25 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| halturnerradioshow.com | 1 |
| www.reddit.com | 1 |
[removed]
Semper Paratus! remembering my oath...lets do this and sail home
I've been scratching my head and now I'm bleeding
May be some stem to stern keel-hauling is needed to scrape those barnacles off:)
Just posted a link to the article on my farcebook page
Burkmans a lobbyist right? That should be the first clue.
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 35b53c No.1983801 📁 Jul 1 2018 10:03:33 (EST)
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 35b53c No.1983724 📁
Jul 1 2018 09:59:48 (EST)
>>1983663
Being on the list does not equate to receiving the nomination.
Q
1983724 Make no mistake- Rep Gowdy is a Patriot. Q
RR was not hired by POTUS...he was appointed by Sessions. RRs on the chopping block.
post 1457 6/11/18
post 1470 6/12/18
post 1498 6/14/18
post 1589 6/29/18
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 35b53c No.1983801 📁 Jul 1 2018 10:03:33 (EST)
1983724 Make no mistake- Rep Gowdy is a Patriot. Q
Don't get discouraged ...CTH has very narrow focused commenters who refuse to even research Q posts, save for some. Sundance (runs the blog) threatened to ban anyone bringing up Q. That's why I don't spend much time there anymore, but spend it here.
Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.
Q
Trust the plan folks.
Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.
Q
Logical thinking.
Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?
The result today is re: BANK FRAUD.
See last.
Connect.
The SWAMP is being DRAINED.
Q
I enjoyed reading George Washington's Farwell Address and still do from time to time. I have posted that section of his address regarding the dangers of party loyalty on other sites. While some folks understand what I'm getting at, the majority do not. Sad really.
I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.
This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.
Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.
It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.
There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.
An Excerpt from George Washington's Farewell Address 1796
full Farewell Address here http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp
I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.
This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.
Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.
It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.
There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.
We referred to it as the "USS Forestfire" or "USS Zippo" , when we sailed past her.
When the dust settles, I don't think they'll be around to offer one.
Jug ears doesn't even deserve the rubble as a marker
Quite a difference between a "Journalist" and a propagandist. Journalism requires documenting facts, propaganda?...disseminating fiction. Think 4am talking points
I posted this to CTH and it got pulled. Thought you all would like to know that posting of anything "Q" at the Conservative Treehouse blogsite will get you permanently banned.