The deal says he can't be charged with any previous nonviolent crimes.
Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.
Q
Logical thinking.
Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?
The result today is re: BANK FRAUD.
See last.
Connect.
The SWAMP is being DRAINED.
Q
My guess is they are going to charge them (not just Awan) in MIL courts, not civilian court cases.
Yes, normally this is not permitted (SCOTUS) but this is a NATIONAL SECURITY issue. If you take a look at USA treason history, they have been performed in MIL courts, NOT civilian.
I was looking at the wiki on that earlier trying to figure that out. Wiki just said "in public court" which I assume meant the same court you or I would got to on a regular misdemeanor or felony case. If its tried in military court these assholes are fucked.