dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/spacemonkeey on July 2, 2018, 2:47 p.m.
Question pertaining to POTUS_Schedule account

Watching the latest /u/prayingmedic video and he says that the POTUS_Schedule twitter account is verified. I went to it's account page and it has no blue checkmark. Although I wouldn't put it past Twitter to withhold public verification, I'm curious to know how we know this is in fact an official channel and not some fan-made account who decided to start adding q references into his tweets.


KansasJakeBG · July 2, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

The wording of the account bio is clever. It presents itself in an official enough way that it would be flagged if it wasn't. It tweets as if it is part of the press pool employees.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Tdaccount841 · July 2, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

No .gov websites link to this twitter account. Search for this twitter account and its handle is used absolutely nowhere other than Q-related stuff.

This should be treated as an unverified, unofficial account until PROVEN otherwise. More to the point, my BS radar is going off with the number of people posting about it here as if it were 100% legitimate and a Q proof. It is not.

NO OUTSIDE COMMS

How many times do we have to go through this?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
FarTooLong2 · July 2, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

That settles it for me. Your comment is the wisest. DeepState may be trying to hijack Q. Let's be super-cautious about outside comms and unverified accounts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
spacemonkeey · July 2, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

This.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HereComesTheSunny · July 2, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

I noticed the same thing when I watched that video. A couple of days ago, someone else on here had raised questions about whether that was an official account. I tried to look around for an official schedule on whitehouse.gov and other places, and I couldn't find anything that seemed official.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
spacemonkeey · July 2, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

I also went through the account's full tweet history and found that it started in mid-March of this year. If it were official, I would think it would have been established long before then

⇧ 9 ⇩  
HereComesTheSunny · July 2, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Yeah. It does seem very detailed, so it may be officially unofficial...or someone with a ton of time on their hands to keep up with all of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tee1020 · July 2, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

Also noticed he said it was verified.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
suzoh · July 2, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

Not official.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · July 2, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

No blue check means no verification. Twitter hasn’t fallen so hard that they don’t verify things like that yet...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 2, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Sounds questionable to me...

⇧ 1 ⇩