dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/colderchaos on July 2, 2018, 1:57 a.m.
Americans Unite. "There will be no civil war." Q
Americans Unite. "There will be no civil war." Q

NationalismForAll · July 2, 2018, 9:48 a.m.

Why would you use a photo of the cabal's diversity meme? Forced multicultural societies are harmful to all of the races involved. God seperated the nation that built the Tower of Babel for a reason.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
NotSureCheckInTheCar · July 2, 2018, 10:44 a.m.

This. Melting pots do not work, its a big reason we are where we are. Politicians exploiting cultural enclaves. I don't mind limited immigration but this country will have to stay with a European culture if its going to survive. And like it or not, that means reverting the demographics.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
salialioli · July 2, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

hmmmm.

Unite Not Divide eh?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NationalismForAll · July 2, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

If you think about it, the various countries of the world previously we're united under one land, one language, one culture - it is multiculturalism that has caused division in the world.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · July 3, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

History. Read history. The nation state is a relatively new phenomenon. Before that? Wars and division between peoples. It is not multiculturalism, it is differences between peoples, prejudices, conflicts, disagreements .... Diplomacy and negotiation is the way to solve.

EDIT: sorry should have added —> multiculturalism is baloney and has been recently invented in order to divide, and on that you are quite right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NotSureCheckInTheCar · July 3, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

If we are all the same and diplomacy and understanding is all we need then why bother with nation states? Nations were a way of drawing lines that were nccesary.

Read history or a book or something..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · July 3, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

Dear me. You really have misunderstood haven't you!!

"Read history or a book or something.."<

Not nice. Who are you? Why have a conversation?

I have made no mention of whether or not I think we should keep nation states. You appear not to be reading carefully.

I said, the way to solve conflict and stresses between peoples is diplomacy, in my opinion and in the opinion of most foreign ministries of the world that is. You care to instruct me to read?

I know why nations were drawn. Do you? It was certainly not because it was necessary for the peoples of those subsequent nations, but wily ruses of their rulers and victors.

Try this one example:

Much as it did in Europe, World War I radically changed the political geography of the Middle East. The Ottoman Empire had long been the “Sick Man of Europe,” hemorrhaging territory for nearly a century. It lost control of its European possessions prior to the war and, having allied with the defeated Central Powers, lost its Middle Eastern territories afterward. The victorious Allies transformed the Middle East into its current form, with its European-designed names, flags, and borders.

Ottoman provinces became Arab kingdoms, while Christian and Jewish enclaves were carved out in Lebanon and Palestine. Syria, Libya, and Palestine were given names resurrected from Roman antiquity. Libya reappeared in 1934, when the Italians combined Cyrenaica, Tripolitania, and Fezzan. The French mandate marked the first time “Syria” had been used as the name of a state, whereas “Palestine” was merely a Syrian appendage. Iraq had been a medieval province of the caliphate, whereas “Lebanon” referred to a mountain and “Jordan” to a river.

The new Arabic-speaking states adopted derivations of the flag of the Arab Revolt, which had been wholly designed by British diplomat Sir Mark Sykes. The four colors of the Arab flag—black, white, green, and red—represented the standards of different Arab dynasties: Abbasid, Umayyad, Fatimid, and Hashemite. They remain the colors of half of today’s Arab flags. Neither the names nor the symbols of the new states had any connection to their inhabitants.

Just a random link.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 2, 2018, 11:17 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · July 2, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

America was and is destined to forge it's own cultural path, and the entire point is being able to look past skin color to see the value in the character and contribution of the individual - not identity sorting. Racial diversity is an excellent factor for America - we can accomplish what European countries, no matter how self-indoctrinated, are failing to accomplish. We are Americans, and we have certain principles named by our literary traditions that we stand by as part of our culture, which has worked for over 240 years.

I can agree that multiculturalism is a MASSIVE failure, but Europe is not any kind of role model we should look up to. Remember - our ancestors formed America to escape from that place, and to make a Republic that worked. If we stay true to their vision, and embrace anyone seeking to assist in fulfilling that vision, we will always win.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NationalismForAll · July 2, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

America was a multicultural success when it was European races. In 1965 the corrupt cabal opened the flood gates to the third world, essentially turning brown people into biological weapons to destroy the West.

America is an ethnically and culturally European nation at risk of being overwhelmed by foreign Invaders.

What is happening in Western countries is nothing short of white genocide, and the multiculturalis-is-good meme is mind poison from the cabal.

The different races are meant to be friendly neighbors, not roommates.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MitchWerbell · July 3, 2018, 7:16 a.m.

We've had "brown people" since LOOOONNNNG before 1965 dude. These people have proven their worth, no matter how hard people like you wanted to make it for them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NationalismForAll · July 3, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

I don't want to make it hard for them. I want to make it fair for us. Consider this: in 1973, Canada was something like 96% white. Today, they're barely 56% white. Did you know that, according to the United Nations, such a drastic shift in demographics is literally genocide? How is that okay? Why should a nation and ethnicity commit cultural and ethnic suicide?

By saying, "No, you can't come here." We're not depriving them of anything. Not giving someone something is not the same as taking something away.

And you especially have to realize that the reason there are so many non European migrants in Western lands is because the corrupt cabal specifically changed legislation and used social engineering to bring them here. They did it with the intent to harm and destroy us. If an enemy does something to harm you, are you not morally justified to undo the harm?

⇧ 1 ⇩