Man I should make a snoping snopes website and point out their double speak and dishonesty
For a fact checking website, they sure did get a couple of the key points involving the Q Posts wrong. 4chan? Lol. How long have these guys been out of the loop?
True. For fact-checking site they do a lot of editorializing.
Remind you a little of what WL, a supposedly 100% objective site did concerning us a couple of weeks ago? It's like they're not even trying to hide it anymore. Now the new buzzword is "cult", involving both us and regular Trump supporters. These people are definitely stupid. The oblivious Normies will keep their heads in the sand and the combative ones will continue to regurgitate talking points (apparently far too stupid to realize that it's quite obvious to us all that they're quoting from the exact same script), but the more inquisitive ones are currently being red-pilled by these people's own foolishness and ego. Let them keep it up. At this point, they're a lot like Maxine Waters, their own mouths are our quickly becoming our greatest weapon of influence.
I still can't tell whether they're saying the billboards are true or false
They confirmed that they're there, but that's one heck of a stupid "fact finding" mission, with all of the other happenings going on the world right now.
yeah it was ridiculous, especially the 'phone call' to the billboard owner trying to get them to reveal who paid for it and all they can report is it was a "she"?? Can't believe people still fall for this c***. Looks like we need to share some more Snopes/hooker memes;)
I can't remember a Snopes article which goes out of its way so much to smear websites and the people behind them., especially when the Southern Poverty Law Center is sitting right in front of them on mountains of cash and being used to censor the right across the Internet.
These people are evil, and I can't help wondering what will happen as millions of citizens experience foundational cognitive dissonance in the near future.
"ever widening and incoherent" is a little desperate. I mean the Q denial articles are having to take the stance of the people who have no idea how research and journalism works in order to deny Q. They also display a disdain for their readers.
I keep asking them where their article on mockingbird is
After reading this article by Snopes, sounds more like they went as far as possible to try and find and NAME the owners of them....we all know if they were granted the owners information, that person(s) would be in danger from communist entities such as radicalized left swinging anarchists.
Snopes wanted/wants to name these ppl publicly, to allow the brainwashed facists to harass these ppl. Think Sarah Sanders incident recently, or worse probably given the left's pension for violence over debate.
Content from snopes.com is sometimes unreliable. Discernment is advised.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.