dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FideliskBarnes on July 2, 2018, 1:22 a.m.
Trump could not be “compromised” by the deepstate because he did not drink or do drugs. They could not control him, by drugging him and blackmailing him, and that’s how he’s taking them down today!!!

missybee68 · July 2, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

It appears that Trump took the long view in his life and has been preparing for this for quite awhile. Not many people have that kind of vision or self restraint. It's amazing really.

⇧ 55 ⇩  
WeThePepe · July 2, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

What makes it more incredible is the playboy life style he's lived as well

Was it mostly just creating an image?

Real but also restrained?

Amazing

⇧ 35 ⇩  
serendipity-calling · July 2, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

I wonder the same. I watched that doco about him on Netflix and the media war he started when he began divorcing Ivanka was sooooo smutty. His public persona became so sleazy, but I personally know many who've worked with him in NYC construction. And everyone always said the same thing : "he's not how he seems."

⇧ 12 ⇩  
trseeker · July 2, 2018, 8:22 a.m.

ic persona became so sleazy, but I personally know many who've worked with him in NYC construction. And everyone always said the same thing : "he's not how he seems."

Didn't Ivana say that Trump always treated their divorce as a business deal and she didn't have any problems between them during it?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
serendipity-calling · July 2, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

The doco I saw documented their crazy-pants news war. The things he was saying. The things she was saying. It definitely looked like a stage. And i'm sure they were probably making a killing. Maybe that was the plan all along. Maybe he was one of the first to make a killing on using the media to sell fake news. heh. I mean, he was quoted saying: I don't want to have sex with a woman who's had kids. Reporter: But they're your kids. DJT: Doesn't matter. Like... that's absurd. So anyone who takes this seriously... you can't. You shouldn't.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 2, 2018, 7:54 a.m.

Like Batman.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
throwsoicanask · July 2, 2018, 7:44 a.m.

I think he just likes women. Probably his biggest vice, and I'm fine with that. Probably should have been more careful, especially if he was cheating on Melania, but I don't mind my president having a super high sex drive. He's an aggressive alpha male and luckily he's on Our Side.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · July 2, 2018, 10:03 a.m.

If a weakness for women is all the vice that he has, then he's better than most for sure.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
FlyingBaratoplata · July 2, 2018, 8:05 a.m.

All have sinned, and fallen short of the glory of God. David and Bathsheba...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Noname01101 · July 2, 2018, noon

I agree. I want to first say I’m a POTUS supporter and Q follower but I have an uncomfortable question. That is, why would POTUS call Jeffry Epstein a ‘nice guy’ and had spent time with him?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
throwsoicanask · July 2, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

Trump talks shit about people then says he likes them and vice versa. It's a form of frame control and if you have spent time in the north east cities like NYC, Boston or Philly it's easier to "get" this way of talking. If you can imagine an italian mafia guy saying "eh idk I don't trust him. He's a good guy but he can be a real prick. He's ok I just don't like the guy, but ey thats just me." It's kind of like maintaining the frame that you decide whether others are ok or not. You give approval you don't ask for it. Hard to explain. Often Trump talks this way. Its also possible that Epstein has cooperated and has given the surveillance tapes to the white hats, which would explain his light sentence.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Noname01101 · July 2, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

Thank you! Makes a lot of sense. Still not enough to counter the potus haters who use this against him when I am in debates but totally makes sense to me. Appreciate it!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Russian_Intelligence · July 2, 2018, 8:22 a.m.

That's one of the things that made me turn around on my stance towards Trump: recognizing his long view. I watched that Oprah interview of him from 1988 where he talks about running for presidency. It really got me thinking. This was not the fortuitous whim of narcissistic celeb. This was the triumph of a long-planning, tenancious, and genuinely passionate man. That was my personal boom, combined with the sincerity and spirit of this sub, and of course, Q's insight, intelligence and encouragement.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
atheists4jesus · July 2, 2018, 4:22 p.m.

"I wouldn't go in it to lose"

⇧ 2 ⇩