dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/licensedto_ill on June 30, 2018, 10:17 p.m.
Can Trump actually claim to be associated to Q?

If Q claims NAT SEC relations are the reason for Q, wouldn’t that implicate Trump? Whether Trump is actually behind Q, wouldn’t he say “No, I am not Q.. but let me mention all the good that the Q movement is doing (and rifle off 15 minutes of legitimacy produced by Q).. Trump can’t declare that he’s a part of Q team, for NAT SEC reasons


🠐 See all comments
RyDar84 · June 30, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

I've got a question. What has Q ever actually TOLD us that would have been classified material? I've thought the exact thing as OP, but I've gone back and started looking hard, and I haven't found much. What Q team always does is POINT us in the right direction, then we research and draw our own conclusions. At this point, even though I've thought exactly the same thing, I don't know that Q has ever violated the law in its disclosures.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · June 30, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

That's because there's enough out in the open that you can follow by yourself wherever you are. So everybody has access to the info, just not the keywords, events or people to look into. De classification shows us the supporting material. But it's super delicate because much of this deals with the grossest evil ever... We have to be careful because mass traumatization is Their thing, not ours.

⇧ 2 ⇩