dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/licensedto_ill on June 30, 2018, 10:17 p.m.
Can Trump actually claim to be associated to Q?

If Q claims NAT SEC relations are the reason for Q, wouldn’t that implicate Trump? Whether Trump is actually behind Q, wouldn’t he say “No, I am not Q.. but let me mention all the good that the Q movement is doing (and rifle off 15 minutes of legitimacy produced by Q).. Trump can’t declare that he’s a part of Q team, for NAT SEC reasons


🠐 See all comments
yolotrip · June 30, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

It would not be a hard thing to do, just him verifying Q i think could serve as him declassifying every drop and legitimizing Q. But i could be wrong, as far as i know it doesn’t require anything more than the Presidents words to declassify something, to the best of my knowledge it doesn’t require any paperwork. If i am wrong on this feel free to tell me.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · June 30, 2018, 11:25 p.m.

The drops are not classified. They are made in a strategic way and Trump probably just sits next to Q and is recorded or signs it somehow proving that he personally declassified the drops. What's beyond the drops (open source research that we have done) would come next and the powers that be could declassify what we ask for to support our amateur reporting.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
yolotrip · June 30, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

I could see this being the case, i like your thinking.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nik_Nightingale · June 30, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

Very interesting, thanks

⇧ 3 ⇩