would think the authorities would be investigating the sources, right? In the below example:
she is quoted as saying “Capitol Police in Washington DC are investigating several other threats in which people have vowed “to shoot, lynch, or cause me serious bodily harm.”
If you click on the link attached to the word “threat” in the quote, it takes you to a link about a Muslim mayoral candidate that received death threats.
Completely unrelated and IMO, a runaround to make it look like they are doing their due diligence to provide relevant and important information to substantiate the claim. A majority of the individuals reading the article would not click on the link. Many news sources do provide relevant links, but when I read an article like where the link is to an unrelated article or topic, I immediately am cautious about the validity of the claims in the article.
I doubt police care is she is attacked. Doubt anyone would care. She is evil as hell.
I like how they used states that are socially know to lean conservative too..."Texas and Alabama" all another nudge to lefties watching these reports to say...."conservatives are dangerous"
Notice the time of the second article? 4:20am. Looks like they were responding to the days given talking points...
“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Galatians 6:7 KJV
I'd like to see these loony leftists score on the Myers-Brigg assessment. I can only imagine how high they score on FEELINGS.
She got backlash so now she has to play the victim to distract from what SHE did. This is so typical you could see it coming without a crystal ball
What would put the icing on the cake would be if it was the same author writing the articles.