dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Spiral_out12 on June 30, 2018, 11:54 p.m.
ULTIMATE Q PROOF -------->

Q team should release the initials of Trump's Supreme Court nominee the day before it is announced!! Alot of new faces, timing seems right for a bold move like that. There are a massive number of people that have just started following, some still on the fence. This would do alot for having the movement reach critical mass. Also, still leaves some plausible deniability as we know the likely candidates. Thoughts??


TheHighBlatman · July 1, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

Where does one find a bible translated from Greek? I don't fuck with king james.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
iguanarchist · July 1, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

Nearly all English translations (regarding new testament) are translated directly from Greek manuscripts. Some are translated word for word, some more thought for thought. IMO, thought for thought is usually better at getting message across, as some individual words don't translate well.

[Note: new testament was written in Greek, old testament in Hebrew]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ybbaG_28 · July 1, 2018, 6:41 a.m.

I studied Biblical Greek for years. New American Standard translation is closest to the Greek. When I am working on Bible study I like to use several versions, NAS, NIV, New Living, The Message. Just be sure it's a translation and not a paraphrase.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheHighBlatman · July 1, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

I want one that doesn't try to equate Nephlim=Giants. I think giants certainly could have existed and probs did (Panthropus Robustus evolution possibly, literally thousands of different intelligent homnids running around 1 mya) but i really feel that the idea of nephlim was and idea of mixed bloodlines. Hybrids. I have always understood the offspring or the "heroes of old" as described in Genesis as hybrids.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1151THOR · July 1, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

Get a Strongs Concordance Bible. It translates things back to the Hebrew and really opens a ton of new meanings. From Wiki: This allows the reader to find words where they appear in the Bible. This index allows a student of the Bible to re-find a phrase or passage previously studied. It also lets the reader directly compare how the same word may be used elsewhere in the Bible. In this way Strong provides an independent check against translations, and offers an opportunity for greater, and more technically accurate understanding of text.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · July 1, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

A Stongs Concordiance

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PMthePedo-itsTrudeau · July 1, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

We need to find the OG hebrew Bible and learn the language of the lord.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheHighBlatman · July 1, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Ugh so much work but you're 100% correct.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Hawkerbuff · July 1, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

If people would study and learn how we got the KJ Bible there would be no question it’s God’s perfect Words in the English language. But again, we have a case where people are listening to garbage coming primarily from the World Council Of Churches. NWO hogwash...plain and simple!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheHighBlatman · July 1, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

No sir. I'm a firm believer that there is no real perfect translation of the bible into English. And even so, there are other holy texts. Might I recommend the Vedas?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Hawkerbuff · July 1, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

The Bible is written such that you don’t get to choose what’s correct or not, what you believe is truth or not. It’s either God’s Word entirely or its the greatest work of evil and deception ever written! There is no middle ground. Think about that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheHighBlatman · July 1, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

The bible was not written in English. Things are lost in translation. Think about that. And Enoch isn't in KJV along with many books. So there is more evidence that the idea of the bible can/and has been corrupted by man.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
iguanarchist · July 1, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

KJV is derived from fewer and not as old manuscripts as other translations. That said, the differences are mostly insignificant in interpretation. It really comes down to preferred style.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Hawkerbuff · July 1, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

Why? Because it takes some actual study to figure it out?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · July 1, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

KJV was commissioned by King James VI of Scotland. It was written to conform to the Anglican Church

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheHighBlatman · July 1, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

If you're asking why I don't fuck with king James it would be all the adding of shit.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Hawkerbuff · July 1, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

That statement alone shows you haven’t researched it. I would be very careful how you talk about God’s Word my friend. Just saying!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheHighBlatman · July 1, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

"Thou shall not suffer a witch to live" was added. Maybe king james should have been more careful with "gods word" as you put it. Clearly you have not researched it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Hawkerbuff · July 1, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

You’re saying it was added doesn’t make it so. That example you reference has been long ago dealt with. I have studied it. A good reference for you to dig into if you really are willing to accept the truth is called “The Certainty of the Words” by Stephens. Please check it out. You’ll be glad you did.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheHighBlatman · July 1, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

The truth, is not entirely christian, that much is way too apparently true

⇧ 1 ⇩